- From: Mary Brady <mbrady@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 06:45:26 -0700
- To: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
- Cc: <mbrady@nist.gov>
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 06:48:10 UTC
Hmmm -- not I'm even more confused. When I looked at the original test, I thought that the expected result was supposed to be "Y&ent1;", not the expanded version. I don't have the spec in front of me at the moment, but I believe both it and the comment against it were that the expected result should not expand the entity, rather be the text itself. Thus, there was a problem with the test, setting the result to "Y%ent1" instead of "Y&ent1;". At that point, I would have changed the test to simply use "Y&ent1;" instead. After further consideration, it might be better to change it to be some other entity, maybe "Y&ent2;", since that particular attribute is already set to "Y&ent1;" in the staff.xml file -- it's difficult to determine that the setValue actually did anything otherwise. --Mary P.S. Please for the moment cc: Rick and/or myself or www-dom-ts issues if you want feedback. We seem to be having problems getting mail from this list.
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 06:48:10 UTC