- From: P. Hemagiri <P.Hemagiri@techbooks.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:56:24 +0530
- To: <www-di@w3.org>
- Cc: "Sandeep Khomne" <Sandeep.Khomne@techbooks.com>, "Sameer Tamboli" <Sameer.Tamboli@techbooks.com>, "P. Hemagiri" <P.Hemagiri@techbooks.com>
- Message-ID: <B86178ECDBC0B84EA628CE741D3BFE37014BA083@Mail.maximizelearning.com>
Hi All, It's really great to see a helping hand from all you. I have started reading the documents and it's very interesting. Actually our company was planning to set up a research team which will develop device independent content for mobile learning. For successful planning and execution I need few doubts to be clarified from you all. As of my understanding once a Working Draft Becomes recommendation, then only all the major Telecom or Device manufacturing companies will start adapting the standards set by w3 (please correct me if am wrong). If the above said is the case, then the below is our plan * Identify the Recommendations set by W3c till now for device independent content delivery. * Recommendations adapted by Device manufacturing companies to be identified. To be in detail, we have to conclude which models have adapted which recommendations. * If we find a minimum one model from every major manufacturer supporting the above identified recommendations, we will proceed to point 4. * We will research and explore the technologies laid by the recommendations and start developing content. Can we actually develop a Device Independent Content Delivery with the current technologies adapted by Device manufacturers? If we can, how much time and resources are required to successfully develop device independent content for mobile learning? In our Initial findings, the below listed technologies are going to rule the future of Device Independent content delivery, * WAP 2.0 - XHTML along with ECMAScript * XHTML Mobile Profile (XHTML MP) * ECMAScript Mobile Profile (ESMP) * WAP Push * SMIL * CSS3: Media queries * Xforms * VoiceXML * Device Independent Authoring Language (DIAL) Guys, the above said plan is a rough draft out of our understanding. Do correct us or you all can always suggest a different plan altogether. Thanks in advance, Hemagiri.
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 07:28:48 UTC