- From: Mary Brady <mbrady@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:53:48 -0400
- To: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se>, <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
This test matrix is generated using a transformation -- I'll make it smarter to only generate links if the files exist -- other just put out the test name. We have all of the tests indicated -- some have not yet been converted to xml (html tests), others are for level 2 (all of the namespace tests -- those containing XMLNS). I'll only generate links for those files that exist. --mary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se> To: "'Mary Brady'" <mbrady@nist.gov>; <www-dom-ts@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:51 AM Subject: SV: SURVEY: Test case naming > Great. Could you just do a checkup on the links, as some are dead? (eg. > domimplementationPositiveCreateDocXMLNS and > domimplementationCreateDocXMLNSIllegalName) > > Thanks > > /Dimitris > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: Mary Brady [mailto:mbrady@nist.gov] > Skickat: den 22 augusti 2001 17:28 > Till: Dimitris Dimitriadis; www-dom-ts@w3.org > Ämne: Re: SURVEY: Test case naming > > > I also have a list of test purposes, with a mapping available tests, > in the NIST test matrix: > > http://xw2k.sdct.itl.nist.gov/brady/w3c-dom/test-matrix.html > > The source for this file is in XML, so it would be easy enough to > add this info to the metadata, so that it could be used together with the > subject url's to describe each test. > > --Mary > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se> > To: <www-dom-ts@w3.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:21 AM > Subject: SV: SURVEY: Test case naming > > > > My vote: > > > > A) -0 > > B) 0 > > C) +0.5 > > D) -0 > > E) 0 > > F) +0.5 > > G) +1 > > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > > Från: Arnold, Curt [mailto:Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com] > > Skickat: den 22 augusti 2001 00:38 > > Till: 'www-dom-ts@w3.org' > > Ämne: RE: SURVEY: Test case naming > > > > > > > I do think shorter names would be good. I'd prefer a > > > compromise between short and mnemonic but I'm slightly > > > concerned that F/G might start to become rather verbose again > > > ("Element_getAttributesByTagName27" is exactly 32 characters.) > > > > Good point. > > > > > > > > I'm not really concerned about preserving the history right > > > now, since there isn't much history yet to be preserved... > > > > [dd] Also a good point. > > > > > I haven't looked at the testcase DTD recently, so this may be > > > a dumb question -- Does it allow sufficiently structured > > > internal documentation to build an index of the testcases > > > sorted by interface, feature, and brief description? If not, > > > should it? > > > > It does. A test or suite contain a <metadata> element that contains > > elements patterned after Dublin Core. Each test should contain several > > <subject resource="uri"/> which points to specific > > passages in the spec. Transforms/subjects.xsl will produce a list of > > canonical URL's for a particular spec. > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2001 11:55:16 UTC