- From: Kai Hendry <hendry@cs.helsinki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:07:23 +0300
- To: www-di@w3.org
Hello again, I have some questions I need to clear up for my thesis that perhaps you can help with. Is there a good reason why the profiles list the content types that are sent with HTTP_X_NOKIA_WIA_ACCEPT_ORIGINAL and HTTP_ACCEPT? http://cookie.dabase.com/logs/217.78.192.82 I can't think of any. I suspect these *gateways* might cause problems like they did in WAP, but I have not encountered any myself. Comments? Do these gateways (e.g. NWG/4.0/Build64) do their job? Why can't there be a direct connection? Does it have to be Nokia hardware? XHTML MP doesn't use WMLC. Or am I missing something? I see MMS uses WAP, so that means it must use some W3C technologies (e.g. UA Profiles). But I don't quite understand how closely are they related. Are MMS transported over the Internet? Is there some convergence with the Web? Or is it completely separate? Can I safely say that PUSH has no part in Web architecture?
Received on Monday, 26 July 2004 06:07:03 UTC