- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:18:38 +0100
- To: "Joseph Kesselman" <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-dom-ts@w3.org
Philippe promised to check this with the appropriate person at W3C. Unless I hear from him within an hour and a half, I'll make a new distribution stating 2002 only. On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at 07:13 , Joseph Kesselman wrote: > > You definitely want to get a lawyer's advice, but: General practice I've > seen is to state both the first year whatever-it-is was copyrighted and > the > year of the most recent set of revisions: "Copyright 2001, 2002 > by ...." > > ______________________________________ > Joe Kesselman / IBM Research >
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 14:40:01 UTC