- From: Ben Francis <lists@hippygeek.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:17:50 +0100
- To: www-di@w3.org
Dear Device Independence Working Group, I am an undergraduate reading for BEng/MEng Computer Interactive Systems at the University of Birmingham in the UK and I am very interested in the activities of the Device Independence Working Group. I am also currently completing a paper for a competition entry which touches on these issues. Please tell me if there is a more appropriate place to ask these questions. I am interested to know whether members of the working group envisage Device Independent Authoring Language documents being rendered natively (say, in a web browser) or transformed (with either client or server-side adaptation) into another format first. Or perhaps both uses are intended? I understand that it would be possible to transform a DIAL document into another format using XSLT, but for server-side adaptation that would require an XSL stylesheet for every conceivable format, even those which the author of a document may not envisage. Also, how far does "device independence" stretch exactly? For example, do you think a certain resource could be represented by a device as simplistic as a light switch? A URI could be used to point at a resource http://house/lounge/lamp which could be rendered by a light switch in the room or on a control panel somewhere else in the building. Is this stretching the language too far? Thank you for your time Ben Francis
Received on Saturday, 27 May 2006 13:11:24 UTC