RE: XrML?

Agreed.
In fact, the OeBF has the duplication/coordination issue high on the agenda
of all Working Groups.  Both MPEG and this list are well represented in the
OeBF discussions, so I believe that we will see a significant amount of
progress.

- jdh

-----Original Message-----
From: www-drm-request@w3.org [mailto:www-drm-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
Rob Koenen
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:37 AM
To: Rigo Wenning; www-drm@w3.org
Subject: RE: XrML?


> But I agree, that it is funny to see the multiplication of
> efforts, while in the workshop there were already voices
> complaining about too many different initiatives, which are hard
> to coordinate.

Good point. As far as coordination is concerned, MPEG is
very open to that (with W3C, but also IETF and OEBF with which
there is a liaison). The January Workshop invitation still stands.


Best Regards,
Rob


Rob Koenen
Senior Director of Strategic Technology
InterTrust Technologies Corporation
tel 	+1 (408) 855 6891
fax 	+1 (408) 855 0130
rob@intertrust.com

why maps are needed...

...........................................
Jonathan Schull, Ph.D.,
Founder & Chief Scientist,
Digital Goods (formerly SoftLock.com)
ph:(978)764-1058 fax: 978-461-5945
Five Clock Tower Place, Maynard, MA 01754
...........................................


-----Original Message-----
From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 7:23 AM
To: www-drm@w3.org
Subject: Re: XrML?


I think, what he means, is that there are many attempts out there
to solve the same problem. Most of those attempts use a given
semantics within angle brackets(XML).

Renato suggested to use RDF, which is also with angle-brackets,
but has more constraints than pure XML.

But I agree, that it is funny to see the multiplication of
efforts, while in the workshop there were already voices
complaining about too many different initiatives, which are hard
to coordinate.

Best,

Rigo

On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:25:08AM +0100, J. Chong wrote:
> THanks for your email. I am wondering there is anything to do with XrML.
> Is the XML standard being XrML? Thanks.
>
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, David Parrott wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Also look out for a press release later this week from
> > OASIS ( http://www.oasis-open.org/ ) which will be starting
> > yet another XML standards initiative in the DRM space.
> >
> > Regards,
> > /Dave.
> >
> > _ ______________________________________________________________
> > Dr David J. Parrott (Chartered Engineer) Chief Technology Office
> >      Reuters Limited, 85 Fleet Street, London EC4P 4AJ, UK.
> >    Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7542 9830, Fax: +44 (0)20 7542 8314
> >        Email: David.Parrott@reuters.com, dparrott@acm.org
> >
> >
> > On 23/04/2001 01:21:44 Renato Iannella wrote:
> > > --On 22/4/01 9:17 PM +0200 Rigo Wenning wrote:
> > >
> > > > there are a lot of initiatives out there. I would mention also
> > > > ODRML, which was developed by IPR-Systems. MPEG is also
> > > > addressing the question, as one can see from the minutes of the
> > > > workshop held in Sophia Antipolis in January.
> > >
> > > Some links to current activities:
> > >
> > >  Rights Languages:
> > >
> > >    - ODRL by IPR Systems
> > >      <http://odrl.net/>
> > >
> > >    - XrML by ContentGuard
> > >      <http://www.xrml.org/>
> > >
> > >
> > >  Standards Orgs with DRM Activities:
> > >
> > >    MPEG
> > >     - MPEG-21 Call for Requirements for Rights Dictionary/language
> > >
> > >
<http://www.cselt.it/mpeg/cfp/call_for_requirements(rights_language).htm>
> > >
> > >    OpenEbook Fourm
> > >     - Rights & Rules SIG
> > >       <http://www.openebook.org/activities.htm>
> > >
> > >    IETF
> > >     - Internet DRM WG
> > >       <http://www.idrm.org>
> > >
> > >    DOI
> > >      - Feasibility study for the development of a Rights Data
Dictionary
> > >        <http://www.doi.org/news/010418-multimediaIP.html>
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers...Renato                       <http://purl.net/net/renato>
> > > Chief Scientist, IPR Systems Pty Ltd       <http://iprsystems.com>
> > >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >         Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
> >
> > Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
> > sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
> > the views of Reuters Ltd.
> >
> >
>
> Best regards,
> Jordan CN CHONG

Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2001 03:12:51 UTC