- From: Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:16:05 -0500
- To: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Joseph Kesselman wrote: > > (Of course, readability of those names is rather marginal anyway. I > presume > > people have already considered camelCasedNames...?) > > Unfortunately, I had to lose the camel case names that were in the test > definitions since the .ZIP file names were all lower case. I've only had > nightmares trying the change the capitalization of filenames once they were > in CVS (note the screwy capitalization in the source for domunit). Actually wouldn't we prefer UpperCasedNames instead of camelCasesNames? If a CVS god can repair the file names (I can produce a list of the original intended names from the NIST zip file), I could readily get the content back in synch with the new file names. However, from my limited experience with CVS, trying to work with files that only differ in case is prone to catastrophy. I think the only approach that would work is renaming the repository files. I would recommend that Mary try to preserve the capitalization on their DOM L2 submission or we can fix it up before committing it to the CVS. I only realized the problem once I got to the java compile process which occurred after the files were in the CVS and a substantial amount of changes to the test sources had occurred.
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2001 14:16:04 UTC