- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@virgin.net>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 18:25:58 +0100
- To: <www-dom-xpath@w3.org>
> 1) Ultra Minimal (e.g. Microsoft/Oracle selectNodes as they
exist today).
>
> 2) Minimal but with separate interface+namespace context support.
>
> 3) Complete as makes sense (e.g. full context
initialization, variable
> support, maybe matching, maybe compiled queries, etc.)
>
OK, how about an informal poll. a) Which of these are
*necessary* for the
first round of a DOM-compatible XPath API? b) Which are
*sufficient* (i.e.,
we can stop when we get there)?
-1 for 1)
+1 for 2).
but (aka Scott B) we can't and *shouldn't* stop there.
DaveP
Received on Monday, 8 May 2000 13:26:23 UTC