- From: Rick Rivello <richard.rivello@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:16:18 -0400
- To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@aspentech.com>, <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
It is not in the original L1 spec but is in L1(Second Edition). I previously asked this question to the mailing list but did not receive and answer about items in the L1(Second Edition). http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom-ts/2002Jul/0001.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@aspentech.com> To: "'Rick Rivello'" <richard.rivello@nist.gov> Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:11 PM Subject: RE: HTMLTableElement31.xml > Totally empty <TABLE> elements are not valid HTML or XHTML since the DTD's > requires at least one TBODY or TR to appear in the content model of a TABLE. > I believe that was the motivation of my changing the test document to not > have empty tables which had the side effect of compromising the motivation > of this test. > > Creating and adding a table element through the DOM as the test apparently > does appears to be the best way to test that passage without requiring > implementations to accept invalid documents. > > Is the passage you quoted in both L1 and L2 HTML? >
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 14:16:29 UTC