Re: Recap and action items

Agreed.

--Mary

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se>
To: "'Mary Brady'" <mbrady@nist.gov>; "Dimitris Dimitriadis"
<dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se>; <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:30 PM
Subject: SV: Recap and action items


> comments inlined
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: Mary Brady [mailto:mbrady@nist.gov]
> Skickat: den 6 juni 2001 19:31
> Till: Dimitris Dimitriadis; www-dom-ts@w3.org
> Ämne: Re: Recap and action items
>
>
> comments inlined
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se>
> To: "'Mary Brady'" <mbrady@nist.gov>; <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:55 PM
> Subject: SV: Recap and action items
>
>
> > comments inlined
> >
> > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > Från: Mary Brady [mailto:mbrady@nist.gov]
> > Skickat: den 6 juni 2001 17:19
> > Till: www-dom-ts@w3.org
> > Ämne: Re: Recap and action items
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
> > To: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:12 AM
> > Subject: RE: Recap and action items
> >
> >
> > > > A general question, though: How do we deal with the fact that the
DOM
> > > TS
> > > > will be published under the W3C document license? Which IPR
statement
> > > is
> > > it
> > > > people will be presented with when they use the SF platform?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [mb] It seems to me that since this is an official W3C activity, that
at
> > > least the
> > > submittal of tests should be via a w3c.org address.  Is there any way
> > > that
> > > W3C could run a copy of SharePoint as well?
> > >
> > > [ca] The SourceForge Project page will only say that the license is
> > "Other".  On the test submittal mockup, I used a placeholder for a
> statement
> > of the test process IPR.  That text could be anything
> > > that you want it to be.  Any download (.zip, etc) should have the full
> > statement of IPR.  Should each test have a "Copyright (c) 2001, MIT..."
> > boilerplate?
> > >
> > > If you wanted to use a w3 address, you could just put a frameset on
the
> > W3C site that enclosed the sourceforge implementation.  The SourceForge
> > tracker is actually more closely aligned to what we want
> > > to do and is open source, so it could be run on W3C hardware, but I
> think
> > the framing approach is a lot more expedient.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Sounds okay to me -- I think you're right -- we're better off leaving
> things
> > on SourceForge.  As a note, some of the XML tests
> > did come in with copyrights attached to them.  Most organizations are
> > looking to get credit for their contributions.
> >
> > [dd] Of course everybody wants credit. That's why we'll include the
author
> > name and organisation. After submission, however, the tests will belong
to
> > the DOM TS framework.
> >
>
> [mb] Okay -- what happens when tests are submitted with a copyright?  Or,
> do we not accept them unless we have free access to modify them?  I am
> particularly concerned about a test that is submitted, accepted, and then
> someone later believes that there is a problem with the test -- modifies
it,
> and resubmits it -- are we set up to track modifications?
>
> [dd] Very good point. resubmitted with a pointer to the old submission
would
> be ebough, I think, as long as we, as Mary points out, track the
submission
> steps. It's a service, if you will, we should provide.
>
> In any case, I think the process implies that the tests cannot contain
> copyright statements if they are to form part of the DOM TS. I suppose one
> way of going about would be to speak to the submitting party at that time.
>
> --Mary
>
> > --Mary
> >
> >
>

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 13:38:06 UTC