- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 14:55:42 +0200
- To: "'Freek de Bruijn'" <freek@x-hive.com>
- Cc: "'www-dom-ts@w3.org'" <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <9F67DC27F4CCD311ABA600508B6A66A44A662A@VXOIMP1>
I forgot to include the DTD previousSibling is actually there, defined last among the attributes appendChild is indeed given as a method insertBefore is there, fifth definition in node-methods nodeType and nodeValue swapped to keep alphabetical order I include the updated file. Thanks for the report. /Dimitris -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Freek de Bruijn [mailto:freek@x-hive.com] Skickat: den 29 maj 2001 10:07 Till: Dimitris Dimitriadis Ämne: RE: My iteration Hello Dimitris, Just some small comments on the last version of the DTD you sent to the DOM TS mailing list: - node-attrs: previousSibling is missing? - node-attrs: appendChild is a method, not an attribute? - (minor) node-attrs: nodeType and nodeValue could be swapped to restore alphabetical order? - node-methods: insertBefore is missing? I hope to have some time to read more of it, but maybe you could already solve these small issues. Regards, Freek --- Freek de Bruijn Software Engineer X-Hive Corporation e-mail: freek@x-hive.com phone: +31 10 7108629 http://www.x-hive.com/ -----Original Message----- From: www-dom-ts-request@w3.org [mailto:www-dom-ts-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dimitris Dimitriadis Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 18:17 To: www-dom-ts@w3.org Subject: SV: My iteration Previous version of DTD now updated with Document, DocumentFragment, DOMImplementation and extended. Also, the source contains comments where things have been changed (newChild, for example, is not a method on Element). In addition, duplicate attributes have been removed (to the best of my knowledge). Some of the issues that have been raised: there are ambigous contexts. Some interfaces contain more attributed than they should (for example data). One way to selve this is to not have them as required, but as implied with a default value to none in the cases where they should not exist according to the spec. Another could be to work primarily against the schema version and use context dependence. We could also make the attribute group definitions more granular in entity form and include them in the way they should where applicable, but I feel this adds complexity. Please sanity check for tomorrow's telcon. I'll get back with an agenda for tomorrow soon. /Dimitris
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: DOMTSML.dtd
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2001 08:56:09 UTC