- From: Keith Waters <kwaters@ftrd.us>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:57:10 -0400
- To: www-di@w3.org
- Message-Id: <53316BBD-A83D-4A65-8693-2BDE4FF5DCDB@ftrd.us>
Hi Jeremy and Mark, This message contains a response to comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-DPF-20041122/ We redrew fig2 as in the attached PDF file. We simplified the lines, so that they just show parent/child relationships, and not sibling relationships. We added arrows to the lines rather than relying on the vertical convention of parents above children. We clarified that the labels (except DPF component) were describing the relationship between parent and child, rather than describing the child We also added a little bit more, to show how a value could be drawn in the picture, as a leaf node, with the value labelling the node. This picture then is an RDF graph, and conveys much of the information of fig 2. The (implicit) resource values of the properties are made explicit as unnamed circles, and the property names are used to appropriate link the ovals in the diagram. This diagram does not suffer the problem of figure 2 that the labels GPS and IBM:GPS and NOKIA:GPS are used to show the relationship between the parent node and the labelled node, whereas the label "DPF Component" does not, which is visually confusing. The DPF Working Group has reviewed the comment and Figure 2 has been updated to reflect A/B/C:GPS. This diagram is not intended to illustrate RDF graph structure.
-Keith Waters
Attachments
- image/png attachment: dpf2.png
Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 22:41:53 UTC