Re: [Release] Final round

I'd think we shouldn't split the release just to move it up a day.  I don't
know what time zone Edward is in, but I got a flurry of messages about this
time yesterday.  So I'm thinking, he will probably have this morning's
changes in a release in a few hours or so.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Release] Final round


> On second thought, paying respect to the fact that E. Hieatt has indeed
> been responsive and Curt has invested lots of time into the JsUnit
> issue, we may want to consider releasing the Java part of the TS now
> (since we have no issues with it, as far as I can see) and allow for
> some more time in order to release a proper ECMA TS. I think this is the
> safest way to go about.
>
> People's views?
>
> If so, tomorrow mid-day is not to soon, given that we release Java only.
>
> /Dimitris
>
>
> On Monday, February 11, 2002, at 08:35 , Arnold, Curt wrote:
>
> > Edward Hieatt has been very responsive and if the patch that I submitted
> > this morning passes his review, I would expect that he would update
> > JSUnit
> > very quickly.  However, I think that tomorrow mid-day might be to soon
> > to
> > expect an updated JSUnit and I would prefer not to include a JSUnit that
> > does not correspond to a released version.
> >
> > The version numbers are explictly written in the manifest files along
> > with
> > copyright and other information.  I would appreciate someone else
> > updating
> > them appropriately.  They are not part of the transform but are in the
> > java
> > subdirectory (java/dom1-core.mf and java/junit/junit-run.mf, if memory
> > serves).
> >
> > Are you building the distributable with Ant?  There should be a task
> > like
> > dom1-core-dist that would build everything repeatably.
> >
>
>

Received on Monday, 11 February 2002 23:28:34 UTC