- From: Jason Brittsan <jasonbri@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:33:39 -0800
- To: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Yes, I believe so. -----Original Message----- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis [mailto:dimitris@ontologicon.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:22 PM To: Jason Brittsan Cc: www-dom-ts@w3.org Subject: Re: Release, updates and documentation Good idea, is it reasonable to start the history section as per next release? (we haven't got any changes to previous releases yet) /Dimitris On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at 08:23 , Jason Brittsan wrote: > It would also be extremely useful to add a "History" section to explain > the deltas between each released version. This should also include any > changes to the test cases. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dimitris Dimitriadis [mailto:dimitris@ontologicon.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:52 AM > To: www-dom-ts@w3.org > Subject: Release, updates and documentation > > OK, it looks as if we only have one issue left; JsUnit. While being > resolved, I'll do the following: > > Check index.htm for spelling, links and the extra info Curt indicated > need looking into. > > Update the DOM TS page at W3C, I'll include a "Releases" section > pointing to the distributions (will only consist of this to begin with, > hopefully DOM L1 HTML fairly soon, DOM L2 after that) > > Curt, let me manually put all the generated files in a > DOMTSL1Core-20020212 directory and zip it for posting on W3C machinery > and let's look into automating this task too after that. > > Again, JsUnit still pending, but the above needs to be done in any case > (except for the obvious in case we decide against releasing). > > /Dimitris >
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 19:34:42 UTC