- From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 21:07:26 +0100
- To: dave.pawson@virgin.net
- CC: www-dom-xpath@w3.org
Dave Pawson wrote: > > Since most things are a response to this header :-) > > A topic on xsl list today noted the > functional environment availability. > > Any thoughts how far this should go > in a tight (not minimalist) spec, > guessing the ultimate would be for > full xpath list of functions available? > > My vote would be for all xpath functions. > DOM's hasfeature() could be used for this, but unless anyone has a strong case for not implementing the full set of functions (and they don't look too scary to me) I think the any compliant DOM XPath implementation should just implement the lot, and leave hasfeature() for querying whatever is tricky enough to be left optional. Liek XPath itself! Francis.
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2000 16:08:23 UTC