- From: Kai Hendry <hendry@cs.helsinki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:50:01 +0300
- To: www-di@w3.org
Is transcoding the same as re-adaption? http://www.w3.org/2000/10/DIAWorkshop/dia-realistic.html And is it safe to safe scaling is part of the field of accessibility? And is it to safe "device independence" is part of the field of accessibility? Is there a difference between "universal" accessibility (crops up a lot in academic literature), and vanilla "accessibility"? I am trying desperately to apply logic to this all. :) Does this little bit of UTF-8 art look plausible: [universal] accessibility | ---------------------------------------- | | | Usability Device independence Special needs | | * Visual | Scaling * Hearing Multi-Modality * Cognitive Perhaps someone could point me out to some "authoritative sources". :) I wrote a bit of piece on text width I would appreciate comments on: http://natalian.org/archives/2004/06/09/text-width/ It's quite frustrating how I go back and forth between this email list and the web blog. The two should converge... I wonder if I should I should start (cross-)posting to w3c-wai-ig!?
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2004 04:50:03 UTC