- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: 10 Dec 2002 10:47:22 -0500
- To: www-dom-ts@w3.org
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 07:23, Rick Rivello wrote: > > > > Regarding HTMLTableRowElement04: yes, it could be change to avoid the > > ordering given that it is testing the sectionRowIndex attribute. > > However, if getElementById fails, we're back at the beginning, ie the > > tests should not rely on other methods to accomplish its goal. > > > > Anyway, it has been suggested to accept the changes, so here is a > > proposed change for HTMLTableRowElement04: > > [...] > > <var name="testNode" type="Node"/> > > <var name="vsectionrowindex" type="int"/> > > <var name="doc" type="Node"/> > > <load var="doc" href="tablerow" willBeModified="false"/> > > <getElementById interface="Document" obj="doc" var="testNode" > > elementId=""tbody_2nd""/> > > <sectionRowIndex interface="HTMLTableRowElement" obj="testNode" > > var="vsectionrowindex"/> > > <assertEquals actual="vsectionrowindex" expected="1" > > id="sectionRowIndexLink" ignoreCase="false"/> > > [...] > > > > and in tablerow: > > <TR id='tbody_2nd'> > > > > comments? objections? > > > > I do not see any problem with the proposed change to HTMLTableRowElement04. > The aim of the test is still intact after the change. done. Philippe
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 10:47:24 UTC