Re: [General] Review period

As I was just informed, the action item to look into transforming from 
JUnit to DOM TS is dropped, so we don't need to look into that.

/Dimitris

On Wednesday, October 17, 2001, at 07:51  PM, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote:

> Sorry for having been absent for a while.
>
> When could we be safe in assuming the review period to have ended? I 
> personally fell that we should start tying things up in order to have a 
> release soon, especially as so much work on level 2 things is going on. 
> I propose that we all, including the editors and members of the DOM WG, 
> look at the tests for one more week and then proceed to evaluating 
> correctness and so forth before packaging.
>
> We have still to resolve, as a common action item, the question of the 
> simplistic harness to run generated tests online, which would be 
> different than using any of the xUnit frameworks as is being done now. 
> This was a wish from the DOM WG and I think it would be good to have 
> something runnable on the DOM/Test area.
>
> As far as my action items are concerned, I still have to produce and 
> updated documentation, as well as incorporate information about what 
> tests we need on teh main page; this is particularly relevant for level 
> 2 and onwards since level 1 has been fairly complete from the start.
>
> We also have an issue with transforming Junit tests to our DOM TS. Has 
> anyoone looked into this? It would probably be a solution along the 
> lines of Java2XML. Is it doable? Desirable? (The question originates 
> from a comapny that has tests and wants to know if it is worth the 
> effort to transform theses tests).
>
> /Dimitris
>

Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 13:15:30 UTC