- From: Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:07:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
- Cc: "'www-dom-ts@w3.org'" <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Arnold, Curt writes: > They could be in the same directory as long as we use a distinct > extension for test definitions. If they are all .xml files, then > ANT can't determine which files are test definitions and should be > validated or transformed and which are test resources. I'm not sure I understand just what the limitation is. I'll have to dig into Ant a little more to figure it out. > How about .tst for test definitions? Ugh. > If we decide otherwise, we can add the log elements at any time. > I'll put that one on hold. However, leveraging the CVS log is > definitely a better approach than trying to put the equivalent log > explicitly in the test. Fine. Agreed that the log should be maintained in CVS rather than doing it manually. Arnold, Curt writes: > Or I could stop thinking 8.3, how about .domtest? Could, but there's probably no specific reason to avoid 8.3, either. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
Received on Friday, 10 August 2001 14:10:22 UTC