Re: Copyright issue

Philippe promised to check this with the appropriate person at W3C. 
Unless I hear from him within an hour and a half, I'll make a new 
distribution stating 2002 only.


On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at 07:13 , Joseph Kesselman wrote:

>
> You definitely want to get a lawyer's advice, but: General practice I've
> seen is to state both the first year whatever-it-is was copyrighted and 
> the
> year of the most recent  set of revisions: "Copyright 2001, 2002 
> by ...."
>
> ______________________________________
> Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
>

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 14:40:01 UTC