Thursday, 28 March 2002
- Re: Level 2 HTML Tests
 - Re: Level 2 HTML Tests
 - Re: Future Tests
 - Re: Future Tests
 - Level 2 HTML Tests
 - Re: Future Tests
 - Future Tests
 - DOM3.DTD
 
Wednesday, 27 March 2002
- [Documentation] Added Schema/Writing tests page to /DOM/test area
 - Re: [Recap] Issues
 - Re: [Recap] Issues
 - Re: Grant of License issue
 - Re: Grant of License issue
 - Re: [Recap] Issues
 - Re: [Recap] Issues
 - Grant of License issue
 - Re: [Recap] Issues
 - Re: [Recap] Issues
 - Re: [Recap] Issues
 - Minor fixes to submitted tests
 - [Recap] Issues
 - [General] Updated documentation, added page pointing to implementations that have used DOM TS
 
Tuesday, 26 March 2002
- [Test submission] Netscape Level 1 HTML tests in CVS
 - Re: How should text be normalized for tests?
 - Re: How should text be normalized for tests?
 - Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests
 
Monday, 25 March 2002
- ANN: X-Hive/DB 100% conformance to the DOM Level 1 Test Suite
 - Re: How should text be normalized for tests?
 - Re: How should text be normalized for tests?
 - Re: How should text be normalized for tests?
 - Re: How should text be normalized for tests?
 - How should text be normalized for tests?
 
Sunday, 24 March 2002
Saturday, 23 March 2002
Friday, 22 March 2002
Wednesday, 20 March 2002
- Re: [WG telcon resolutions] Level 2&3 schemas, transforms for non-official DOM bindings --Followup
 - [WG telcon resolutions] Level 2&3 schemas, transforms for non-official DOM bindings
 - [WG Resolution] Read only nodes
 - Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests
 - Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests
 - RE: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests
 - Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests
 - RE: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests
 - Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests
 - Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests
 
Tuesday, 19 March 2002
Monday, 18 March 2002
Sunday, 17 March 2002
- Re: DOMC Test Suite
 - Re: DOMC Test Suite
 - Re: DOMC Test Suite
 - Re: DOMC Test Suite
 - Re: How do I generate test suite code for C?
 - Re: How do I generate test suite code for C?
 
Saturday, 16 March 2002
Thursday, 14 March 2002
Wednesday, 13 March 2002
Friday, 8 March 2002
Thursday, 7 March 2002
Sunday, 3 March 2002
Wednesday, 13 March 2002
- EntityValueReplacement for HTML-Compatilble test
 - EntityValueReplacement for HTML-Compatilble test
 - RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Re: requesting basic sanity check
 - Re: requesting basic sanity check
 - Re: requesting basic sanity check
 - Re: requesting basic sanity check
 
Tuesday, 12 March 2002
- Re: requesting basic sanity check
 - Re: requesting basic sanity check
 - requesting basic sanity check
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Fw: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Fw: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 
Monday, 11 March 2002
Tuesday, 12 March 2002
Monday, 11 March 2002
- Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 
Friday, 8 March 2002
- Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - HTML compatible staff substitutes
 - Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes
 - Core HTML-compatible tests (was Re: Core HTML only tests)
 
Thursday, 7 March 2002
Wednesday, 6 March 2002
- Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors
 - Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future
 - Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future
 
Tuesday, 5 March 2002
- RE: DOM L1 HTML changes
 - RE: DOM L1 HTML changes
 - Re: DOM L1 HTML changes
 - test, please ignore
 - Re: DOM L1 HTML changes
 
Monday, 4 March 2002
Tuesday, 5 March 2002
Monday, 4 March 2002
Saturday, 2 March 2002
- DOM L1 HTML changes
 - Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future
 - Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future
 - Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future