- From: Keith Waters <kwaters@ftrd.us>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:48:51 -0400
- To: www-di@w3.org
Hi Jeremy, This message contains a response to comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-DPF-20041122/ s7. Metadata is unusable The end of 4.2.1 provides a metadata interface, but with no indication of what are the legal values for either of the two attributes they are unusable - they have no semantics. My preference is to delete these attributes and say that metadata about a property (i.e. the concept that is being used, rather than the value of the property in this particular context) should be provided in RDF/XML at the URI created by concatenating the namespaceURI with the name (as in RDF/XML). To address this Meta Data issue, the following section 4.1.5 Meta Data has been added to the WD. 4.1.5 Meta Data Meta data can be directly or indirectly associated with DPF properties. Some potential examples of interesting meta data include the version of a property interface, and timestamps for property creation and modification. Richer meta data could describe ontologies of properties, and be expressed using powerful meta data frameworks like OWL [OWL] for the purposes of authoring solutions. Note that the kinds of meta data and their representation is outside the scope of this specification. The DPFMetaDataExtInterface interface provides a means for accessing meta data directly associated with a property, in terms of a pointer to an interface for the meta data and a DOMString value identifying the type for that interface. -Keith Waters
Received on Friday, 3 June 2005 14:11:39 UTC