- From: Arnold, Curt <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:54:36 -0600
- To: "'www-dom-ts@w3.org'" <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
I think it is probably highly unlikely that an implementation would throw an exception for a known but unsupported feature but not throw an exception for a totally wacky feature. However, if isSupported is going to be tested for all known features, then you should add a wacky feature and version to cover the more likely failure of throwing an exception for an unrecognized or "malformed" feature or version. I've been putting <!-- ISSUE --> comments in tests that I think need to have an errata to resolve (which would be the case here).
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2001 13:56:48 UTC