- From: <viveca.still@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:52:18 +0200 (EET)
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: David.Parrott@reuters.com, Susanne Guth <susanne.guth@wu-wien.ac.at>, www-drm@w3.org
Consensus may be hard to achieve as to technical standards that is seen by some party as 1) their private intellectual property and/or 2) is part of their business strategy. However, I think it is much more feasable to agree on certain basic rules of the game. Formulating these rules will eventually be a necessity for policymakers (both public authorities and businesses engaged in eCommerce). Technical standards will most certainly be part of the solution, which is were w3c and other important players in the standarization field comes into picture. - Viveca Still Lainaus Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>: > As long as we have so little consensus on what we want to achieve, I > don't think, as a consensus based organization, we have a role in there. > But this might change, if the game cool's down a bit. > > Best, > > Rigo > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 04:58:43PM +0000, David.Parrott@reuters.com > wrote: > > > > The problem I have in discussing DRM is that most people > > assume it is all about "locking up" content with encryption and > > restricting access to it. It's a fair misconception, given the case > > history to date. However, the more enlightened are trying to > > move away from that and towards an enabling infrastructure, > > built from a mixture of legal, commercial, and technical tools, > > that will promote business and improve the consumers lot too. > > If that sounds too idealistic, then perhaps we should give up on > > digital commerce altogether. Personally, I think there is much > > positive work to do. DRM is in its infancy. There have been > > false starts. I hope that everyone's voice is heard by legislators > > and standards makers. It won't go away, so let's make it work. > > > > /Dave. > > > > On 04/03/2002 16:46:44 Susanne Guth wrote: > > > >As the U.S. Congress weighs mandatory digital rights management, > the > > > >European Commission is also looking into the topic. A 43-page EC > > > >study of digital rights management gives a nod to fair use and > privacy > > > >-- and then says DRM schemes are not only inevitable but a fabulous > idea. > > > > > > > >A key excerpt from the study says the EC "should continue to > encourage > > > >all players to develop operational, open and interoperable DRM > > > >solutions and to deploy them rapidly." (Apparently the EC has been > > > >funding such schemes for the last decade.) > > > > > > > >EC study here in PDF form: > > > >http://www.politechbot.com/docs/european.commission.drm.030202.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- --- > > Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com > > > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual > > sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be > > the views of Reuters Ltd. > > Viveca Still viveca.still@helsinki.fi tel. +358-(0)9-19122981 fax. +358-(0)9-19123390
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 13:52:26 UTC