- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:04:37 +0200
- To: "'www-dom-ts@w3.org'" <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
I definitely agree. However, we've known for some time that the primary place for browsing and downloading tests, transforms and schems would be the W3C site. SF came into the question as an alternative to W3C as far as bug/issue tracking was concerned. I realise that keeping tests and other resources on two different locations can be tedious, but it may be a price that we have to pay (especially myself, since I'm going to manually check in tests to SF if there are issues about them). /Dimitris -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Arnold, Curt [mailto:Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com] Skickat: den 28 juni 2001 19:50 Till: 'www-dom-ts@w3.org' Ämne: RE: [General] domconftest now a project at SourceForge My primary interest in getting the SourceForge project going was getting the tests, transforms and supporting resources in a common CVS, so we could automate the transform/compile/run cycle and collaborate on fixing either the tests or the transforms. The initial hurdles for test correctness are schema/DTD validity and whether the generated code successfully compiles. If the tests and the transforms are all in one CVS, then it should be fairly simple to automate the process and iteratively fix problems. Having the tests and transforms in distinct locations definitely complicates matters, especially since both are evolving.
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2001 14:05:12 UTC