- From: Kai Hendry <hendry@cs.helsinki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:58:55 +0300
- To: "ganesh@t-email.co.uk" <ganesh@t-email.co.uk>
- Cc: www-di@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 03:36:55 +0000, ganesh@t-email.co.uk wrote: > > For example: Nokia3100/1.1 (06.01) Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 > Yes. Where I work we see multiple versions of a browser throughout a product's > lifecycle. Usually these are just bugfixes (or bug includes), but sometimes > major changes in functionality can occur, such as the addition of XHTML > to some Nokias mid-lifecycle. Browsers vary between countries and operators > too. Oh dear ! One more thing. Can Nokia upgrade it's browser when the device is "out in the wild"? Does it have some sort remote update system? Or can I assume once a device ships with version 1.1 it will always be 1.1. > Doesn't appear so. Nokia gets around the problem by issuing a fresh UAProf for > each device with an Rnnn at the end of the UAProf name referring to each > version. This doesn't seem to map exactly, however. Your device advertises > itself in its headers as version 1.1 of the 3100, but there's only an R100 > UAProf. Doesn't this strike you as a tiny bit silly to have to have an entirely new UAProf for a UA agent revision? Is this how UAProf was designed, or this is how Nokia has implemented it? > > [1] http://natalian.org/archives/2004/06/18/nokia-inline-image-test/ > You seem confused by what "file too large" means on a Nokia. It refers to > the byte-size of the file (eg, it's bust the deck limit or the device has > simply run out of memory): the geometrical size of the image doesn't cause > this error. Oh really? I must try that, when my stupid operator's GPRS service starts to work again...
Received on Monday, 21 June 2004 11:59:35 UTC