Monday, 22 March 2004
Saturday, 20 March 2004
Friday, 19 March 2004
- Re: "Re: Two tiny questions"
- Re: "Re: Two tiny questions"
- "Re: Two tiny questions"
- Re: Why is DOMDocument derived from DOMNode ??
- Why is DOMDocument derived from DOMNode ??
- Re: Two tiny questions
- Two tiny questions
Thursday, 11 March 2004
- Re: DOMErrorHandler, EventListener, et al in ECMAScript binding
- Re: DOMErrorHandler, EventListener, et al in ECMAScript binding
- Re: DOMErrorHandler, EventListener, et al in ECMAScript binding
- DOMErrorHandler, EventListener, et al in ECMAScript binding
Monday, 8 March 2004
Friday, 27 February 2004
- Re: LSParser.parse - stringData - encoding declaration
- 'Re: "method & parameter naming"'
- Re: 'Re: "method & parameter naming"'
- Minor (very) comments for PR-DOM-Level-3-Core
Thursday, 26 February 2004
- Re: DOM 3 Core namespace normalisation and Level 1 nodes
- Re: Stray mention of Entity in definitions of 'entities'
- Re: L3 Core: 'check-character-normalization' underspecified
- Re: L3 Core: "validate-if-schema" = false disables internal subset processing?
- Re: L3 Core: 'check-character-normalization' underspecified
Wednesday, 25 February 2004
- Re: L3 Core: 'check-character-normalization' underspecified
- LSParser.parse - stringData - encoding declaration
- Re: L3 Core: 'check-character-normalization' underspecified
- L3 Core: "validate-if-schema" = false disables internal subset processing?
- L3 Core: 'check-character-normalization' underspecified
Tuesday, 24 February 2004
- Re: Comments for PR-DOM-Level-3-LS-20040205
- Stray mention of Entity in definitions of 'entities'
- Re: Comments for PR-DOM-Level-3-LS-20040205
- Re: DOM 3 Core namespace normalisation and Level 1 nodes
- Comments for PR-DOM-Level-3-LS-20040205
Monday, 23 February 2004
Thursday, 19 February 2004
- Re: DOM 3 Core namespace normalisation and Level 1 nodes
- Re: "Re: writeToString, write and, UTF-16[BE|LE]"
- Re: XHTML DOM
- Re: "Re: writeToString, write and, UTF-16[BE|LE]"
- Why is readOnly invalid for checkboxes and radio buttons?
- Implementation report update: pxdom
- DOM 3 Core namespace normalisation and Level 1 nodes
Monday, 9 February 2004
- "Re: writeToString, write and, UTF-16[BE|LE]"
- Re: "LSSerializer.writeToString - what encoding declaration?"
Friday, 6 February 2004
Thursday, 5 February 2004
- DOM Level 3 and Load/Save are Proposed Recommendations
- "Re: write and UTF-16[BE|LE]"
- "Re: write and UTF-16[BE|LE]"
- Re: writeToString, write and, UTF-16[BE|LE] (was: "LSSerializer.writeToString - what encoding declaration?")
- Re: write and UTF-16[BE|LE]
Wednesday, 4 February 2004
- Re: writeToString, write and, UTF-16[BE|LE] (was: "LSSerializer.writeToString - what encoding declaration?")
- Re: write and UTF-16[BE|LE]
- Re: write and UTF-16[BE|LE]
- Re: writeToString, write and, UTF-16[BE|LE] (was: "LSSerializer.writeToString - what encoding declaration?")
- writeToString, write and, UTF-16[BE|LE] (was: "LSSerializer.writeToString - what encoding declaration?")
Tuesday, 3 February 2004
Monday, 2 February 2004
- Creating a DOM document from scratch
- Re: "LSSerializer.writeToString - what encoding declaration?"
- 'Re: "LSSerializer.writeToString - what encoding declaration?'
- Re: "LSSerializer.writeToString - what encoding declaration?"
Friday, 30 January 2004
Wednesday, 28 January 2004
Tuesday, 27 January 2004
Sunday, 25 January 2004
Friday, 23 January 2004
- RE: DOM 3 LS - LSSerializer.writeToString encoding declaration
- DOM 3 LS - LSSerializer.writeToString encoding declaration
Monday, 19 January 2004
Wednesday, 14 January 2004
Sunday, 11 January 2004
- L3 Core: DOMConfiguration schema-location and schema-type parameters
- LS Core: expectations on DOMConfiguration.setParameter("error-handler", null);
Friday, 9 January 2004
- Re: LS: Last minute comments on CR
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- raised vs raise
- Re: Comments on DOM Level 3 Core/LS Nov-03 CR
- Re: LS: Last minute comments on CR
- Re: Comments on DOM Level 3 Core Nov-03 CR
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Re: L3 Core: adopting into their existing document
- Re: L3 Core: adopting into their existing document
Thursday, 8 January 2004
Wednesday, 7 January 2004
- Re: L3 Core: adopting into their existing document
- Re: LS: Last minute comments on CR
- Re: L3 Core: "this", "reference" and 'given" nodes muddled in description of compareDocumentPosition and related constants
- Re: L3 Core: "this", "reference" and 'given" nodes muddled in description of compareDocumentPosition and related constants
- Re: L3 Core: adopting into their existing document
- L3 Core: adopting into their existing document
- L3 Core: "this", "reference" and 'given" nodes muddled in description of compareDocumentPosition and related constants
Tuesday, 6 January 2004
- Re: Expected behavior on getFeature() when feature does not introduce a specialized interface?
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Re: Comments on DOM Level 3 Core Nov-03 CR
- Re: LS: Last minute comments on CR
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Expected behavior on getFeature() when feature does not introduce a specialized interface?
Monday, 5 January 2004
- Re: L3 Core: Calling setIdAttribute* when attr value is does not match Name production
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Re: LS: Last minute comments on CR
- Re: Clarification needed regarding default value of newLine in DOMSerializer of DOM L3 LS spec
- Re: Small mistake in DOM L3 LS CR spec at http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-DOM-Level-3-LS-20031107/load-save.html
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Re: Comments on DOM Level 3 Core Nov-03 CR
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Re: node.insertBefore( child )
- Re: Hesitation on setAttributeNS
- Re: node.insertBefore(child, child)
- Re: L3 Core: Element.getIdAttribute() and Element.getIdAttributeNode for convenience
- Re: L3 LS: Configuration parameter to enable/disable application specific DOM
- Re: L3 LS: Configuration parameter to enable/disable application specific DOM
Sunday, 4 January 2004
- Re: L3 LS: Configuration parameter to enable/disable application specific DOM
- Re: L3 LS: Configuration parameter to enable/disable application specific DOM
- Re: L3 LS: Configuration parameter to enable/disable application specific DOM
- Re: L3 LS: Configuration parameter to enable/disable application specific DOM