CSS Text Module Level 4

Editor’s Draft,

More details about this document
This version:
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-4/
Latest published version:
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-4/
Previous Versions:
Feedback:
CSSWG Issues Repository
Inline In Spec
Editors:
Elika J. Etemad / fantasai (Apple)
(Invited Expert)
(Adobe Systems)
Florian Rivoal (Invited Expert)
Suggest an Edit for this Spec:
GitHub Editor
Test Suite:
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-text/

Abstract

This CSS module defines properties for text manipulation and specifies their processing model. It covers line breaking, justification and alignment, white space handling, and text transformation.

CSS is a language for describing the rendering of structured documents (such as HTML and XML) on screen, on paper, etc.

Status of this document

This is a public copy of the editors’ draft. It is provided for discussion only and may change at any moment. Its publication here does not imply endorsement of its contents by W3C. Don’t cite this document other than as work in progress.

Please send feedback by filing issues in GitHub (preferred), including the spec code “css-text” in the title, like this: “[css-text] …summary of comment…”. All issues and comments are archived. Alternately, feedback can be sent to the (archived) public mailing list www-style@w3.org.

This document is governed by the 12 June 2023 W3C Process Document.

1. Introduction

Tests

The test coverage information in this specification covers wpt/css/css-text/ and subdirectories, as well as those tests in wpt/css/CSS2/ and subdirectories that relate to this specification.


This module describes the typesetting controls of CSS; that is, the features of CSS that control the translation of source text to formatted, line-wrapped text. Various CSS properties provide control over case transformation, white space collapsing, text wrapping, line breaking rules and hyphenation, alignment and justification, spacing, and indentation. See Additions Since Level 3 for additions since Level 3.

Note: Font selection is covered in the CSS Fonts Module. [CSS-FONTS-3]

Features for decorating text, such as underlines, emphasis marks, and shadows, (previously part of this module) are covered in the CSS Text Decoration Module. [CSS-TEXT-DECOR-3]

Bidirectional and vertical text are addressed in the CSS Writing Modes Module. [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4].

Further information about the typesetting requirements of various languages and writing systems around the world can be found in the Internationalization Working Group’s Language Enablement Index. [TYPOGRAPHY]

Tests

The following tests are crash tests that relate to general usage of the features described in this specification but are not tied to any particular normative statement.


1.1. Module Interactions

Tests

Tests not needed for this section.


This module, together with the CSS Text Decoration Module, replaces and extends the text-level features defined in Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 chapter 16. [CSS-TEXT-DECOR-3] [CSS2]

In addition to the terms defined below, other terminology and concepts used in this specification are defined in Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 and the CSS Writing Modes Module. [CSS2] and [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4].

1.2. Value Definitions

Tests

Tests not really needed for this section; could possibly test that css-wide keywords apply to every property.


This specification follows the CSS property definition conventions from [CSS2] using the value definition syntax from [CSS-VALUES-3]. Value types not defined in this specification are defined in CSS Values & Units [CSS-VALUES-3]. Combination with other CSS modules may expand the definitions of these value types.

In addition to the property-specific values listed in their definitions, all properties defined in this specification also accept the CSS-wide keywords as their property value. For readability they have not been repeated explicitly.

1.3. Languages and Typesetting

Tests

Tests not needed for this section: these are definitions, they get tested through their application, not by themselves.


Authors should accurately language-tag their content for the best typographic behavior.

Many typographic effects vary by linguistic context. Language and writing system conventions can affect line breaking, hyphenation, justification, glyph selection, and many other typographic effects. In CSS, language-specific typographic tailorings are only applied when the content language is known (declared). Therefore, higher quality typography requires authors to communicate to the UA the correct linguistic context of the text in the document.

The content language of an element is the (human) language the element is declared to be in, according to the rules of the document language. Note that it is possible for the content language of an element to be unknown—e.g. untagged content, or content in a document language that does not have a language-tagging facility, is considered to have an unknown content language.

Note: Authors can declare the content language using the global lang attribute in HTML or the universal xml:lang attribute in XML. See the rules for determining the content language of an HTML element in HTML, and the rules for determining the content language of an XML element in XML 1.0. [HTML] [XML10]

The content language an element is declared to be in also identifies the specific written form of that language used in that element, known as the content writing system. Depending on the document language’s facilities for identifying the content language, this information can be explicit or implied. See the normative Appendix F: Identifying the Content Writing System.

Note: Some languages have more than one writing system tradition; in other cases a language can be transliterated into a foreign writing system. Authors should subtag such cases so that the UA can adapt appropriately.

For example, Korean (ko) can be written in Hangul (-Hang), Hanja (-Hani), or a combination (-Kore). Historical documents written solely in Hanja do not use word spaces and are formatted more like modern Chinese than modern Korean. In other words, for typographic purposes ko-Hani behaves more like zh-Hant than ko (ko-Kore).

As another example Japanese (ja) is typically written in a combination (-Japn) of Hiragana (-Hira), Katakana (-Kana), and Kanji (-Hani). However, it can also be “romanized” into Latin (-Latn) for special purposes like language-learning textbooks, in which case it should be formatted more like English than Japanese.

As a third example contemporary Mongolian is written in two scripts: Cyrillic (-Cyrl, officially used in Mongolia) and Mongolian (-Mong, more common in Inner Mongolia, part of China). These have very different formatting requirements, with Cyrillic behaving similar to Latin and Greek, and Mongolian deriving from both Arabic and Chinese writing conventions.

1.4. Characters and Letters

Tests

For the most part, tests not really needed for this section: these are definitions, they get tested through their applications, by themselves. The few testable assertions that are made have coverage.

Possible additions:


The basic unit of typesetting is the character. However, because writing systems are not always as simple as the basic English alphabet, what a character actually is depends on the context in which the term is used. For example, in Hangul (the Korean writing system), each square representation of a syllable (e.g. =Han) can be considered a character. However, the square symbol is really composed of multiple letters each representing a phoneme (e.g. =h, =a, =n) and these also could each be considered a character.

A basic unit of computer text encoding, for any given encoding, is also called a character, and depending on the encoding, a single encoding character might correspond to the entire pre-composed syllabic character (e.g. ), to the individual phonemic character (e.g. ), or to smaller units such as a base letterform (e.g. ) and any combining marks that vary it (e.g. extra strokes that represent aspiration).

In turn, a single encoding character can be represented in the data stream as one or more bytes; and in programming environments one byte is sometimes also called a character.

Therefore the term character is fairly ambiguous where technical precision is required.

For text layout, we will refer to the typographic character unit as the basic unit of text. Even within the realm of text layout, the relevant character unit depends on the operation. For example, line-breaking and letter-spacing will segment a sequence of Thai characters that include U+0E33  ำ THAI CHARACTER SARA AM differently; or the behavior of a conjunct consonant in a script such as Devanagari may depend on the font in use. So the typographic character represents a unit of the writing system—such as a Latin alphabetic letter (including its diacritics), Hangul syllable, Chinese ideographic character, Myanmar syllable cluster—that is indivisible with respect to a particular typographic operation (line-breaking, first-letter effects, tracking, justification, vertical arrangement, etc.).

Tests

Unicode Standard Annex #29: Text Segmentation defines a unit called the grapheme cluster which approximates the typographic character. [UAX29] A UA must use the extended grapheme cluster (not legacy grapheme cluster), as defined in UAX29, as the basis for its typographic character unit. However, the UA should tailor the definitions as required by typographic tradition since the default rules are not always appropriate or ideal—and is expected to tailor them differently depending on the operation as needed.

Tests

Note: The rules for such tailorings are out of scope for CSS.

The following are some examples of typographic character unit tailorings required by standard typesetting practice:

A typographic letter unit (or letter for the purpose of this specification) is a typographic character unit belonging to one of the Letter or Number general categories. See Appendix E: Characters and Properties for how to determine the Unicode properties of a typographic character unit.

The rendering characteristics of a typographic character unit divided by an element boundary is undefined. Ideally each component should be rendered according to the formatting requirements of its respective element’s properties while maintaining correct shaping and positioning of the typographic character unit as a whole. However, depending on the nature of the formatting differences between its parts and the capabilities of the font technology in use, this is not always possible. Therefore such a typographic character unit may be rendered as belonging to either side of the boundary, or as some approximation of belonging to both. Authors are forewarned that dividing grapheme clusters or ligatures by element boundaries may give inconsistent or undesired results.

1.5. Text Processing

Tests

This section has adequate coverage. Exhaustive coverage unrealistic, since this section is effectively a dependency on all of Unicode. Some tests nonetheless provided for key functionality (such as the effect of certain control characters on Arabic shaping).


CSS is built on Unicode. [UNICODE] UAs that support Unicode must adhere to all normative requirements of the Unicode Core Standard, except where explicitly overridden by CSS. UAs implemented on the basis of a non-Unicode text encoding model are still expected to fulfill the same text handling requirements by assuming an appropriate mapping and analogous behavior.

Tests

For the purpose of determining adjacency for text processing (such as white space processing, text transformation, line-breaking, etc.), and thus in general within this specification, intervening inline box boundaries and out-of-flow elements must be ignored. With respect to text shaping, however, see § 8.7 Shaping Across Element Boundaries.

Tests

2. Transforming Text

2.1. Case Transforms: the text-transform property

Tests

This section has good test coverage overall, and very good i18n coverage in particular.

Missing tests:

Possible additions:


Name: text-transform
Value: none | [capitalize | uppercase | lowercase ] || full-width || full-size-kana
Initial: none
Applies to: text
Inherited: yes
Percentages: n/a
Computed value: specified keyword
Canonical order: n/a
Animation type: discrete
Tests

This property transforms text for styling purposes. It has no effect on the underlying content, and must not affect the content of a plain text copy & paste operation.

Tests

Authors must not rely on text-transform for semantic purposes; rather the correct casing and semantics should be encoded in the source document text and markup.

Tests

Values have the following meanings:

none
No effects.
Tests
capitalize
Puts the first typographic letter unit of each word, if lowercase, in titlecase; other characters are unaffected.
Tests
uppercase
Puts all letters in uppercase.
Tests
lowercase
Puts all letters in lowercase.
Tests
full-width
Puts all typographic character units in full-width form. If a character does not have a corresponding full-width form, it is left as is. This value is typically used to typeset Latin letters and digits as if they were ideographic characters.
Tests
full-size-kana
Converts all small Kana characters to the equivalent full-size Kana. This value is typically used for ruby annotation text, where authors may want all small Kana to be drawn as large Kana to compensate for legibility issues at the small font sizes typically used in ruby.
Tests
The following example converts the ASCII characters used in abbreviations in Japanese text to their full-width variants so that they lay out and line break like ideographs:
abbr:lang(ja) { text-transform: full-width; }

Note: The purpose of text-transform is to allow for presentational casing transformations without affecting the semantics of the document. Note in particular that text-transform casing operations are lossy, and can distort the meaning of a text. While accessibility interfaces may wish to convey the apparent casing of the rendered text to the user, the transformed text cannot be relied on to accurately represent the underlying meaning of the document.

In this example, the first line of text is capitalized as a visual effect.
section > p:first-of-type::first-line {
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

This effect cannot be written into the source document because the position of the line break depends on layout. But also, the capitalization is not reflecting a semantic distinction and is not intended to affect the paragraph’s reading; therefore it belongs in the presentation layer.

In this example, the ruby annotations, which are half the size of the main paragraph text, are transformed to use regular-size kana in place of small kana.
rt { font-size: 50%; text-transform: full-size-kana; }
:is(h1, h2, h3, h4) rt { text-transform: none; /* unset for large text*/ }

Note that while this makes such letters easier to see at small type sizes, the transformation distorts the text: the reader needs to mentally substitute small kana in the appropriate places—not unlike reading a Latin inscription where all “U”s look like “V”s.

For example, if text-transform: full-size-kana were applied to the following source, the annotation would read “じゆう” (jiyū), which means “liberty”, instead of “じゅう” (jū), which means “ten”, the correct reading and meaning for the annotated “十”.

<ruby><rt>じゅう</ruby>

2.1.1. Mapping Rules

Tests

This section has adequate test coverage.


For capitalize, what constitutes a “word“ is UA-dependent; [UAX29] is suggested (but not required) for determining such word boundaries. Out-of-flow elements and inline element boundaries must not introduce a text-transform word boundary and must be ignored when determining such word boundaries.

Tests

Note: Authors cannot depend on capitalize to follow language-specific titlecasing conventions (such as skipping articles in English).

The UA must use the full case mappings for Unicode characters, including any conditional casing rules, as defined in the Default Case Algorithms section of The Unicode Standard. [UNICODE] If (and only if) the content language of the element is, according to the rules of the document language, known, then any appropriate language-specific rules must be applied as well. These minimally include, but are not limited to, the language-specific rules in Unicode’s SpecialCasing.txt.

Tests
For example, in Turkish there are two “i”s, one with a dot—“İ” and “i”—and one without—“I” and “ı”. Thus the usual case mappings between “I” and “i” are replaced with a different set of mappings to their respective dotless/dotted counterparts, which do not exist in English. This mapping must only take effect if the content language is Turkish written in its modern Latin-based writing system (or another Turkic language that uses Turkish casing rules); in other languages, the usual mapping of “I” and “i” is required. This rule is thus conditionally defined in Unicode’s SpecialCasing.txt file.
Tests

The definition of full-width and half-width forms can be found in Unicode Standard Annex #11: East Asian Width. [UAX11] The mapping to full-width form is defined by taking code points with the <wide> or the <narrow> tag in their Decomposition_Mapping in Unicode Standard Annex #44: Unicode Character Database. [UAX44] For the <narrow> tag, the mapping is from the code point to the decomposition (minus <narrow> tag), and for the <wide> tag, the mapping is from the decomposition (minus the <wide> tag) back to the original code point.

Tests

The mappings for small Kana to full-size Kana are defined in Appendix G: Small Kana Mappings.

2.2. Expanding Between Words: the word-space-transform property

Tests

This section has generally good coverage.

Missing tests:


Name: word-space-transform
Value: none | [ space | ideographic-space ] && auto-phrase?
Initial: none
Applies to: text
Inherited: yes
Percentages: N/A
Computed value: as specified
Canonical order: per grammar
Animation type: discrete
Tests

Some languages and writing systems have alternative ways of delimiting words, either using different separating characters, or sometimes no visible character at all. This property allows authors to change the rendering from one style to another without needing to change the markup.

none
This property has no effect.
Tests
space
Expandable separators within the child text of this element are replaced by U+0020 SPACE.
Tests
ideographic-space
Expandable separators within the child text of this element are replaced by U+3000 IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE.
Tests
auto-phrase
If the content language is known and the user agent supports linguistic analysis for this language, the user agent must detect phrase boundaries. If a word-separator character, other space separator, or U+200B ZERO WIDTH SPACE character does not already occur at that boundary, then the UA must insert a virtual expandable separator.
Tests

If this value is omitted, or if the content language is unknown, or if the user agent does not support detecting phrase boundaries for that language, there are no virtual expandable separator.

Tests

For the purpose of this property, expandable separators are any of:

A virtual expandable separator is a UA-detected syntactic boundary in the text that represents an expandable separator not otherwise occuring in the source document. It has no effect other than for this property.

The user agent must not replace expandable separators immediately preceding or following a forced line break (ignoring any intervening inline box boundaries, and associated margin/border/padding).

Tests

Note: Because virtual expandable separators are placed in the outermost element that participates in an inline box boundary, if one would coincide with boundary of an inline box whose parent box has a used value of word-space-transform: none, that particular virtual expandable separator is not expanded, since it would be placed in the parent box.

Tests

Like text-transform, this property transforms text for styling purposes only. It has no effect on the underlying content, and must not affect the content of a plain text copy & paste operation.

Tests

Unlike books for adults, Japanese books for young children often feature spaces between sentence segments, to facilitate reading. People with dyslexia also tend to find this style easier to read.

Absent any particular styling, the following sentence would be rendered as depicted below.

<p>むかしむかし、<wbr>あるところに、<wbr>おじいさんと<wbr>おばあさんが<wbr>すんでいました。

むかしむかし、あるところに、おじいさんとおばあさんがすんでいました。


Phrase-based spacing can be achieved with the following css:

p {
  word-space-transform: ideographic-space;
}

むかしむかし、 あるところに、 おじいさんと おばあさんが すんでいました。


Another common variant additionally restricts the allowable line breaks to these phrase boundaries. Using the same markup, this is easily achieved with the following css:

p {
  word-break: keep-all;
  word-space-transform: ideographic-space;
}

むかしむかし、 あるところに、 おじいさんと おばあさんが すんでいました。

Tests

In addition to making the source code more readable, using wbr rather than U+200B in the markup also allow authors to classify the delimiters into different groups.

In the following example, wbr elements are either unmarked when they delimit a word, or marked with class p when they also delimit a phrase.

<p>らいしゅう<wbr><wbr>じゅぎょう<wbr><wbr class=p
>たいこ<wbr><wbr>ばち<wbr><wbr class=p
>もって<wbr>きて<wbr>ください。

Using this, it is possible not only to enable the rather common phrase-based spacing, but also word-by-word spacing that is likely to be preferred by people with dyslexia to reduce ambiguities, or other variants such as a combination of phrase-based spacing and of word-based wrapping.

Usual rendering

らいしゅうじゅぎょうたいこばちもってきてください。


Phrase spacing
p wbr.p {
  word-space-transform: ideographic-space;
}

らいしゅうじゅぎょうに たいこばちを もってきてください。


Word spacing
p wbr {
  word-space-transform: ideographic-space;
}

らいしゅう の じゅぎょう に たいこ と ばち を もって きて ください。


Phrase spacing, word wrapping
p {
  word-break: keep-all;
}
p wbr.p {
  word-space-transform: ideographic-space;
}

らいしゅうじゅぎょうに たいこばちを もってきてください。


Word spacing and wrapping
p {
  word-break: keep-all;
}
p wbr {
  word-space-transform: ideographic-space;
}

らいしゅう の じゅぎょう に たいこ と ばち を もって きて ください。

2.3. Order of Operations

Tests

This section has adequate test coverage.


When multiple transformations need to be applied, they are applied in the following order:

  1. word-space-transform
  2. capitalize, uppercase, and lowercase
  3. full-width
  4. full-size-kana
Tests

Word space transformation and text transformation happen after § 4.3.1 Phase I: Collapsing and Transformation but before § 4.3.2 Phase II: Trimming and Positioning. This means for instance that full-width only transforms spaces (U+0020) to U+3000 IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE within preserved white space.

Tests

Note: As defined in Appendix A: Text Processing Order of Operations, transforming affects line-breaking and other formatting operations.

Tests

3. White Space and Wrapping: the white-space property

Tests

This section has good overall test coverage, particularly through tests for § 4 White Space Processing & Control Characters and subsections, and longhand properties.

Missing tests:


Name: white-space
Value: normal | pre | nowrap | pre-wrap | pre-line | <'white-space-collapse'> || <'text-wrap-mode'> || <'white-space-trim'>
Initial: normal
Applies to: text
Inherited: yes
Percentages: n/a
Computed value: specified keyword
Canonical order: n/a
Animation type: discrete
Tests

This property is a shorthand for white-space-collapse, text-wrap-mode, and white-space-trim. It specifies two things:

Note: This shorthand combines both inheritable and non-inheritable properties. If this is a problem, please inform the CSSWG.

Unless otherwise specified, any omitted longhand is set to its initial value.

The following table gives the normative mapping of the values of the shorthand’s special keywords to their equivalent longhand values.

white-space white-space-collapse text-wrap-mode white-space-trim
normal collapse wrap none
pre preserve nowrap none
pre-wrap preserve wrap none
pre-line preserve-breaks wrap none

Note: In some cases, preserved white space and other space separators can hang when at the end of the line; this can affect whether they are measured for intrinsic sizing.

The following informative table summarizes the behavior of various white-space values:

New Lines Spaces and Tabs Text Wrapping End-of-line spaces End-of-line other space separators
normal Collapse Collapse Wrap Remove Hang
pre Preserve Preserve No wrap Preserve No wrap
nowrap Collapse Collapse No wrap Remove Hang
pre-wrap Preserve Preserve Wrap Hang Hang
break-spaces Preserve Preserve Wrap Wrap Wrap
pre-line Preserve Collapse Wrap Remove Hang

4. White Space Processing & Control Characters

Tests

This section has reasonably good test coverage.

Missing tests:


The source text of a document often contains formatting that is not relevant to the final rendering: for example, breaking the source into segments (lines) for ease of editing or adding white space characters such as tabs and spaces to indent the source code. CSS white space processing allows the author to control interpretation of such formatting: to preserve or collapse it away when rendering the document. White space processing in CSS (which is controlled with the white-space-collapse and white-space-trim properties) interprets white space characters only for rendering: it has no effect on the underlying document data.

Note: Depending on the document language, segments can be separated by a particular newline sequence (such as a line feed or CRLF pair), or delimited by some other mechanism, such as the SGML RECORD-START and RECORD-END tokens.

For CSS processing, each document language–defined “segment break” or “newline sequence”—or if none are defined, each line feed (U+000A)—in the text is treated as a segment break, which is then interpreted for rendering as specified by the white-space property.

In the case of HTML, newlines are normalized to line feed characters (U+000A) for representation in the DOM, so when an HTML document is represented as a DOM tree each line feed (U+000A) is treated as a segment break. [HTML] [DOM]

Note: In most common CSS implementations, HTML does not get styled directly. Instead, it is processed into a DOM tree, which is then styled. Unlike HTML, the DOM does not give any particular meaning to carriage returns (U+000D), so they are not treated as segment breaks. If carriage returns (U+000D) are inserted into the DOM by means other than HTML parsing, they then get treated as defined below.

Tests

Note: A document parser might not only normalize any segment breaks, but also collapse other space characters or otherwise process white space according to markup rules. Because CSS processing occurs after the parsing stage, it is not possible to restore these characters for styling. Therefore, some of the behavior specified below can be affected by these limitations and may be user agent dependent.

Note: Anonymous blocks consisting entirely of collapsible white space are removed from the rendering tree. Thus any such white space surrounding a block-level element is collapsed away. See CSS 2.1 § 9.2.2.1 Anonymous inline boxes. [CSS2]

Control characters (Unicode category Cc)—other than tabs (U+0009), line feeds (U+000A), carriage returns (U+000D) and sequences that form a segment breakmust be rendered as a visible glyph which the UA must synthesize if the glyphs found in the font are not visible, and must be otherwise treated as any other character of the Other Symbols (So) general category and Common script. The UA may use a glyph provided by a font specifically for the control character, substitute the glyphs provided for the corresponding symbol in the Control Pictures block, generate a visual representation of its code point value, or use some other method to provide an appropriate visible glyph. As required by Unicode, unsupported Default_ignorable characters must be ignored for text rendering. [UNICODE]

Tests

Carriage returns (U+000D) are treated identically to spaces (U+0020) in all respects.

Tests

Note: For HTML documents, carriage returns present in the source code are converted to line feeds at the parsing stage (see HTML § 13.2.3.5 Preprocessing the input stream and the definition of normalize newlines in Infra and therefore do no appear as U+000D CARRIAGE RETURN to CSS. [HTML] [INFRA]) However, the character is preserved—and the above rule observable—when encoded using an escape sequence (&#x0d;).

4.1. White Space Collapsing: the white-space-collapse property

Tests

This section has limited direct coverage, but extensive coverage through the white-space shorthand.

Missing tests:


This section is still under discussion and may change in future drafts.

Name: white-space-collapse
Value: collapse | discard | preserve | preserve-breaks | preserve-spaces | break-spaces
Initial: collapse
Applies to: text
Inherited: yes
Percentages: n/a
Computed value: specified keyword
Canonical order: per grammar
Animation type: discrete
Tests

This property specifies whether and how white space is collapsed. Values have the following meanings, which must be interpreted according to the White Space Processing Rules:

collapse
This value directs user agents to collapse sequences of white space into a single character (or in some cases, no character).
Tests

Direct tests as a longhand:


    CSS 2 indirect tests via 'white-space: normal':


    CSS 2 indirect tests via 'white-space: nowrap':


    Indirect tests via 'white-space: normal':


    Indirect tests via 'white-space: nowrap':


    preserve
    This value prevents user agents from collapsing sequences of white space. Segment breaks such as line feeds are preserved as forced line breaks.
    Tests

    Direct tests as a longhand:


      CSS 2 indirect tests via 'white-space: pre':


      Indirect tests via 'white-space: pre':


      Indirect tests via 'white-space: pre-wrap':


      preserve-breaks
      Like collapse, this value collapses consecutive white space characters, but preserves segment breaks in the source as forced line breaks.
      Tests

      Direct tests as a longhand:


      CSS 2 indirect tests via 'white-space: pre-line':


      Indirect tests via 'white-space: pre-line':


      preserve-spaces
      This value prevents user agents from collapsing sequences of white space, and converts tabs and segment breaks to spaces. (This value is intended to represent the behavior of xml:space="preserve" in SVG.)
      break-spaces
      The behavior is identical to that of preserve, except that:

      Note: This value does not guarantee that there will never be any overflow due to white space: for example, if the line length is so short that even a single white space character does not fit, overflow is unavoidable.

      discard
      This value directs user agents to “discard” all white space in the element.
      Tests

      Does this preserve line break opportunities or no? Do we need a distinct "hide" value? If it preserves line break opportunities, maybe it should be replaced with a word-space-transform value?

      White space that was not removed or collapsed due to white space processing is called preserved white space.

      The following style rules implement MathML’s white space processing:

      @namespace m "http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML";
      m|* {
        white-space-collapse: discard;
      }
      m|mi, m|mn, m|mo, m|ms, m|mtext {
        white-space-trim: discard-inner;
      }
      

      4.2. White Space Trimming: the white-space-trim property

      Tests

      This section mostly lacks tests


      Name: white-space-trim
      Value: none | discard-before || discard-after || discard-inner
      Initial: none
      Applies to: inline boxes and block containers
      Inherited: no
      Percentages: n/a
      Computed value: specified keyword(s)
      Canonical order: per grammar
      Animation type: discrete

      This property allows authors to specify trimming behavior at the beginning and end of a box. Values have the following meanings:

      discard-before
      This value directs the UA to collapse all collapsible whitespace immediately before the start of the element.
      discard-after
      This value directs the UA to collapse all collapsible whitespace immediately after the end of the element.
      discard-inner
      For block containers this value directs UAs to discard all whitespace at the beginning of the element up to and including the last segment break before the first non-white-space character in the element as well as to discard all white space at the end of the element starting with the first segment break after the last non-white-space character in the element. For other elements this value directs UAs to discard all whitespace at the beginning and end of the element.
      Tests

      Note: Discarding document white space using white-space-trim can change where soft wrap opportunities occur in the text.

      The following style rules render DT elements as a comma-separated list, even if they are coded on separate lines of the source document:

      dt { display: inline; }
      dt + dt:before { content: ", "; white-space-trim: discard-before; }
      

      The following style rule removes source-formatting white space adjacent to the opening/closing tags of a preformatted block, but not any indentation or interleaved white space applied to the actual contents of the element:

      pre { white-space: pre; white-space-trim: discard-inner; }
      

      This results in the following two source-code snippets:

      <pre>
      
        some
      preformatted
      
        text
      
      </pre>
      
      <pre>  some
      preformatted
      
        text</pre>
      
      rendering identically as:
        some
      preformatted
      
        text

      If instead we apply it to an inline element:

      span { white-space: normal; white-space-trim: discard-inner; }
      
      start[<span>
      
        some
      inline
        text
      
      </span>]end
      
      start[<span>  some
      inline
        text</span>]end
      
      this directs the UA to discard all of the leading/trailing white space before the actual contents of the element:
      start[some inline text]end
      

      White space processing for white-space-trim takes place before § 4.3.1 Phase I: Collapsing and Transformation.

      4.3. The White Space Processing Rules

      Tests

      This section has good test coverage. Most tests to be found in subsections.


      Except where specified otherwise, white space processing in CSS affects only the document white space characters: spaces (U+0020), tabs (U+0009), and segment breaks.

      Tests

      Note: The set of characters considered document white space (part of the document content) and those considered syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax) are not necessarily identical. However, since both include spaces (U+0020), tabs (U+0009), and line feeds (U+000A) most authors won’t notice any differences.

      Besides space (U+0020) and no-break space (U+00A0), Unicode defines a number of additional space separator characters. [UNICODE] In this specification all characters in the Unicode general category Zs except space (U+0020) and no-break space (U+00A0) are collectively referred to as other space separators.

      Tests

      4.3.1. Phase I: Collapsing and Transformation

      Tests

      This section has good test coverage, most parts are well exercised.

      Missing tests:


      Note: white-space-trim is taken into account prior to this phase.

      For each inline (including anonymous inlines; see CSS 2.1 § 9.2.2.1 Anonymous inline boxes [CSS2]) within an inline formatting context, white space characters are processed as follows prior to line breaking and bidi reordering, ignoring bidi formatting characters (characters with the Bidi_Control property [UAX9]) as if they were not there:

      Tests
      Tests
      The following example illustrates the interaction of white-space collapsing and bidirectionality. Consider the following markup fragment, taking special note of spaces (with varied backgrounds and borders for emphasis and identification):
      <ltr>A <rtl> B </rtl> C</ltr>

      where the <ltr> element represents a left-to-right embedding and the <rtl> element represents a right-to-left embedding. If the white-space property is set to normal, the white-space processing model will result in the following:

      This will leave two spaces, one after the A in the left-to-right embedding level, and one after the B in the right-to-left embedding level. The text will then be ordered according to the Unicode bidirectional algorithm, with the end result being:

      A  BC

      Note that there will be two spaces between A and B, and none between B and C. This is best avoided by putting spaces outside the element instead of just inside the opening and closing tags and, where practical, by relying on implicit bidirectionality instead of explicit embedding levels.

      Tests

      4.3.2. Phase II: Trimming and Positioning

      Tests

      This section has good test coverage, all parts are well exercised.


      Then, the entire block is rendered. Inlines are laid out, taking bidi reordering into account, and wrapping as specified by the text-wrap-mode and text-wrap-style property. As each line is laid out,

      1. A sequence of collapsible spaces at the beginning of a line is removed.
        Tests
      2. If the tab size is zero, preserved tabs are not rendered. Otherwise, each preserved tab is rendered as a horizontal shift that lines up the start edge of the next glyph with the next tab stop. If this distance is less than 0.5ch, then the subsequent tab stop is used instead. Tab stops occur at points that are multiples of the tab size from the starting content edge of the preserved tab’s nearest block container ancestor. The tab size is given by the tab-size property.
        Tests

        Note: See the Unicode rules on how tabulation (U+0009) interacts with bidi. [UAX9]

        Tests
      3. A sequence of collapsible spaces at the end of a line is removed, as well as any trailing U+1680   OGHAM SPACE MARK whose white-space-collapse property is collapse or preserve-breaks.
        Tests

        Note: Due to Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm rule L1, a sequence of collapsible spaces located at the end of the line prior to bidi reordering will also be at the end of the line after reordering. [UAX9] [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4]

        Tests
      4. If there remains any sequence of white space, other space separators, and/or preserved tabs at the end of a line (after bidi reordering [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4]):

        What should happen here for white-space-collapse: preserve-spaces?

      This example shows that conditionally hanging white space at the end of lines with forced breaks provides symmetry with the start of the line. An underline is added to help visualize the spaces.
      p {
        white-space: pre-wrap;
        width: 5ch;
        border: solid 1px;
        font-family: monospace;
        text-align: center;
      }
      
      <p> 0 </p>
      

      The sample above would be rendered as follows:

      0

      Since the final space is before a forced line break and does not overflow, it does not hang, and centering works as expected.

      This example illustrates the difference between hanging spaces at the end of lines without forced breaks, and conditionally hanging them at the end of lines with forced breaks. An underline is added to help visualize the spaces.
      p {
        white-space: pre-wrap;
        width: 3ch;
        border: solid 1px;
        font-family: monospace;
      }
      
      <p> 0 0 0 0 </p>
      

      The sample above would be rendered as follows:

      0
      0 0
      0

      If p { text-align: right; } was added, the result would be as follows:

      0
      0 0
      0

      As the preserved spaces at the end of lines without a forced break must hang, they are not considered when placing the rest of the line during text alignment. When aligning towards the end, this means any such spaces will overflow, and will not prevent the rest of the line’s content from being flush with the edge of the line. On the other hand, preserved spaces at the end of a line with a forced break conditionally hang. Since the space at the end of the last line would not overflow in this example, it does not hang and therefore is considered during text alignment.

      In the following example, there is not enough room on any line to fit the end-of-line spaces, so they hang on all lines: the one on the line without a forced break because it must, as well as the one on the line with a forced break, because it conditionally hangs and overflows. An underline is added to help visualize the spaces.
      p {
        white-space: pre-wrap;
        width: 3ch;
        border: solid 1px;
        font-family: monospace;
      }
      
      <p>0 0 0 0 </p>
      
      0 0
      0 0

      The last line is not wrapped before the last 0 because characters that conditionally hang are not considered when measuring the line’s contents for fit.

      4.3.3. Segment Break Transformation Rules

      Tests

      This section has reasonable test coverage, though some assertions are only tested indirectly through test for other features that rely on this, rather than by dedicated tests.


      When white-space-collapse is not collapse, segment breaks are not collapsible. For values other than collapse or preserve-spaces (which transforms them into spaces), segment breaks are instead transformed into a preserved line feed (U+000A).

      Tests

      When white-space-collapse is collapse, segment breaks are collapsible, and are collapsed as follows:

      1. First, any collapsible segment break immediately following another collapsible segment break is removed.
        Tests
      2. Then any remaining segment break is either transformed into a space (U+0020) or removed depending on the context before and after the break. The rules for this operation are UA-defined in this level.
        Tests

        Should we define this for Level 4?

        Note: The white space processing rules have already removed any tabs and spaces around the segment break before this context is evaluated.

      The purpose of the segment break transformation rules (and white space collapsing in general) is to “unbreak” text that has been broken into segments to make the document source code easier to work with. In languages that use word separators, such as English and Korean, “unbreaking” a line requires joining the two lines with a space.
      Here is an English paragraph
      that is broken into multiple lines
      in the source code so that it can
      be more easily read and edited
      in a text editor.
      

      Here is an English paragraph that is broken into multiple lines in the source code so that it can be more easily read and edited in a text editor.

      Eliminating a line break in English requires maintaining a space in its place.

      In languages that have no word separators, such as Chinese, “unbreaking” a line requires joining the two lines with no intervening space.

      這個段落是那麼長,
      在一行寫不行。最好
      用三行寫。
      

      這個段落是那麼長,在一行寫不行。最好用三行寫。

      Eliminating a line break in Chinese requires eliminating any intervening white space.

      The segment break transformation rules can use adjacent context to either transform the segment break into a space or eliminate it entirely.

      Note: Historically, HTML and CSS have unconditionally converted segment breaks to spaces, which has prevented content authored in languages such as Chinese from being able to break lines within the source. Thus UA heuristics need to be conservative about where they discard segment breaks even as they strive to improve support for such languages.

      4.4. Tab Character Size: the tab-size property

      Tests

      This section has good test coverage.

      Missing test:


      Name: tab-size
      Value: <number> | <length>
      Initial: 8
      Applies to: text
      Inherited: yes
      Percentages: n/a
      Computed value: the specified number or absolute length
      Canonical order: n/a
      Animation type: by computed value type
      Tests

      This property determines the tab size used to render preserved tab characters (U+0009). A <number> represents the measure as a multiple of the advance width of the space character (U+0020) of the nearest block container ancestor of the preserved tab, including its associated letter-spacing and word-spacing. Negative values are not allowed.

      Tests

      5. Text Wrapping

      Tests

      Tests mostly not needed for this section: these are definitions, they get tested through their application, not by themselves.


      When inline-level content is laid out into lines, it is broken across line boxes. Such a break is called a line break. When a line is broken due to explicit line-breaking controls (such as a preserved newline character), or due to the start or end of a block, it is a forced line break. When a line is broken due to content wrapping (i.e. when the UA creates unforced line breaks in order to fit the content within the measure), it is a soft wrap break. The process of breaking inline-level content into lines is called line breaking.

      Wrapping is only performed at an allowed break point, called a soft wrap opportunity. When wrapping is enabled (see white-space), the UA must minimize the amount of content overflowing a line by wrapping the line at a soft wrap opportunity, if one exists.

      Tests

      Where text is allowed to wrap is controlled by the line-breaking rules and controls; whether it is allowed to wrap and how multiple soft wrap opportunities within a line are prioritized is controlled by the text-wrap-mode, text-wrap-style, wrap-before, wrap-after, and wrap-inside properties.

      5.1. Text Wrap Setting

      5.1.1. Joint Wrapping Control: the text-wrap shorthand property

      Tests

      This section has limited coverage.


      Name: text-wrap
      Value: <text-wrap-mode> || <text-wrap-style>
      Initial: wrap
      Applies to: see individual properties
      Inherited: see individual properties
      Percentages: see individual properties
      Computed value: see individual properties
      Canonical order: per grammar
      Animation type: see individual properties
      Tests

      TODO: needs review, probably outdated


      This property is a shorthand for text-wrap-mode and text-wrap-style properties. Any omitted longhand is set to its initial value.

      5.1.2. Deciding Whether to Wrap: the text-wrap-mode property

      Tests

      This property is tested extensively through its shorthands, but not directly.

      Missing test:


      Name: text-wrap-mode
      Value: wrap | nowrap
      Initial: wrap
      Applies to: text
      Inherited: yes
      Percentages: n/a
      Computed value: specified keyword
      Canonical order: per grammar
      Animation type: discrete

      The name of this property is a placeholder, pending the CSSWG finding a better name.

      Note: This property is a longhand of both white-space and text-wrap.

      This property specifies whether lines may wrap at unforced soft wrap opportunities. Possible values:

      wrap
      Content may break across lines at allowed soft wrap opportunities, as determined by the line-breaking rules in effect, in order to minimize inline-axis overflow.
      Tests

      tests using wrap directly through text-wrap-mode:


        CSS 2 indirect tests via 'white-space: normal':


        CSS 2 indirect tests via 'white-space: pre-line':


        tests using wrap through 'text-wrap: wrap':


          tests using wrap implicitly through text-wrap:


          tests using wrap through 'white-space: normal':


          tests using wrap through 'white-space: pre-wrap':


          tests using wrap through 'white-space: pre-line':


          tests using wrap through 'white-space: break-spaces':


          Note: See § 5.4 Line Breaking Details for more information about rules and constrains on soft wrap opportunities.

          nowrap
          Inline-level content does not break across lines; content that does not fit within the block container overflows it.
          Tests

          tests using nowrap directly through text-wrap-mode:


            tests using nowrap through 'text-wrap: nowrap':


              CSS 2 indirect tests via 'white-space: pre':


              CSS 2 indirect tests via 'white-space: nowrap':


              tests using nowrap through 'white-space: pre':


              tests using nowrap through 'white-space: nowrap':


              Regardless of the text-wrap-mode value, preserved segment breaks, and any Unicode character with the BK, CR, LF, and NL line breaking class, must be treated as forced line breaks. [UAX14]

              Tests

              Note: The bidi implications of such forced line breaks are defined by the Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm. [UAX9]

              5.1.3. Selecting How to Wrap: the text-wrap-style property

              Tests

              This property has limited coverage.

              Missing test:


              Name: text-wrap-style
              Value: auto| balance | stable | pretty
              Initial: auto
              Applies to: block containers hat establish an inline formatting context
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: discrete

              When wrapping is allowed (see text-wrap-mode), this property selects between several approaches for wrapping lines, trading off between speed, quality and style of layout, or stability. It does not change which soft wrap opportunity exist, but changes how the user agent selects among them. Possible values:

              auto
              The exact algorithm for selecting which soft wrap opportunity to break at is UA-defined. The algorithm may consider multiple lines when making break decisions. The UA may bias for speed over best layout. The UA must not attempt to even out all lines (including the last) as for balance. This value selects the UA’s preferred (or most Web-compatible) wrapping algorithm.
              balance
              Line breaks are chosen to balance the remaining (empty) space in each line box, if better balance than auto is possible. This must not change the number of line boxes the block would contain if text-wrap were set to auto.
              Tests

              The remaining space to consider is that which remains after placing floats and inline content, but before any adjustments due to text justification. Line boxes are balanced when the standard deviation from the average inline-size of the remaining space in each line box is reduced over the block (including lines that end in a forced break).

              Tests

              The exact algorithm is UA-defined.

              UAs may treat this value as auto if there are more than ten lines to balance.

              stable
              Specifies that content on subsequent lines should not be considered when making break decisions so that when editing text any content before the cursor remains stable; otherwise equivalent to auto,
              pretty
              Specifies the UA should bias for better layout over speed, and is expected to consider multiple lines, when making break decisions. Otherwise equivalent to auto,

              Note: The auto value will typically map to Web browsers’ speedy legacy line breaking, which has so far used first-fit/greedy algorithms that can often give sub-optimal results. UAs can experiment with better line breaking algorithms with this default value, but as optimal results often take more time, pretty is offered as an opt-in to take more time for better results. The pretty value is intended for body text, where the last line is expected to be a bit shorter than the average line; the balance value is intended for titles and captions, where equal-length lines of text tend to be preferred; and the stable is intended for sections that are, or are likely become toggled as, editable.

              See thread. Issue is about requiring a minimum length for lines. Common measures seem to be

              Suggestion for value space is match-indent | <length> | <percentage> (with Xch given as an example to make that use case clear). Alternately <integer> could actually count the characters.

              It’s unclear how this would interact with text balancing (above); one earlier proposal had them be the same property (with 100% meaning full balancing).

              People have requested word-based limits, but since this is really dependent on the length of the word, character-based is better.

              5.2. Controlling Breaks Within Boxes: the wrap-inside property

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              Name: wrap-inside
              Value: auto | avoid
              Initial: auto
              Applies to: inline boxes
              Inherited: no
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: discrete
              auto
              Lines may break at allowed break points within the box, as determined by the line-breaking rules in effect.
              avoid
              Line breaking is suppressed within the box: the UA may only break within the box if there are no other valid break points in the line. If the text breaks, line-breaking restrictions are honored as for auto.

              If boxes with avoid are nested and the UA must break within these boxes, a break in an outer box must be used before a break within an inner box may be used.

              5.2.1. Example of using 'wrap-inside: avoid' in presenting a footer

              Tests

              This section does not need tests.


              The priority of breakpoints can be set to reflect the intended grouping of text.

              Given the rules

              footer { wrap-inside: avoid; }
              venue { wrap-inside: avoid; }
              date { wrap-inside: avoid; }
              place { wrap-inside: avoid; }
              

              and the following markup:

              <footer>
              <venue>27th Internationalization and Unicode Conference</venue>
              &#8226; <date>April 7, 2005</date> &#8226;
              <place>Berlin, Germany</place>
              </footer>
              

              In a narrow window the footer could be broken as

              27th Internationalization and Unicode Conference •
              April 7, 2005 • Berlin, Germany
              

              or in a narrower window as

              27th Internationalization and Unicode
              Conference • April 7, 2005 •
              Berlin, Germany
              

              but not as

              27th Internationalization and Unicode Conference • April
              7, 2005 • Berlin, Germany
              

              5.3. Controlling Breaks Between Boxes: the wrap-before/wrap-after properties

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              Name: wrap-before, wrap-after
              Value: auto | avoid | avoid-line | avoid-flex | line | flex
              Initial: auto
              Applies to: inline-level boxes and flex items
              Inherited: no
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: discrete

              These properties specify modifications to break opportunities in line breaking (and flex line breaking [CSS3-FLEXBOX]). Possible values:

              auto
              Lines may break at allowed break points before and after the box, as determined by the line-breaking rules in effect.
              avoid
              Line breaking is suppressed immediately before/after the box: the UA may only break there if there are no other valid break points in the line. If the text breaks, line-breaking restrictions are honored as for auto.
              avoid-line
              Same as avoid, but only for line breaks.
              avoid-flex
              Same as avoid, but only for flex line breaks.
              line
              Force a line break immediately before/after the box if the box is an inline-level box.
              flex
              Force a flex line break immediately before/after the box if the box is a flex item in a multi-line flex container.

              Forced line breaks on inline-level boxes propagate upward through any parent inline boxes the same way forced breaks on block-level boxes propagate upward through any parent block boxes in the same fragmentation context. [CSS3-BREAK]

              5.4. Line Breaking Details

              Tests

              This section has partial test coverage.

              Missing tests:

              Untestable(?):


              When determining line breaks:

              6. Line Breaking and Word Boundaries

              Tests

              This section deals in generalities rather than specific requirements. Exhaustive coverage is neither practical nor needed, as more specific requirements are made in different sections, and can be tested there.

              Nonetheless, this can be a good section to host tests for i18n requirements not covered in detail by the spec.

              Possible additions:


              In most writing systems, in the absence of hyphenation a soft wrap opportunity occurs only at word boundaries. Many such systems use spaces or punctuation to explicitly separate words, and soft wrap opportunities can be identified by these characters.

              Tests

              Scripts such as Thai, Lao, and Khmer, however, do not use spaces or punctuation to separate words. Although the zero width space (U+200B) can be used as an explicit word delimiter in these scripts, this practice is not common. As a result, a lexical resource is needed to correctly identify soft wrap opportunities in such texts.

              Tests

              In some other writing systems, soft wrap opportunities are based on orthographic syllable boundaries, not word boundaries. Some of these systems, notably Brahmic scripts such as Javanese and Balinese, require analysis of the text to find breaking opportunities. Unlike languages that use characters from the SA line breaking class, this analysis does not depend on the content language nor requires (language specific) word boundary detection or a lexical resource.

              Tests

              In others such as Chinese (as well as Japanese, Yi, and sometimes also Korean), each syllable tends to correspond to a single typographic letter unit, and thus line breaking conventions allow the line to break anywhere except between certain character combinations. Additionally the level of strictness in these restrictions varies with the typesetting style.

              Tests

              While CSS does not fully define where soft wrap opportunities occur, some controls are provided to distinguish common variations:

              Note: Unicode Standard Annex #14: Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm defines a baseline behavior for line breaking for all scripts in Unicode, which is expected to be further tailored. [UAX14] More information on line breaking conventions can be found in Requirements for Japanese Text Layout [JLREQ] and Formatting Rules for Japanese Documents [JIS4051] for Japanese, Requirements for Chinese Text Layout [CLREQ] and General Rules for Punctuation [ZHMARK] for Chinese. See also the Internationalization Working Group’s Language Enablement Index which includes more information on additional languages. [TYPOGRAPHY] Any guidance on additional appropriate references would be much appreciated.

              Tests

              Generic line-breaking tests not particularly anchored to any specific spec language


              6.1. Breaking Rules for Letters: the word-break property

              Tests

              This section has partial test coverage.

              Missing tests:


              Name: word-break
              Value: normal | break-all | keep-all | manual | auto-phrase | break-word
              Initial: normal
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: n/a
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              This property specifies soft wrap opportunities between and within “words”, i.e. where it is “normal” and permissible to break lines of text. It focuses on breaks between letters, and does not define whether and how soft wrap opportunities are created by white space and other space separators (though auto-phrase may suppress some), nor around punctuation. (See line-break for controls affecting punctuation and small kana.)

              Tests

              In particular, word-break controls whether a soft wrap opportunity generally exists between adjacent typographic letter units, treating non-letter typographic character units belonging to the NU, AL, AI, or ID Unicode line breaking classes as typographic letter units for this purpose (only). [UAX14]

              For example, in some styles of CJK typesetting, English words are allowed to break between any two letters, rather than only at spaces or hyphenation points; this can be enabled with word-break:break-all.
              A snippet of Japanese text with English in it.
			          The word 'caption' is broken into 'capt' and 'ion' across two lines.
              An example of English text embedded in Japanese being broken at an arbitrary point in the word.

              As another example, Korean has two styles of line-breaking: between any two Korean syllables (word-break: normal) or, like English, mainly at spaces (word-break: keep-all).

              각 줄의 마지막에 한글이 올 때 줄 나눔 기
              준을 “글자” 또는 “어절” 단위로 한다.
              
              각 줄의 마지막에 한글이 올 때 줄 나눔
              기준을 “글자” 또는 “어절” 단위로 한다.
              

              Ethiopic similarly has two styles of line-breaking, either only breaking at word separators (word-break: normal), or also allowing breaks between letters within a word (word-break: break-all).

              ተወልዱ፡ኵሉ፡ሰብእ፡ግዑዛን፡ወዕሩያን፡
              በማዕረግ፡ወብሕግ።ቦሙ፡ኅሊና፡ወዐቅል፡
              ወይትጌበሩ፡አሐዱ፡ምስለ፡አሀዱ፡
              በመንፈሰ፡እኍና።
              
              ተወልዱ፡ኵሉ፡ሰብእ፡ግዑዛን፡ወዕሩያን፡በማ
              ዕረግ፡ወብሕግ።ቦሙ፡ኅሊና፡ወዐቅል፡ወይትጌ
              በሩ፡አሐዱ፡ምስለ፡አሀዱ፡በመንፈሰ፡እኍና።
              

              Values have the following meanings:

              normal
              Words break according to their customary rules, as described above. Korean, which commonly exhibits two different behaviors, allows breaks between any two consecutive Hangul/Hanja. For Ethiopic, which also exhibits two different behaviors, such breaks within words are not allowed.
              Tests

              Some writing systems require specific processing to obtain the customarily expected soft wrap opportunities, as described in § 6.1.1 Analytical Word Breaking.

              break-all
              Breaking is allowed within “words”: specifically, in addition to soft wrap opportunities allowed for normal, any typographic letter units (and any typographic character units resolving to the NU (“numeric”), AL (“alphabetic”), or SA (“Southeast Asian”) line breaking classes [UAX14]) are instead treated as ID (“ideographic characters”) for the purpose of line-breaking. Hyphenation is not applied.
              Tests

              Note: This value does not affect whether there are soft wrap opportunities around punctuation characters. To allow breaks anywhere, see line-break: anywhere.

              Tests

              Note: This option enables the other common behavior for Ethiopic. It is also often used in a context where the text consists predominantly of CJK characters with only short non-CJK excerpts, and it is desired that the text be better distributed on each line.

              keep-all
              Breaking is forbidden within “words”: implicit soft wrap opportunities between typographic letter units (or other typographic character units belonging to the NU, AL, AI, or ID Unicode line breaking classes [UAX14]) are suppressed, i.e. breaks are prohibited between pairs of such characters (regardless of line-break settings other than anywhere) except where opportunities exist due to § 6.1.1.1 Lexical Word Breaking. Otherwise this option is equivalent to normal. In this style, sequences of CJK characters do not break.
              Tests

              Note: This is the other common behavior for Korean (which uses spaces between words), and is also useful for mixed-script text where CJK snippets are mixed into another language that uses spaces for separation.

              manual
              Behaves the same as normal, except that § 6.1.1.1 Lexical Word Breaking must not be performed. Specifically, typographic character units with class SA in [UAX14] must be treated as if they had class AL (i.e. assuming a value of line-break other than anywhere, there is no soft wrap opportunity between pairs of such characters).
              Tests

              Note: This value does not affect syllable-based soft wrap opportunities within words in languages such as Balinese. (See § 6.1.1.2 Orthographic Breaking for some discussion of such writing systems.)

              alternatively, this value could be based on keep-all rather than normal. Yet another variant is to merge this behavior with keep-all.

              Note: Some Southeast Asian languages are commonly misdetected by user agents. With word-break: normal, they would then apply inappropriate language-specific logic to find wrapping opportunities, and place them inappropriately.

              For instance, many languages other than Thai are written using the Thai script, and line-breaking them as if they were Thai will generally produce inadequate—and possibly confusing—results.

              When this occurs, this value enables authors to turn off the word boundary detection built into user agents for word-break: normal, so that they can manually mark up the text to indicate wrapping opportunities and obtain sensible results.

              Authors using this value are expected to manually indicate word boundaries for Southeast Asian languages, using wbr or U+200B. Otherwise, there will be no soft wrap opportunity and the text may overflow.
              auto-phrase
              Behaves the same as normal, except that this value directs the user agent to perform language-specific content analysis to prioritize keeping natural phrases (of multiple words) together.

              If the content language of the element is unknown, or if the user agent does not know how to detect phrase boundaries for that particular language, this value must behave as normal. Otherwise, the user agent should detect phrase boundaries and suppress soft wrap opportunities within each phrase.

              Tests

              Regardless of the content language and support for phrase boundary detection, hyphenation opportunities are suppressed as if hyphens: none had been specified.

              Tests
              Note: Whether a word boundary detection system designed for one language is suitable for some or all dialects of that language is somewhat subjective, and this specifications leaves it at the discretion of the user agent. Even if a detection system is not able to cope with all nuances of a particular dialect, it may be reasonable to claim support if the detection correctly recognizes word boundaries most of the time. However, the user agent would do a disservice to authors and users if it claimed support for languages where it fails to detect most word boundaries or has a high error rate.
              If a user agent has a word-boundary detection system for Cantonese that is not suitable for the broader set of Chinese languages, auto-phrase should have an effect on content marked as lang=yue, lang=zh-yue, or lang=zh-HK, but not lang=zh or lang=zh-Hant.

              However, if the user agent supports a generic word-boundary detection system that is suitable for Chinese in general, auto-phrase should have an effect on content marked with the broad lang=zh characterization, as well as any more specific ones, such as lang=zh-yue, lang=zh-Hant-HK, lang=zh-Hans-SG, or lang=zh-hak.

              Symbols that line-break the same way as letters of a particular category are affected the same way as those letters.

              User agents must not, in response to any value of this property, suppress soft wrap opportunities which are:

              Note: To control additional break opportunities available only in the case of overflow, see overflow-wrap.

              The effects of word-break are taken into account when computing intrinsic sizes.

              Here’s a mixed-script sample text:
              这是一些汉字 and some Latin و کمی خط عربی และตัวอย่างการเขียนภาษาไทย በጽሑፍ፡ማራዘሙን፡አንዳንድ፡
              

              The break-points are determined as follows (indicated by ‘·’):

              word-break: normal
              这·是·一·些·汉·字·and·some·Latin·و·کمی·خط·عربی·และ·ตัวอย่าง·การเขียน·ภาษาไทย·በጽሑፍ፡·ማራዘሙን፡·አንዳንድ፡
              
              word-break: break-all
              这·是·一·些·汉·字·a·n·d·s·o·m·e·L·a·t·i·n·و·ﮐ·ﻤ·ﻰ·ﺧ·ﻁ·ﻋ·ﺮ·ﺑ·ﻰ·แ·ล·ะ·ตั·ว·อ·ย่·า·ง·ก·า·ร·เ·ขี·ย·น·ภ·า·ษ·า·ไ·ท·ย·በ·ጽ·ሑ·ፍ፡·ማ·ራ·ዘ·ሙ·ን፡·አ·ን·ዳ·ን·ድ፡
              
              word-break: keep-all
              这是一些汉字·and·some·Latin·و·کمی·خط·عربی·และ·ตัวอย่าง·การเขียน·ภาษาไทย·በጽሑፍ፡·ማራዘሙን፡·አንዳንድ፡
              

              Japanese is usually typeset allowing line breaks between each syllable. However, it is sometimes preferred to suppress these wrapping opportunities and to only allow wrapping at the end of certain sentence fragments. This is most commonly done in very short pieces of text, such as headings and table or figure captions.

              This can be achieved manually by marking the allowed wrapping points with wbr or U+200B ZERO WIDTH SPACE, and suppressing the other ones using word-break: keep-all.

              Alternatively, in user agents that support detection of phrases boundaries in Japanese, the same results can be achieved automatically by using word-break: auto-phrase (assuming the content language is specified).

              Sample markup and style rule Expected rendering Result in your browser
              <h1>
              窓ぎわの<wbr>トットちゃん
              </h1>
              
              h1 {
                word-break: normal;
              }
              窓ぎわのトッ
              トちゃん
              
              窓ぎわのトットちゃん
              <h1>
              窓ぎわの<wbr>トットちゃん
              </h1>
              
              h1 {
                word-break: keep-all;
              }
              窓ぎわの
              トットちゃん
              
              窓ぎわのトットちゃん
              <h1 lang=ja>
              窓ぎわのトットちゃん
              </h1>
              
              h1 {
                word-break: auto-phrase;
              }
              窓ぎわの
              トットちゃん
              
              窓ぎわのトットちゃん

              When shaping scripts such as Arabic are allowed to break within words due to break-all the characters must still be shaped as if the word were not broken.

              Tests

              For compatibility with legacy content, the word-break property also supports a deprecated break-word keyword. When specified, this has the same effect as word-break: normal and overflow-wrap: anywhere, regardless of the actual value of the overflow-wrap property.

              Tests

              6.1.1. Analytical Word Breaking

              6.1.1.1. Lexical Word Breaking
              Tests

              This section has basic but adequate coverage


              To provide the expected normal behavior for Southeast Asian languages, typographic character units with line breaking class SA in [UAX14] must be treated as if they had class AL. However, the user agent must additionally analyze the content of a run of such characters to detect word boundaries and treat each boundary as a soft wrap opportunities.

              Tests

              As various languages can be written in scripts which use the characters with class SA, if the content language is known, the user agent should use this information to tailor its analysis.

              Tests
              6.1.1.2. Orthographic Breaking
              Tests

              This section is untested.


              For scripts (such as Balinese) that use line breaking based on orthographic syllables, the UA must analyze the content to find the correct points to insert soft wrap opportunities.

              Note: At the time of writing, Unicode does not define how to perform this analysis, and treats all characters in these writing systems as having line breaking class AL. However, a proposal has been made to solve that issue. Even though it is not final, it can be informative to consult. [L2-22-080R]

              6.1.1.3. Fallback Breaking
              Tests

              This section has basic but adequate coverage


              In order to avoid unexpected overflow, if the user agent is unable to perform the requisite lexical or orthographic analysis for line breaking any content language that requires it—for example due to lacking a dictionary for languages written in characters with class SA—it must assume a soft wrap opportunity between pairs of typographic letter units in that writing system.

              Tests

              Note: This provision is not triggered merely when the UA fails to find a word boundary in a particular text run; the text run may well be a single unbreakable word. It applies for example when a text run is composed of Khmer characters (U+1780 to U+17FF) if the user agent does not know how to determine word boundaries in Khmer.

              6.1.2. Expressing User Preferences for Phrase-based Line Breaking

              Tests

              This section is untested, but it is not clear how it could be.


              User agents may activate language-specific content analysis described in auto-phrase in response to user preferences. User agents with this behavior must do this by setting the declared value of word-break to auto-phrase in the user origin.

              Note: This allows authors to detect whether or not this feature is enabled by calling getComputedStyle(), or to override it in the author origin where appropriate.

              6.2. Line Breaking Strictness: the line-break property

              Tests

              This section has extensive test coverage for CJK.

              Missing tests:

              Untestable(?):


              Name: line-break
              Value: auto | loose | normal | strict | anywhere
              Initial: auto
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: n/a
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              This property specifies the strictness of line-breaking rules applied within an element: especially how wrapping interacts with punctuation and symbols. Values have the following meanings:

              auto
              The UA determines the set of line-breaking restrictions to use, and it may vary the restrictions based on the length of the line; e.g., use a less restrictive set of line-break rules for short lines.
              loose
              Breaks text using the least restrictive set of line-breaking rules. Typically used for short lines, such as in newspapers.
              normal
              Breaks text using the most common set of line-breaking rules.
              strict
              Breaks text using the most stringent set of line-breaking rules.
              anywhere
              There is a soft wrap opportunity around every typographic character unit, including around any punctuation character or preserved white spaces, or in the middle of words, disregarding any prohibition against line breaks, even those introduced by characters with the GL, WJ, or ZWJ line breaking classes or mandated by the word-break property. [UAX14] The different wrapping opportunities must not be prioritized. Hyphenation is not applied.
              Tests

              Note: This value triggers the line breaking rules typically seen in terminals.

              Note: This values does not create line breaking opportunities inside of a single typographic character unit, and does not override the CM and SG Unicode line breaking classes. [UAX14].

              Note: anywhere only allows preserved white spaces at the end of the line to be wrapped to the next line when white-space is set to break-spaces, because in other cases:

              When it does have an effect on preserved white space, with white-space: break-spaces, it allows breaking before the first space of a sequence, which break-spaces on its own does not.

              Tests

              CSS distinguishes between four levels of strictness in the rules for text wrapping. The precise set of rules in effect for each of loose, normal, and strict is up to the UA and should follow language conventions. However, this specification does require that:

              Note: The requirements listed above only create distinctions in CJK text. In an implementation that matches only the rules above, and no additional rules, line-break would only affect CJK code points unless the writing system is tagged as Chinese or Japanese. Future levels may add additional specific rules for other writing systems and languages as their requirements become known.

              As UAs can add additional distinctions between strict/normal/loose modes, these values can exhibit differences in other writing systems as well. For example, a UA with sufficiently-advanced Thai language processing ability could choose to map different levels of strictness in Thai line-breaking to these keywords, e.g. disallowing breaks within compound words in strict mode (e.g. breaking ตัวอย่างการเขียนภาษาไทย as ตัวอย่าง·การเขียน·ภาษาไทย) while allowing more breaks in loose (ตัวอย่าง·การ·เขียน·ภาษา·ไทย).

              Note: The CSSWG recognizes that in a future edition of the specification finer control over line breaking may be necessary to satisfy high-end publishing requirements.

              6.3. Hyphenation: Morphological Breaking Within Words

              6.3.1. Hyphenation Control: the hyphens property

              Tests

              This section has partial test coverage.

              Missing tests:


              Hyphenation is the controlled splitting of words where they usually would not be allowed to break to improve the layout of paragraphs, typically splitting words at syllabic or morphemic boundaries and visually indicating the split (usually by inserting a hyphen, U+2010). In some cases, hyphenation may also alter the spelling of a word. Regardless, hyphenation is a rendering effect only: it must have no effect on the underlying document content or on text selection or searching.

              Tests
              Hyphenation Across Languages Hyphenation practices vary across languages, and can involve not just inserting a hyphen before the line break, but inserting a hyphen after the break (or both), inserting a different character than U+2010, or changing the spelling of the word.
              Language Unbroken Before After
              English Unbroken Un‐ broken
              Dutch cafeetje café‐ tje
              Hungarian Összeg Ösz‐ szeg
              Mandarin tú’àn tú‐ àn
              àizēng‐fēnmíng àizēng‐ ‐fēnmíng
              Uyghur  [isolated DAL + isolated ALEF + initial MEEM +
					          medial YEH  + final DAL +
					          isolated ALEF MAKSURA] [isolated DAL + isolated ALEF + initial MEEM +
					          final YEH + hyphen ] [ isolated DAL + isolated ALEF MAKSURA]
              Tests

              Hyphenation occurs when the line breaks at a valid hyphenation opportunity, which is a type of soft wrap opportunity that exists within a word where hyphenation is allowed. In CSS hyphenation opportunities are controlled with the hyphens property. CSS Text Level 3 does not define the exact rules for hyphenation; however UAs are strongly encouraged to optimize their choice of break points and to chose language-appropriate hyphenation points.

              Tests

              Note: The soft wrap opportunity introduced by the U+002D - HYPHEN-MINUS character or the U+2010 ‐ HYPHEN character is not a hyphenation opportunity, as no visual indication of the split is created when wrapping: these characters are visible whether the line is wrapped at that point or not.

              Hyphenation opportunities are considered when calculating min-content intrinsic sizes.

              Tests

              Note: This allows tables to hyphenate their contents instead of overflowing their containing block, which is particularly important in long-word languages like German.

              Name: hyphens
              Value: none | manual | auto
              Initial: manual
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: n/a
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              This property controls whether hyphenation is allowed to create more soft wrap opportunities within a line of text. Values have the following meanings:

              none
              Words are not hyphenated, even if characters inside the word explicitly define hyphenation opportunities.

              Note: This does not suppress the existing soft wrap opportunities introduced by always visible characters such as U+002D - HYPHEN-MINUS or U+2010 ‐ HYPHEN.

              Tests
              manual
              Words are only hyphenated where there are characters inside the word that explicitly suggest hyphenation opportunities. The UA must use the appropriate language-specific hyphenation character(s) and should apply any appropriate spelling changes just as for automatic hyphenation at the same point.
              Tests
              In Unicode, U+00AD is a conditional "soft hyphen" and U+2010 is an unconditional hyphen. Unicode Standard Annex #14 describes the role of soft hyphens in Unicode line breaking. [UAX14] In HTML, &shy; represents the soft hyphen character, which suggests a hyphenation opportunity.
              ex&shy;ample
              auto
              Words may be broken at hyphenation opportunities determined automatically by a language-appropriate hyphenation resource in addition to those indicated explicitly by a conditional hyphen. Automatic hyphenation opportunities elsewhere within a word must be ignored if the word contains a conditional hyphen (&shy; or U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN), in favor of the conditional hyphen(s). However, if, even after breaking at such opportunities, a portion of that word is still too long to fit on one line, an automatic hyphenation opportunity may be used.
              Tests

              Correct automatic hyphenation requires a hyphenation resource appropriate to the language of the text being broken. The UA must therefore only automatically hyphenate text for which the content language is known and for which it has an appropriate hyphenation resource.

              Tests
              Authors should correctly tag their content’s language (e.g. using the HTML lang attribute or XML xml:lang attribute) in order to obtain correct automatic hyphenation.

              The UA may use language-tailored heuristics to exclude certain words from automatic hyphenation. For example, a UA might try to avoid hyphenation in proper nouns by excluding words matching certain capitalization and punctuation patterns. Such heuristics are not defined by this specification. (Note that such heuristics will need to vary by language: English and German, for example, have very different capitalization conventions.)

              For the purpose of the hyphens property, what constitutes a “word” is UA-dependent. However, inline element boundaries and out-of-flow elements must be ignored when determining word boundaries.

              Tests

              Any glyphs shown due to hyphenation at a hyphenation opportunity created by a conditional hyphen character (such as U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN) are represented by that character and are styled according to the properties applied to it.

              Tests

              When shaping scripts such as Arabic are allowed to break within words due to hyphenation, the characters must still be shaped as if the word were not broken.

              Tests
              For example, if the Uyghur word “داميدى” were hyphenated, it would appear as [isolated DAL + isolated ALEF + initial MEEM +
		          medial YEH + hyphen + line-break + final DAL +
		          isolated ALEF MAKSURA] not as [isolated DAL + isolated ALEF + initial MEEM +
		          final YEH + hyphen + line-break + isolated DAL +
		          isolated ALEF MAKSURA] .

              6.3.2. Hyphens: the hyphenate-character property

              Tests

              This section has partial coverage.

              Missing tests:

              Likely untestable:


              Name: hyphenate-character
              Value: auto | <string>
              Initial: auto
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              This property specifies the string that is shown between parts of hyphenated words. Values have the following meanings:

              auto
              Specifies that the user agent should find an appropriate string based on the content language’s typographic conventions, possibly from the same source as the hyphenation dictionary.
              <string>
              Specifies the string that appears at the hyphenation break when hyphenating. (The position of this string is not affected: the UA must insert the string according to the typographic conventions of the content language, defaulting to immediately before the hyphenation break.) The UA may truncate the used value to a limited number of typographic character units; it must not truncate only part of a typographic character unit.
              Tests

              Note: Specifying the empty string "" is valid, and causes the UA to break at hyphenation opportunities without inserting a visible hyphenation character.

              Tests
              The hyphen character (U+2010) is most typically used to indicate that a word has been split. However, hyphenate-character can be used to specify a different type of hyphen when necessary.
              [lang]:lang(ojs) { hyphenate-character: "᐀" /* CANADIAN SYLLABICS HYPHEN (U+1400) */ }
              

              Note: Both hyphens triggered by automatic hyphenation and hyphens triggered by soft hyphens are rendered according to hyphenate-character.

              6.3.3. Hyphenation Size Limit: the hyphenate-limit-zone property

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              Name: hyphenate-limit-zone
              Value: <length-percentage>
              Initial: 0
              Applies to: block containers
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: refers to length of the line box
              Computed value: computed <length-percentage> value
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: by computed value type

              Is hyphenate-limit-zone a good name? Comments/suggestions?

              This property specifies the maximum amount of unfilled space (before justification) that may be left in the line box before hyphenation is triggered to pull part of a word from the next line back up into the current line.

              6.3.4. Hyphenation Character Limits: the hyphenate-limit-chars property

              Tests

              This section has limited coverage.

              Missing tests:


              Name: hyphenate-limit-chars
              Value: [ auto | <integer> ]{1,3}
              Initial: auto
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: three values, each either the auto keyword or an integer
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: by computed value type
              Tests

              This property specifies the minimum number of characters in a hyphenated word. If the word does not meet the required minimum number of characters in the word / before the hyphen / after the hyphen, then the word must not be hyphenated. Nonspacing combining marks (Unicode General Category Mn) and intra-word punctuation (Unicode General Category P*) do not count towards the minimum.

              If three values are specified, the first value is the required minimum for the total characters in a word, the second value is the minimum for characters before the hyphenation point, and the third value is the minimum for characters after the hyphenation point. If the third value is missing, it is the same as the second. If the second value is missing, then it is auto. The auto value means that the UA chooses a value that adapts to the current layout.

              Tests

              Note: Unless the UA is able to calculate a better value, it is suggested that auto means 2 for before and after, and 5 for the word total.

              In the example below, the minimum size of a hyphenated word is left to the UA (which means it may vary depending on the language, the length of the line, or other factors), but the minimum number of characters before and after the hyphenation point is set to 3.
              p { hyphenate-limit-chars: auto 3; }
              

              6.3.5. Hyphenation Line Limits: the hyphenate-limit-lines and hyphenate-limit-last properties

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              Name: hyphenate-limit-lines
              Value: no-limit | <integer>
              Initial: no-limit
              Applies to: block containers
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword or integer
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: by computed value type

              This property indicates the maximum number of successive hyphenated lines in an element. The no-limit value means that there is no limit.

              In some cases, user agents may not be able to honor the specified value. (See overflow-wrap.) It is not defined whether hyphenation introduced by such emergency breaking influences nearby hyphenation points.

              Name: hyphenate-limit-last
              Value: none | always | column | page | spread
              Initial: none
              Applies to: block containers
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: discrete

              This property indicates hyphenation behavior at the end of elements, column, pages, and spreads. A spread is a set of two pages that are visible to the reader at the same time. Values have the following meanings:

              none
              No restrictions imposed.
              always
              The last full line of the element, or the last line before any column, page, or spread break inside the element should not be hyphenated.
              column
              The last line before any column, page, or spread break inside the element should not be hyphenated.
              page
              The last line before page or spread break inside the element should not be hyphenated.
              spread
              The last line before any spread break inside the element should not be hyphenated.
              p { hyphenate-limit-last: always }
              div.chapter {  hyphenate-limit-last: spread }
              

              A paragraph may be formatted like this when hyphenate-limit-last: none is set:

              This is just a
              simple example
              to show Antarc-
              tica.
              

              With 'hyphenate-limit-last: always' one would get:

              This is just a
              simple example
              to        show
              Antarctica.
              

              6.4. Overflow Wrapping: the overflow-wrap/word-wrap property

              Tests

              This section has fairly good test coverage.

              Missing tests:


              Name: overflow-wrap, word-wrap
              Value: normal | break-word | anywhere
              Initial: normal
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: n/a
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              This property specifies whether the UA may break at otherwise disallowed points within a line to prevent overflow, when an otherwise-unbreakable string is too long to fit within the line box. It only has an effect when white-space allows wrapping. Possible values:

              Tests
              normal
              Lines may break only at allowed break points. However, the restrictions introduced by word-break: keep-all may be relaxed to match word-break: normal if there are no otherwise-acceptable break points in the line.
              Tests

              Also, the restrictions introduced by word-break: auto-phrase are relaxed if there are no otherwise-acceptable break points in the line:

              The soft wrap opportunities obtained by relaxing the restrictions introduced by word-break: keep-all and word-break: auto-phrase are not considered when calculating min-content intrinsic sizes.

              anywhere
              An otherwise unbreakable sequence of characters may be broken at an arbitrary point if there are no otherwise-acceptable break points in the line. Shaping characters are still shaped as if the word were not broken, and grapheme clusters must stay together as one unit. No hyphenation character is inserted at the break point. Soft wrap opportunities introduced by anywhere are considered when calculating min-content intrinsic sizes.
              Tests

              In the case of word-break: auto-phrase, these additional soft wrap opportunities are only introduced if relaxing the restrictions introduced by word-break: auto-phrase as described in overflow-wrap: normal is insufficient to prevent overflow.

              break-word
              As for anywhere except that soft wrap opportunities introduced by break-word are not considered when calculating min-content intrinsic sizes.
              Tests

              Do we need to add a none value to overflow-wrap to opt out of relaxing the keep-all' and auto-phrase'' restrictions as allowed by overflow-wrap: normal?

              For legacy reasons, UAs must treat word-wrap as a legacy name alias of the overflow-wrap property.

              Tests

              7. Alignment and Justification

              Tests

              Tests only needed in subsections.


              Alignment and justification controls how inline content is distributed within a line box.

              7.1. Text Alignment: the text-align shorthand

              Tests

              This section has partial test coverage.

              Missing tests:


              Name: text-align
              Value: start | end | left | right | center | <string> | justify | match-parent | justify-all
              Initial: start
              Applies to: block containers
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: see individual properties
              Computed value: see individual properties
              Animation type: discrete
              Canonical order: n/a
              Tests

              This shorthand property sets the text-align-all and text-align-last properties and describes how the inline-level content of a block is aligned along the inline axis if the content does not completely fill the line box. Values other than justify-all or match-parent are assigned to text-align-all and reset text-align-last to auto.

              Values have the following meanings:

              start
              Inline-level content is aligned to the start edge of the line box.
              Tests
              end
              Inline-level content is aligned to the end edge of the line box.
              Tests
              left
              Inline-level content is aligned to the line-left edge of the line box. (In vertical writing modes, this can be either the physical top or bottom, depending on writing-mode.) [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4]
              Tests
              • text-align-001.xht (visual test) (source)
              • text-align-bidi-001.xht (visual test) (source)
              • text-align-bidi-006.xht (visual test) (source)
              • text-align-bidi-007.xht (visual test) (source)
              right
              Inline-level content is aligned to the line-right edge of the line box. (In vertical writing modes, this can be either the physical top or bottom, depending on writing-mode.) [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4]
              Tests
              • text-align-002.xht (visual test) (source)
              • text-align-bidi-005.xht (visual test) (source)
              center
              Inline-level content is centered within the line box.
              Tests
              • text-align-003.xht (visual test) (source)
              • text-align-bidi-002.xht (visual test) (source)
              • text-align-bidi-003.xht (visual test) (source)
              • text-align-bidi-004.xht (visual test) (source)
              • text-align-inherit-001.xht (visual test) (source)
              <string>
              The string must be a single character; otherwise the declaration is invalid and must be ignored. When applied to a table cell, specifies the alignment character around which the cell’s contents will align. See below for further details and how this value combines with keywords.
              justify
              Text is justified according to the method specified by the text-justify property, in order to exactly fill the line box. Unless otherwise specified by text-align-last, the last line before a forced break or the end of the block is start-aligned.
              Tests
              justify-all
              Sets both text-align-all and text-align-last to justify, forcing the last line to justify as well.
              Tests
              match-parent
              This value behaves the same as inherit (computes to its parent’s computed value) except that an inherited value of start or end is interpreted against the parent’s direction value and results in a computed value of either left or right. Computes to start when specified on the root element.
              Tests

              When specified on the text-align shorthand, sets both text-align-all and text-align-last to match-parent.

              Tests

              A block of text is a stack of line boxes. This property specifies how the inline-level boxes within each line box align with respect to the start and end sides of the line box. Alignment is not with respect to the viewport or containing block.

              In the case of justify, the UA may stretch or shrink any inline boxes by adjusting their text. (See text-justify.) If an element’s white space is not collapsible, then the UA is not required to adjust its text for the purpose of justification and may instead treat the text as having no justification opportunities. If the UA chooses to adjust the text, then it must ensure that tab stops continue to line up as required by the white space processing rules.

              Tests

              If (after justification, if any) the inline contents of a line box are too long to fit within it, then the contents are start-aligned: any content that doesn’t fit overflows the line box’s end edge.

              See § 9.3 Bidirectionality and Line Boxes for details on how to determine the start and end edges of a line box.

              7.2. Character-based Alignment in a Table Column

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              When multiple cells in a column have an alignment character specified, the alignment character of each such cell in the column is centered along a single column-parallel axis and the rest of the text in the column shifted accordingly. (Note that the strings do not have to be the same for each cell, although they usually are.)

              Is this intended to say that it’s the centers of the alignment characters that should be aligned? It’s not clear that’s what it says, but that (or a different behavior) needs to be specified, to describe what happens when different occurrences of the alignment character are in different fonts. (Further, is that the intended behavior? Probably the most significant use case to consider is bold vs. non-bold text, which only varies slightly in width.) [feedback] [minutes face-to-face 2016-02-02 10:00 AM]

              The following style sheet:

              TD { text-align: "." center }
              

              will cause the column of dollar figures in the following HTML table:

              <TABLE>
              <COL width="40">
              <TR> <TH>Long distance calls
              <TR> <TD> $1.30
              <TR> <TD> $2.50
              <TR> <TD> $10.80
              <TR> <TD> $111.01
              <TR> <TD> $85.
              <TR> <TD> N/A
              <TR> <TD> $.05
              <TR> <TD> $.06
              </TABLE>
              

              to align along the decimal point. The table might be rendered as follows:

              +---------------------+
              | Long distance calls |
              +---------------------+
              |         $1.30       |
              |         $2.50       |
              |        $10.80       |
              |       $111.01       |
              |        $85.         |
              |        N/A          |
              |          $.05       |
              |          $.06       |
              +---------------------+
              

              A keyword value may be specified in conjunction with the <string> value; if it is not given, it defaults to right. This value is used:

              Note: Right alignment is used by default for character-based alignment because numbering systems are almost all left-to-right even in right-to-left writing systems, and the primary use case of character-based alignment is for numerical alignment.

              If the alignment character appears more than once in the text, the first instance is used for alignment. If the alignment character does not appear in a cell at all, the string is aligned as if the alignment character had been inserted at the end of its contents.

              This needs to specify what text is searched for the alignment character. Is it only in-flow text whose containing block is the cell? Or is text within any in-flow descendants in the block formatting context established by the cell considered? If so, is it considered only as long as its text-align property is consistent with the cell’s? (Consistent in the alignment character, or fully consistent?)

              This behavior of aligning as though the alignment character had been inserted at the end of the contents of the cell, combined with center-of-character alignment, will produce gaps on the end-side of lines that are alone on a line with <string> text-alignment, when none of the lines of the column has the alignment character, or, more importantly, when some of the lines do have the alignment character, but the column is not laid out at its max-content width. This is probably undesirable.

              When the alignment character is inserted at the end of the contents, which font is used? (In particular, if the alignment character might be within a descendant block, is it the font of the block or the font of the table cell? Or if the insertion is at a forced break within an inline, does it use the font of the inline or the font of the block or cell?)

              Character-based alignment occurs before table cell width computation so that auto width computations can leave enough space for alignment. Whether column-spanning cells participate in the alignment prior to or after width computation is undefined. If width constraints on the cell contents prevent full alignment throughout the column, the resulting alignment is undefined.

              This should have a formal definition of how character alignment affects the min-content and max-content intrinsic widths (of table columns and all content that can be inside table columns). Max-content intrinsic widths need to be split into three numbers (assuming that it’s the centers of the alignment character that are aligned): one for widths without alignment characters, one for widths on the inline-start side of the center of the alignment character, one for widths on the inline-end side of the center of the alignment character. This operates based on all segments of text between forced breaks for max-content widths. For min-content widths, segments of text between forced breaks that contain optional breaks within them should clearly contribute only to the without-alignment-character width. However, it’s less clear whether all min-content widths should work this way, or whether segments between forced breaks that do not have optional breaks (and perhaps only those that actually contain the alignment character) should contribute to start-side-of-alignment-character and end-side-of-alignment-character min-content widths instead; this choice is a tradeoff between the meaning of min-content sizing of a table meaning the narrowest reasonable size versus honoring alignment characters in more cases. Another option might be to use whether line-breaking of optional breaks is allowed as a control for which behavior to use.

              Formally defining the intrinsic width contributions of column-spanning cells with <string> values of text-align is a complicated (although straightforward) extension of the decisions made for intrinsic width contributions of non-column-spanning cells; this should also be formally defined. Contributions end up being made to the split intrinsic widths of the startmost or endmost column (whichever is used for alignment), and to the without-alignment-character intrinsic widths of the other spanned columns.

              7.3. Default Text Alignment: the text-align-all property

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              Name: text-align-all
              Value: start | end | left | right | center | justify | match-parent
              Initial: start
              Applies to: block containers
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: keyword as specified, except for match-parent which computes as defined above
              Canonical order: n/a
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              This longhand of the text-align shorthand property specifies the inline alignment of all lines of inline content in the block container, except for last lines overridden by a non-auto value of text-align-last. See text-align for a full description of values.

              Authors should use the text-align shorthand instead of this property.

              7.4. Last Line Alignment: the text-align-last property

              Tests

              This section has fairly good test coverage: all value combinations for text-align / text-align-last are exercised, except for text-align-last: match-parent (which is exercised, but in a more limited way).

              Missing tests:


              Name: text-align-last
              Value: auto | start | end | left | right | center | justify | match-parent
              Initial: auto
              Applies to: block containers
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: n/a
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              This property describes how the last line of a block or a line right before a forced line break is aligned.

              Tests

              If auto is specified, content on the affected line is aligned per text-align-all unless text-align-all is set to justify, in which case it is start-aligned. All other values are interpreted as described for text-align.

              Tests

              7.5. Justification Method: the text-justify property

              Tests

              This section has light test coverage. All values (other than auto) are tested, but the tests are minimal. Not sure we can do better though.

              Missing tests:

              Untestable(?):


              Name: text-justify
              Value: [ auto | none | inter-word | inter-character | ruby ] || no-compress
              Initial: auto
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword (except for the distribute legacy value)
              Canonical order: n/a
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              This property selects the justification method used when a line’s alignment is set to justify (see text-align). The property applies to text, but is inherited from block containers to the root inline box containing their inline-level contents. It takes the following values:

              Tests
              auto
              The UA determines the justification algorithm to follow, based on a balance between performance and adequate presentation quality. Since justification rules vary by writing system and language, UAs should, where possible, use a justification algorithm appropriate to the text.
              Tests
              For example, the UA could use by default a justification method that is a simple universal compromise for all writing systems—such as primarily expanding word separators and between CJK typographic letter units along with secondarily expanding between Southeast Asian typographic letter units. Then, in cases where the content language of the paragraph is known, it could choose a more language-tailored justification behavior e.g. following the Requirements for Japanese Text Layout for Japanese [JLREQ], using cursive elongation for Arabic, using inter-word for German, etc.

              Two lines of calligraphic Arabic end together
				          due to a mix of compressed and swash forms.

              An example of cursively-justified Arabic text, rendered by Tasmeem. Like English, Arabic can be justified by adjusting the spacing between words, but in most styles it can also be justified by calligraphically elongating or compressing the letterforms themselves. In this example, the upper text is extended to fill the line by the use of elongated (kashida) forms and swash forms, while the bottom line is compressed slightly by using a stacked combination for the characters between ت and م. By employing traditional calligraphic techniques, a typesetter can justify the line while preserving flow and color, providing a very high quality justification effect. However, this is by its nature a very script-specific effect.
              Extra space is partly to spaces and partly among CJK and Thai letters.
              Mixed-script text with text-justify: auto: this interpretation uses a universal-compromise justification method, expanding at spaces as well as between CJK and Southeast Asian letters. This effectively uses inter-word + inter-ideograph spacing for lines that have word-separators and/or CJK characters and falls back to inter-cluster behavior for lines that don’t or for which the space stretches too far.
              none
              Justification is disabled: there are no justification opportunities within the text.
              Tests
              No extra space is inserted.
              Mixed-script text with text-justify: none

              Note: This value is intended for use in user stylesheets to improve readability or for accessibility purposes.

              inter-word
              Justification adjusts spacing at word separators only (effectively varying the used word-spacing on the line). This behavior is typical for languages that separate words using spaces, like English or Korean.
              Tests
              Extra space is equally distributed mainly to spaces.
              Mixed-script text with text-justify: inter-word
              inter-character
              Justification adjusts spacing between each pair of adjacent typographic character units (effectively varying the used letter-spacing on the line). This value is sometimes used in East Asian systems such as Japanese.
              Tests
              • text-justify-002.html (visual test) (source)
              Extra space is equally distributed
				          at points between spaces and letters of all writing systems.
              Mixed-script text with text-justify: inter-character

              For legacy reasons, UAs must also support the alternate keyword distribute which must compute to inter-character, thus having the exact same meaning and behavior. UAs may treat this as a legacy value alias.

              Tests
              ruby
              Justification adjusts spacing as for auto except:

              Note: This value is intended for use in ruby annotations, providing a reasonable default alignment. See [CSS-RUBY-1].

              no-compress
              Justification must not compress spacing controlled by text-spacing-trim or text-autospace. (If this value is not specified, the justification process may reduce such spacing except when the spacing is at the start or end of the line.)

              Note: An example of compression rules is given for Japanese in 3.8 Line Adjustment in [JLREQ].

              This keyword used to be part of text-spacing; it might need renaming to be more specific now that it’s here, as it implies that e.g. U+0020 cannot be compressed. [Issue #7079]

              Since optimal justification is language-sensitive, authors should correctly language-tag their content for the best results.

              Note: The guidelines in this level of CSS do not describe a complete justification algorithm. They are merely a minimum set of requirements that a complete algorithm should meet. Limiting the set of requirements gives UAs some latitude in choosing a justification algorithm that meets their needs and desired balance of quality, speed, and complexity.

              7.5.1. Expanding and Compressing Text

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.

              Missing tests:


              When justifying text, the user agent takes the remaining space between the ends of a line’s contents and the edges of its line box, and distributes that space throughout its content so that the contents exactly fill the line box. The user agent may alternatively distribute negative space, putting more content on the line than would otherwise fit under normal spacing conditions.

              A justification opportunity is a point where the justification algorithm may alter spacing within the text. A justification opportunity can be provided by a single typographic character unit (such as a word separator), or by the juxtaposition of two typographic character units. As with controls for soft wrap opportunities, whether a typographic character unit provides a justification opportunity is controlled by the text-justify value of its parent; similarly, whether a justification opportunity exists between two consecutive typographic character units is determined by the text-justify value of their nearest common ancestor.

              Space distributed by justification is in addition to the spacing defined by the letter-spacing or word-spacing properties. When such additional space is distributed to a word separator justification opportunity, it is applied under the same rules as for word-spacing. Similarly, when space is distributed to a justification opportunity between two typographic character units, should be applied under the same rules as for letter-spacing.

              A justification algorithm may divide justification opportunities into different priority levels. All justification opportunities within a given level are expanded or compressed at the same priority, regardless of which typographic character units created that opportunity. For example, if justification opportunities between two Han characters and between two Latin letters are defined to be at the same level (as they are in the inter-character justification style), they are not treated differently because they originate from different typographic character units. It is not defined in this level whether or how other factors (such as font size, letter-spacing, glyph shape, position within the line, etc.) may influence the distribution of space to justification opportunities within the line.

              The UA may enable or break optional ligatures or use other font features such as alternate glyphs or glyph compression to help justify the text under any method. This behavior is not controlled by this level of CSS. However, UAs must not break required ligatures or otherwise disable features required to correctly shape complex scripts.

              If a justification opportunity exists within a line, and text alignment specifies full justification (justify) for that line, it must be justified.

              7.5.2. Handling Symbols and Punctuation

              Tests

              This section lacks tests. Not sure what is testable though.


              When determining justification opportunities, a typographic character unit from the Unicode Symbols (S*) and Punctuation (P*) classes is generally treated the same as a typographic letter unit of the same script (or, if the character’s script property is Common, then as a typographic letter unit of the dominant script).

              However, by typographic tradition there may be additional rules controlling the justification of symbols and punctuation. Therefore, the UA may reassign specific characters or introduce additional levels of prioritization to handle justification opportunities involving symbols and punctuation.

              For example, there are traditionally no justification opportunities between consecutive U+2014 — EM DASH, U+2015 ― HORIZONTAL BAR, U+2026 … HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS, or U+2025 ‥ TWO DOT LEADER characters [JLREQ]; thus a UA might assign these characters to a “never” prioritization level. As another example, certain full-width punctuation characters (such as U+301A 〚 LEFT WHITE SQUARE BRACKET) are considered to contain a justification opportunity in Japanese. The UA might therefore assign these characters to a higher prioritization level than the opportunities between ideographic characters.

              7.5.3. Unexpandable Text

              Tests

              This section has basic test coverage.

              Missing tests:


              If the inline contents of a line cannot be stretched to the full width of the line box, then they must be aligned as specified by the text-align-last property. (If text-align-last is justify, then they must be aligned as for center.)

              Tests

              7.5.4. Cursive Scripts

              Tests

              This section lacks automated tests.


              Justification must not introduce gaps between the joined typographic letter units of cursive scripts such as Arabic. If it is able, the UA may translate space distributed to justification opportunities within a run of such typographic letter units into some form of cursive elongation for that run. It otherwise must assume that no justification opportunity exists between any pair of typographic letter units in cursive script (regardless of whether they join).

              Tests
              The following are examples of unacceptable justification:
              Adding gaps between every pair of Arabic letters
              Adding gaps between every pair of unjoined Arabic letters

              Some font designs allow for the use of the tatweel character for justification. A UA that performs tatweel-based justification must properly handle the rules for its use. Note that correct insertion of tatweel characters depends on context, including the letter-combinations involved, location within the word, and location of the word within the line.

              7.5.5. Minimum Requirements for auto Justification

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              For auto justification, this specification does not define what all of the justification opportunities are, how they are prioritized, or when and how multiple levels of justification opportunities interact. However, it does require that:

              Further information on text justification can be found in (or submitted to) “Approaches to Full Justification”, which indexes by writing system and language, and is maintained by the W3C Internationalization Working Group. [JUSTIFY]

              7.6. Aligning a block of text within its container: the text-group-align property

              Tests

              This section has basic coverage.

              Missing tests:


              Name: text-group-align
              Value: none | start | end | left | right | center
              Initial: none
              Applies to: block containers
              Inherited: no
              Percentages: N/A
              Computed value: specified keyword
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              This property aligns the contents of the line boxes as a group while maintaining their text alignment.

              Group alignment is performed by finding the line box with the shortest remaining space and adding that amount of space as padding to one or both sides of the line box, reducing the amount of space available for its contents; text alignment is then applied to its contents within the remaining space. All descendant in-flow line boxes within the same block formatting context are considered both when searching for the shortest remaining space and when adding the padding; the contents of descendants that establish independent formatting contexts are skipped.

              Tests

              A variant of this property is inherited, and applies on each block container individually, only affecting the line boxes that are direct children of that block. This is less useful, but probably easier to implement.

              Somehow also moving the floats that originate in the same block container by the same amount would make things line up more nicely, which would be especially valuable in CJK layout. Exactly how that works, and how it interacts with intruding floats from ancestor elements is left as an exercise for the reader.

              Values have the following meanings:

              none
              Text alignment happens normally: group alignment is not performed.
              start
              Inline-level content is group-aligned to the inline start side, by padding the inline end side of each line box.
              Tests
              end
              Inline-level content is group-aligned to the inline end side, by padding the inline start side of each line box.
              Tests
              left
              Inline-level content is group-aligned to the line-left side, by padding the line-right side of each line box.
              Tests
              right
              Inline-level content is group-aligned to the line-right side, by padding the line-left side of each line box.
              Tests
              center
              Inline-level content is group-aligned to the center, by padding both sides of each line box, half the spacing to each side.
              Tests

              8. Spacing

              Tests

              Tests only needed in subsections.


              CSS offers control over regular text spacing via the word-spacing, letter-spacing, and line-padding properties, which specify additional space around word separators between typographic character units, or at the start/end of the line, respectively. It also provides contextual control over spacing via the text-spacing-trim property, which allows for contextual fullwidth vs halfwidth setting of CJK punctuation; and the text-autospace property, which allows automatic insertion of extra space at script changes or around punctuation.

              8.1. Word Spacing: the word-spacing property

              Tests

              This section has limited test coverage.

              Missing tests:


              Name: word-spacing
              Value: normal | <length-percentage>
              Initial: normal
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: relative to computed font-size, i.e. 1em
              Computed value: an absolute length and/or a percentage
              Canonical order: n/a
              Animation type: by computed value type
              Tests

              This property specifies additional spacing between “words”. Values are interpreted as defined below:

              normal
              No additional spacing is applied. Computes to zero.
              Tests
              <length-percentage>
              Specifies extra spacing in addition to the intrinsic inter-word spacing defined by the font.
              Tests

              Note: Percentages inherit intact, and are resolved against the computed font-size of the current element (and thus represent a size relative to the size of the text to which they apply), unlike em units which are resolved against the computed font-size of the element from which they inherit, as an absolute length.

              Tests

              Additional spacing is applied to each word separator left in the text after the white space processing rules have been applied, and should be applied half on each side of the character unless otherwise dictated by typographic tradition. Values may be negative, but there may be implementation-dependent limits.

              Tests

              Word-separator characters are typographic character units whose primary purpose and general usage is to separate words. In Unicode this includes (but is not exhaustively defined as) the space (U+0020), the no-break space (U+00A0), the Ethiopic word space (U+1361), the Aegean word separators (U+10100,U+10101), the Ugaritic word divider (U+1039F), and the Phoenician word separator (U+1091F). [UNICODE]

              Tests

              Note: Neither punctuation in general, nor fixed-width spaces (such as U+3000 and U+2000 through U+200A), are considered word-separator characters, because even though they frequently happen to separate words, their primary purpose is not to separate words.

              Tests

              If there are no word-separator characters, or if a word-separating character has a zero advance width (such as U+200B ZERO WIDTH SPACE) then the user agent must not create an additional spacing between words.

              Tests

              8.2. Tracking: the letter-spacing property

              Tests

              This section has partial test coverage.

              Missing tests:


              Name: letter-spacing
              Value: normal | <length-percentage>
              Initial: normal
              Applies to: inline boxes and text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: relative to computed font-size, i.e. 1em
              Computed value: an absolute length and/or a percentage
              Canonical order: n/a
              Animation type: by computed value type
              Tests

              This property specifies additional spacing (commonly called tracking) between adjacent typographic character units. Letter-spacing is applied after bidi reordering and is in addition to kerning and word-spacing. [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4] [CSS-FONTS-3] Depending on the justification rules in effect, user agents may further increase or decrease the space between typographic character units in order to justify text.

              Tests

              Values have the following meanings:

              normal
              No additional spacing is applied. Computes to zero.
              Tests
              <length>
              Specifies additional spacing between typographic character units. Values may be negative, but there may be implementation-dependent limits.
              Tests

              Note: Percentages inherit intact, and are resolved against the computed font-size of the current element (and thus represent a size relative to the size of the text to which they apply), unlike em units which are resolved against the computed font-size of the element from which they inherit, as an absolute length.

              Tests

              For legacy reasons, a computed letter-spacing of zero yields a resolved value (getComputedStyle() return value) of normal.

              For the purpose of letter-spacing, each consecutive run of atomic inlines (such as images and inline blocks) is treated as a single typographic character unit.

              Tests

              Letter-spacing must not be applied at the beginning of a line. Whether letter-spacing is applied at the end of a line is undefined in this level.

              Tests
              When letter-spacing is not applied at the beginning or end of a line, text always fits flush with the edge of the block.
              p { letter-spacing: 1em; }
              
              <p>abc</p>
              

              a b c

              a b c

              UAs therefore really should not [RFC6919] append letter spacing to the right or trailing edge of a line:

              a b c 

              Letter spacing between two typographic character units effectively “belongs” to the innermost element that contains the two typographic character units: the total letter spacing between two adjacent typographic character units (after bidi reordering) is specified by and rendered within the innermost element that contains the boundary between the two typographic character units. However, the UA may instead attach letter-spacing at element boundaries to one or the other typographic character unit using the letter-spacing value pertaining to its containing element.

              Note: This secondary behavior is permitted in this level due to Web-compat concerns.

              Tests
              An inline box is expected to only include letter spacing between characters completely contained within that element, thus excluding letter spacing on the right or trailing edge of the element:
              p { letter-spacing: 1em; }
              <p>a<span>bb</span>c</p>

              a b b c

              a b b c

              Consequently a given value of letter-spacing is expected to only affect the spacing between characters completely contained within the element for which it is specified:

              p    { letter-spacing: 1em; }
              span { letter-spacing: 2em; }
              
              <p>a<span>bb</span>c</p>

              a b  b c

              This further implies that applying letter-spacing to an element containing only a single character has no effect on the rendered result:

              p    { letter-spacing: 1em; }
              span { letter-spacing: 2em; }
              
              <p>a<span>b</span>c</p>

              a b c

              Since letter spacing is inserted after RTL reordering, the letter spacing applied to the inner span below likewise has no effect, since after reordering the "c" doesn’t end up next to "א":

              p    { letter-spacing: 1em; }
              span { letter-spacing: 2em; }
              
              <!-- abc followed by Hebrew letters alef (א), bet (ב) and gimel (ג) -->
              <!-- Reordering will display these in reverse order. -->
              <p>ab<span></span>בג</p>
              

              a b c א ב ג

              Letter spacing ignores invisible zero-width formatting characters (such as those from the Unicode Cf category). Spacing must be added as if those characters did not exist in the document.

              Tests
              For example, letter-spacing applied to A&#x200B;B is identical to AB, regardless of where any element boundaries might fall.

              When the effective spacing between two characters is not zero (due to either justification or a non-zero value of letter-spacing), user agents should not apply optional ligatures, i.e. those that are not defined as required for fundamentally correct glyph shaping. However, ligatures and other font features specified via the low-level font-feature-settings property take precedence over this rule. See CSS Fonts Module Level 3 § feature-precedence.

              Tests
              For example, if the word “filial” is letter-spaced, an “fi” ligature should not be used as it will prevent even spacing of the text.
              filial vs filial

              Note: In OpenType, required ligatures are expected to be associated to the rlig feature. All other ligatures are therefore considered optional. In some cases, however, UA or platform heuristics apply additional ligatures in order to handle broken fonts; this specification does not define or override such exceptional handling.

              8.2.1. Cursive Scripts

              Tests

              This section lacks tests. Not sure automated tests are possible.


              If it is able, the UA may apply letter spacing to cursive scripts by translating the total extra space to be distributed to a run of such letters into some form of cursive elongation (or compression, for negative tracking values) for that run that results in an equivalent total expansion (or compression) of the run. Otherwise, if the UA cannot expand text from a cursive script without breaking its cursive connections, it must not apply spacing between any pair of that script’s typographic letter units at all (effectively treating each word as a single typographic letter unit for the purpose of letter-spacing). Both cases will result in an effective spacing of zero between such letters; however the former will preserve the sense of stretching out the text.

              Below are some appropriate and inappropriate examples of spacing out Arabic text.
              Original text
              BAD Even distribution of space between each letter. Notice this breaks cursive joins!
              OK Distributing ∑letter-spacing by typographically-appropriate cursive elongation. The resulting text is as long as the previous evenly-spaced example.
              OK Suppressing letter-spacing between Arabic letters. Notice letter-spacing is nonetheless applied to non-Arabic characters (like spaces).
              BAD Applying letter-spacing only between non-joined letters. This distorts typographic color and obfuscates word boundaries.

              Note: Proper cursive elongation or compression of a text can vary depending on the script, typeface, language, location within a word, location within a line, implementation complexity, font capabilities, and calligraphic preferences, and may not be possible in certain cases at all. It may involve the use of shortening ligatures, swash variants, contextual forms, elongation glyphs such as U+0640 ـ ARABIC TATWEEL, or other microtypography. It is outside the scope of CSS to define rules for these effects. Authors should avoid applying letter-spacing to cursive scripts unless they are prepared to accept non-interoperable results.

              8.3. Line Start/End Padding: the line-padding property

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              Name: line-padding
              Value: <length>
              Initial: 0
              Applies to: inline boxes
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: N/A
              Computed value: absolute length
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: by computed value type

              Whereas letter-spacing adjusts spacing between typographic letter units and does not apply at the start or end of a line, this property adjusts spacing only at the start/end of a line. The extra spacing is applied only by the innermost inline box at the start/end of the line box, and is inserted between that inline box’s content edge and the adjacent inline-level content (text or atomic inline). This extra space is not a justification opportunity.

              Given the following HTML and CSS:
              p    { line-padding: 0.5em; line-height: 1; text-align: center }
              span { background: black; color: white; }
              em   { background: green; color: white; }
              
              <p><span>Here is <em>some text</em></span>
              

              Line-padding will be inserted such that an extra 0.5em of inline background will be visible on each side of each line. If it renders such that there is a break between “some” and “text”, the additional padding will be: on the first line, black on the left and green on the right, and on the second line, green on both sides.

              Here is some
              text
              

              8.4. Automatic Contextual Spacing: the text-autospace property

              Tests

              This section mostly lacks tests.


              Name: text-autospace
              Value: normal | <autospace> | auto
              Initial: normal
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: N/A
              Computed value: specified keyword(s)
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              Controls spacing between adjacent characters on the same line within the same inline formatting context using a set of character-class-based rules, allowing for automatic control over inter-script spacing and for spacing around punctuation.

              Values are defined as follows:

              <autospace> = no-autospace |
                            [ ideograph-alpha || ideograph-numeric || punctuation ]
                            || [ insert | replace ]
              
              normal
              Same behavior as ideograph-alpha ideograph-numeric.
              no-autospace
              No automatic space is inserted.
              insert
              The specified spacing is automatically inserted if there are no space characters of any kind (Unicode general category Z) already there.

              If neither insert nor replace are specified, the behavior is the same as insert.

              replace
              The specified spacing is automatically inserted even if there is already a space (U+0020) at that point; additionally, the space (U+0020) is removed. Other types of space characters (Unicode general category Z) suppress automatic spacing, as for insert.

              Note: This is for correcting text which is using the easy-to-type U+0020 instead of proper spacing.

              ideograph-alpha
              Creates extra spacing between runs of ideographs and non-ideographic letters, see § 8.4.1 Inter-script Spacing.
              ideograph-numeric
              Creates extra spacing between runs of ideographs and non-ideographic numerals, see § 8.4.1 Inter-script Spacing.
              punctuation
              Creates extra non-breaking spacing around punctuation as required by language-specific typographic conventions.

              In this level, if the element’s content language is French, narrow no-break space (U+202F) and no-break space (U+00A0) is inserted where required by French typographic guidelines. Otherwise this value has no effect. However future specifications may add automatic spacing behavior for other languages.

              auto
              The user agent chooses a set of typographically high quality spacing values. Different user agents running on different platforms may pick different values.

              Note: These spacing values may or may not match OS platform conventions.

              This property is additive with the word-spacing and letter-spacing properties. That is, the amount of spacing contributed by the letter-spacing setting (if any) is added to the spacing created by text-autospace. The same applies to word-spacing.

              At element boundaries, the amount of extra spacing introduced between characters is determined by and rendered within the innermost element that contains the boundary.

              8.4.1. Inter-script Spacing

              Tests

              This section does not need direct tests: the definition given here is exercised by ''text-autospace: ideograph-alpha'' and ''text-autospace: ideograph-numeric''.


              The ideograph-alpha and ideograph-numeric values introduce spacing at the boundary between particular classes of characters when they are directly adjoining on a line, i.e. without any intervening non-zero margin, border, or padding or intervening characters (such as a quotation mark or a space). The amount of space introduced by these keywords is 1/8 of the CJK advance measure, i.e 0.125ic.

              Note: Spacing conventions vary, but values typically range from 1/4ic to as low as 1/8ic, with 1/4ic being more common in historical contexts due to metal type limitations and 1/6ic or thinner being more common in proportional typesetting. Because these spaces are inserted by default (through the initial value, normal), CSS uses 1/8ic in order to be conservative in its interference. A future level of this module may introduce control over the amount of spacing.

              8.5. CJK Punctuation Spacing: the text-spacing-trim property

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              Name: text-spacing-trim
              Value: <spacing-trim> | auto
              Initial: space-first
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: N/A
              Computed value: specified keyword(s)
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              Controls spacing around CJK punctuation characters on the same line within the same inline formatting context using a set of character-class-based rules, allowing them to be set halfwidth or fullwidth based on their position and neighbors within the line.

              Values are defined as follows:

              <spacing-trim> = space-all |  trim-auto | [ allow-end || space-first ]
              
              space-all
              All fullwidth punctuation characters are set with full-width glyphs (spaced).
              trim-auto
              Set fullwidth opening punctuation with half-width glyphs (flush) at the start of each line; set fullwidth closing punctuation with half-width glyphs (flush) at the end of each line; and collapse spacing between punctuation glyphs as described below.
              space-first
              Set fullwidth opening punctuation with full-width glyphs (spaced) on the first line the block container. Otherwise as trim-auto (unless allow-end is also specified).
              This value exists for compat requirements.

              This value exists to manage formatting of existing Chinese and Japanese content, for which trim-auto would have been appropriate typographically, except that they are already written to expect the first line to be set as for space-all.

              Specifically, due to the lack of reliable hanging-punctuation support across UAs, existing content (especially ePub content) uses U+3000 ideographic space in place of text-indent, but omits it when the paragraph begins with punctuation that is desired to hang in the indent in order to create the hanging punctuation effect. Using trim-auto on the first line would thus trim away the effective indent in such content and thus obscure that line’s distinction as the first line of a new paragraph.

              Note that this typesetting practice of using ideographic spaces for indentation (sometimes and not always) is contrary to the separation of content and style offered by HTML and CSS. Using hanging-punctuation and text-indent to control paragraph formatting rather than tweaking the text content of the document preserves the text’s true semantics in the document source and allows the style sheet designer to freely switch among the various spacing/indentation styles without needing to alter the content. See § 8.5.3 Japanese Paragraph-start Conventions in CSS for examples.

              allow-end
              Set fullwidth closing punctuation with half-width glyphs (flush) at the end of each line if it does not otherwise fit prior to justification, else set the punctuation with full-width glyphs. Otherwise as trim-auto (unless space-first is also specified).
              auto
              The user agent chooses a set of typographically high quality spacing values. Different user agents running on different platforms may pick different values.

              Note: These spacing values may or may not match OS platform conventions.

              Do we need auto? It would be weird for the author to choose platform-dependent behavior at the start of the first line, and it should otherwise use trim-auto.

              8.5.1. Fullwidth Punctuation Collapsing

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              Typically, fullwidth characters have glyphs with the same advance width as a standard Han character (e.g. 水 U+6C34). However, many fullwidth punctuation glyphs only take up part of the fullwidth design space. Thus such punctuation are not always set fullwidth. Several values of text-spacing-trim allow the author to control when such characters are set half-width (typically half the width of an ideograph) and when they are set full-width.

              In order to set the text as specified, the UA will need to either

              The UA may use the OpenType halt and vhal features if implemented by a font in order to perform the requisite trimming of a particular glyph. The UA must not use the hwid feature or otherwise substitute halfwidth forms as switching to halfwidth glyphs can change the glyph shape which is not acceptable here.

              Some fonts use proportional glyphs for fullwidth punctuation characters. If there is no support in the font for distinguishing fullwidth vs halfwidth glyph shapes (e.g. through font features), then for such proportional glyphs, the given advance width is considered simultaneously full-width and half-width: the UA must not add or remove space to these glyphs.

              Note: The advance width of a standard Han character can be determined either from font metrics such as the OpenType ideo and idtp baselines for the opposite writing mode, or by taking the advance width of a Han character such as 水 U+6C34. (The opposite writing mode must be used because some fonts are compressed so that the characters are not square.) More information on OpenType metrics can be found in the OpenType spec. Note that if 水 U+6C34, 卜 U+535C, and 一 U+4E00 do not all have the same advance width, the font has proportional ideographs and the fullwidth advance width cannot be reliably determined by measuring glyphs.

              Unless text-spacing-trim is set to space-all (or the font has proportional fullwidth punctuation glyphs), the UA must collapse the space typically associated with such full width glyphs when placed adjacently on a line as follows:

              The following example table lists the punctuation pairs affected by adjacent-pairs trimming. It uses halfwidth equivalents to approximate the trimming effect.
              Demonstration of adjacent-pairs punctuation trimming
              Combination Sample Pair Looks Like
              Opening—Opening + (
              Middle Dot—Opening + (
              Closing—Opening + (
              Ideographic Space—Opening  +  (
              Closing—Closing + )
              Closing—Middle Dot + )
              Closing—Ideographic Space +  ) 

              8.5.2. Text Spacing Character Classes

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              In the context of this property the following definitions apply:

              Classes and Unicode code points need to be reviewed.

              ideographs
              Includes all typographic character units [CSS-TEXT-3] whose base character is listed below:
              • All characters in the range of U+3041 to U+30FF, except those that belong to Unicode Punctuation [P*] general category.
              • CJK Strokes (U+31C0 to U+31EF).
              • Katakana Phonetic Extensions (U+31F0 to U+31FF).
              • All characters that have the Han script property.
              non-ideographic letters
              Includes all typographic character units that belong to Unicode Letters [L*] and Mark [M*] general category, except when any of the following conditions are met:
              non-ideographic numerals
              Includes all typographic character units that belong to the Unicode Decimal Digit Number [Nd] general category, except when any of the following conditions are met:
              fullwidth opening punctuation
              Includes any opening punctuation character (Unicode category Ps) that belongs to the CJK Symbols and Punctuation block (U+3000–U+303F) or is categorized as East Asian Fullwidth (F) by [UAX11]. Also includes LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK (U+2018) and LEFT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK (U+201C). When trimmed, the left (for horizontal text) or top (for vertical text) half is kerned.
              fullwidth closing punctuation
              Includes any closing punctuation character (Unicode category Pe) that belongs to the CJK Symbols and Punctuation block (U+3000–U+303F) or is categorized as East Asian Fullwidth (F) by [UAX11]. Also includes RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK (U+2019) and RIGHT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK (U+201D). May also include fullwidth colon punctuation and/or fullwidth dot punctuation (see below). When trimmed, the right (for horizontal text) or bottom (for vertical text) half is kerned.
              fullwidth middle dot punctuation
              Includes MIDDLE DOT (U+00B7), HYPHENATION POINT (U+2027), and KATAKANA MIDDLE DOT (U+30FB). May also include fullwidth colon punctuation and/or fullwidth dot punctuation (see below).
              fullwidth colon punctuation
              Includes FULLWIDTH COLON (U+FF1A) and FULLWIDTH SEMICOLON (U+FF1B).
              fullwidth dot punctuation
              Includes IDEOGRAPHIC COMMA (U+3001), IDEOGRAPHIC FULL STOP (U+3002), FULLWIDTH COMMA (U+FF0C), FULLWIDTH FULL STOP (U+FF0E).

              Whether fullwidth colon punctuation and fullwidth dot punctuation should be considered fullwidth closing punctuation or fullwidth middle dot punctuation depends on where in the glyph’s box the punctuation is drawn. If the punctuation is centered, then it should be considered middle dot punctuation. If the punctuation is drawn to one side (left in horizontal text, top in vertical text) and the other half is therefore blank then the punctuation should be considered closing punctuation and trimmed accordingly.

              The UA must classify fullwidth colon punctuation and fullwidth dot punctuation under either the fullwidth closing punctuation category or the fullwidth middle dot punctuation category as appropriate. The UA may rely on language conventions and the writing mode (horizontal vs. vertical), and/or font information to determine this categorization. The UA may also add additional characters to any category as appropriate.

              The following informative table summarizes language conventions for classifying fullwidth colon and dot punctuation:
              colon punctuation dot punctuation
              Simplified Chinese (horizontal) closing closing
              Simplified Chinese (vertical) closing closing
              Traditional Chinese middle dot middle dot
              Korean middle dot closing
              Japanese middle dot closing

              Note that for Chinese fonts at least, the author observes that the standard convention is often not followed.

              8.5.3. Japanese Paragraph-start Conventions in CSS

              Tests

              This section is an example, and doesn’t need tests.


              Japanese has three common start-edge typesetting schemes, which are distinguished by their handling of opening brackets.
              The first scheme aligns opening brackets flush with the indent edge
			          on the first line and with the start edge of other lines.
			          The second scheme gives the opening bracket its full width,
			          so that it is effectively indented half an em from the indent edge
			          and from the start edge of other lines.
			          The third scheme aligns the opening brackets flush with the
			          start edge of lines, but hangs them inside the indent on the
			          first line (resulting in an effective half-em indent instead
			          of the full em for paragraphs that begin with an opening bracket).

              Positioning of opening brackets at line head [JLREQ]

              Assuming a UA style sheet of p { margin: 1em 0; }, CSS can achieve the Japanese typesetting styles with the following rules:

              8.6. Character Class Spacing Shorthand: the text-spacing property

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              Name: text-spacing
              Value: normal | none | auto | <autospace> || <spacing-trim>
              Initial: see individual properties
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: N/A
              Computed value: specified keyword(s)
              Animation type: discrete
              Canonical order: per grammar

              This property is a shorthand for setting text-spacing-trim and text-autospace in a single declaration. Values are defined as follows:

              normal
              Specifies the baseline behavior, setting each sub-property to its initial value. Equivalent to space-first ideograph-alpha ideograph-numeric.
              none
              Turns off all text-spacing features: sets text-spacing-trim to space-all and text-autospace to no-autospace.
              auto
              Sets both text-spacing-trim and text-autospace to auto.
              <spacing-trim>
              Sets text-spacing-trim to the specified value. If no <autospace> value is given, text-autospace is set to its initial value.
              <autospace>
              Sets text-autospace to the specified value. If no <spacing-trim> value is given, text-spacing-trim is set to its initial value.

              8.7. Shaping Across Element Boundaries

              Tests

              This section has good test coverage.


              Text shaping must be broken at inline box boundaries when any of the following are true for any box whose boundary separates the two typographic character units:

              Text shaping must not be broken across inline box boundaries when there is no effective change in formatting, or if the only formatting changes do not affect the glyphs (as in applying text decoration).

              Tests

              Text shaping should not be broken across inline box boundaries otherwise, if it is reasonable and possible for that case given the limitations of the font technology.

              Tests
              An example of reasonable and possible shaping across boundaries is Arabic shaping: in many systems this is performed by the font engine, allowing the font to provide variant glyphs with potentially very sophisticated contextual shaping. It’s not generally possible to rely on this system across a font change unless the font engine has an API to provide context, but it is straightforward and therefore quite reasonable for an engine to work around this limitation by, for example, using the zero-width-joiner (U+200D) or zero-width-non-joiner (U+200C) as appropriate to solicit the correct choice of initial/medial/final/isolated glyph.

              An example of possible but not reasonable shaping across boundaries is handling a font that is sensitive to 20 characters of context on either side to choose its glyphs: passing all the text before and after the string in question, even through multiple inline boundaries with formatting changes, is complicated. The UA could handle such cases, but is not required to, as they are not typical or fundamentally required by any modern writing system.

              An example of impossible shaping across boundaries is a change in font weight partway through the word “and” in a font where a ligature would replace all three letters of the word “and” with an ampersand glyph (“&”).

              9. Edge Effects

              Tests

              Tests only needed in subsections.


              Edge effects control the indentation of lines with respect to other lines in the block (text-indent) and how content is measured at the start and end edges of a line (hanging-punctuation).

              9.1. First Line Indentation: the text-indent property

              Tests

              This section has adequate test coverage.


              Name: text-indent
              Value: [ <length-percentage> ] && hanging? && each-line?
              Initial: 0
              Applies to: block containers
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: refers to block container’s own inline-axis inner size
              Computed value: computed <length-percentage> value, plus any specified keywords
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: by computed value type
              Tests

              This property specifies the indentation applied to lines of inline content in a block. The indent is treated as a margin applied to the start edge of the line box.

              Tests

              Unless otherwise specified by the each-line and/or hanging keywords, only lines that are the first formatted line of an element are affected. [CSS-PSEUDO-4] For example, the first line of an anonymous block box is only affected if it is the first child of its parent element.

              Tests

              Values have the following meanings:

              <length>
              Gives the amount of the indent as an absolute length.
              Tests
              <percentage>
              Gives the amount of the indent as a percentage of the block container’s own logical width.
              Tests

              Percentages must be treated as 0 for the purpose of calculating intrinsic size contributions, but are always resolved normally when performing layout.

              Tests

              Note: This can lead to the element overflowing. It is not recommended to use percentage indents and intrinsic sizing together.

              each-line
              Indentation affects the first line of each block container and each line after a forced line break (but not lines after a soft wrap break).
              Tests
              hanging
              Inverts which lines are affected.
              Tests

              If text-align is start and text-indent is 5em in left-to-right text with no floats present, then first line of text will start 5em into the block:

                   Since CSS1 it has been possible to
              indent the first line of a block element
              5em by setting the 'text-indent' property 
              to '5em'.
              

              If we add the hanging keyword, then the first line will start flush, but other lines will be indented 5em:

              In CSS3 we can instead indent all other
                   lines of the block element by 5em
                   by setting the 'text-indent' property
                   to 'hanging 5em'.
              
              Since the text-indent property only affects the “first formatted line”, a line after a forced break will not be indented.
                 For example, in the middle of
              this paragraph is an equation,
              which is centered:
                           x + y = z
              The first line after the equation
              is flush (else it would look like
              we started a new paragraph).
              

              However, sometimes (as in poetry or code), it is appropriate to indent each line that happens to be long enough to wrap. In the following example, text-indent is given a value of 3em hanging each-line, giving the third line of the poem a hanging indent where it soft-wraps at the block’s right boundary:

              In a short line of text
              There need be no wrapping,
              But when we go on and on and on  
                 and on,
              Sometimes a soft break
              Can help us stay on the page.
              

              Note: Since the text-indent property inherits, when specified on a block element, it will affect descendant inline-block elements. For this reason, it is often wise to specify text-indent: 0 on elements that are specified display: inline-block.

              9.2. Hanging Glyphs

              Tests

              Test coverage TBD. Partly tested through § 9.2.1 Hanging Punctuation: the hanging-punctuation property partly through § 4.3.2 Phase II: Trimming and Positioning.


              When a glyph at the start or end edge of a line hangs, it is not considered when measuring the line’s contents for fit, alignment, or justification. Depending on the line’s alignment/justification, this can result in the mark being placed outside the line box. The hanging glyph is also not taken into account when computing intrinsic sizes (min-content size and max-content size), and any sizes derived thereof. (The interaction of this measurement and kerning is currently UA-defined; the CSSWG welcomes advice on this point.)

              Tests

              A hanging glyph is still enclosed inside its parent inline box and still participates in text justification: its character advance is just not measured when determining how much content fits on the line, how much the line’s contents need to be expanded or compressed for justification, or how to position the content within the line box for text alignment. Effectively, the hanging glyph character advance is re-interpreted as an additional negative margin on the affected edge of its parent inline box; the line is otherwise laid out as usual. An overflowing hanging glyph should typically be considered ink overflow so as to avoid creating unnecessary scrollbars, but the UA may treat it as scrollable overflow when the content is editable or in other circumstances where treating it as scrollable overflow would be useful to the user. [CSS-OVERFLOW-3]

              Tests

              In some cases, a glyph at the end of a line can conditionally hang: it hangs only if it does not otherwise fit in the line prior to justification. It is not considered when measuring the line’s contents for fit; however, any part of it that does not fit is considered to hang. Glyphs that conditionally hang are not taken into account when computing min-content sizes and any sizes derived thereof, but they are taken into account for max-content sizes and any sizes derived thereof.

              Tests

              Non-zero inline-axis borders or padding between a hangable glyph and the edge of the line prevent the glyph from hanging. For example, a period at the end of an inline box with end padding does not hang at the end edge of a line.

              Multiple adjacent glyphs can hang together, however specific limits on how many are allowed to hang may be specified (e.g. at most one punctuation character may hang at each edge of the line).

              9.2.1. Hanging Punctuation: the hanging-punctuation property

              Tests

              This section has spotty test coverage. All values have tests.

              Missing tests:


              Name: hanging-punctuation
              Value: none | [ first || [ force-end | allow-end ] || last ]
              Initial: none
              Applies to: text
              Inherited: yes
              Percentages: n/a
              Computed value: specified keyword(s)
              Canonical order: per grammar
              Animation type: discrete
              Tests

              This property determines whether a punctuation mark, if one is present, hangs and may be placed outside the line box (or in the indent) at the start or at the end of a line of text.

              Note: If there is not sufficient padding on the block container, hanging-punctuation can trigger overflow.

              Values have the following meanings:

              none
              No punctuation character is made to hang.
              first
              An opening bracket, quote, or ideographic space at the start of the first formatted line of an element hangs. This applies to all characters in the Unicode categories Ps, Pf, Pi plus the ASCII quote marks U+0027 ' APOSTROPHE and U+0022 " QUOTATION MARK and the IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE U+3000.
              Tests
              last
              A closing bracket or quote at the end of the last formatted line of an element hangs. This applies to all characters in the Unicode categories Pe, Pf, Pi plus the ASCII quote marks U+0027 ' APOSTROPHE and U+0022 " QUOTATION MARK.
              Tests
              force-end
              A stop or comma at the end of a line hangs.
              Tests
              allow-end
              A stop or comma at the end of a line conditionally hangs.
              Tests

              At most one punctuation character may hang at each edge of the line.

              Stops and commas allowed to hang include:

              U+002C , COMMA
              U+002E . FULL STOP
              U+060C ، ARABIC COMMA
              U+06D4 ۔ ARABIC FULL STOP
              U+3001 IDEOGRAPHIC COMMA
              U+3002 IDEOGRAPHIC FULL STOP
              U+FF0C FULLWIDTH COMMA
              U+FF0E FULLWIDTH FULL STOP
              U+FE50 SMALL COMMA
              U+FE51 SMALL IDEOGRAPHIC COMMA
              U+FE52 SMALL FULL STOP
              U+FF61 HALFWIDTH IDEOGRAPHIC FULL STOP
              U+FF64 HALFWIDTH IDEOGRAPHIC COMMA

              The UA may include other characters as appropriate.

              Note: The CSS Working Group would appreciate if UAs including other characters would inform the working group of such additions.

              The allow-end and force-end are two variations of hanging punctuation used in East Asia.
              hanging-punctuation: allow-end
              p {
                text-align: justify;
                hanging-punctuation: allow-end;
              }
              
              hanging-punctuation: force-end
              p {
                text-align: justify;
                hanging-punctuation: force-end;
              }
              

              The punctuation at the end of the first line for allow-end does not hang, because it fits without hanging. However, if force-end is used, it is forced to hang. The justification measures the line without the hanging punctuation. Therefore when the line is expanded, the punctuation is pushed outside the line.

              9.3. Bidirectionality and Line Boxes

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              The start and end sides of a line box are determined by the inline base direction of the line box. Although they usually match, the inline base direction of a line box is distinct from the inline base direction of the containing block or the bidi paragraph. The line box’s inline base direction affects text-align-all, text-align-last, text-indent, and hanging-punctuationi.e. the position and alignment of its contents with respect to its edges. It does not affect the formatting or ordering of inline content (which is controlled by the Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm as applied by CSS Writing Modes [UAX9] [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4]).

              In most cases, a line box’s inline base direction is given by its containing block’s computed direction. However, if its containing block has unicode-bidi: plaintext [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4]:

              In the following example, assuming the <block> is a start-aligned preformatted block (display: block; white-space: pre; text-align: start), every other line is right-aligned:
              <block style="unicode-bidi: plaintext">
              français
              فارسی
              français
              فارسی
              français
              فارسی
              </block>
              
              Because neutral characters (such as punctuation) and isolated runs are skipped when finding the inline base direction of a plaintext bidi paragraph, the line box in the following example will be left-to-right (and thus left-aligned given text-align: start), as dictated by the first strong character, ‘h’:
              <para style="display: block; direction: rtl; unicode-bidi:plaintext"><quote style="unicode-bidi:plaintext">שלום!</quote>”, they said.
              </para>
              
              <textarea style="direction: rtl; unicode-bidi:plaintext">
              
              Hello!
              
              </textarea>
              

              Because of unicode-bidi: plaintext, the “Hello!” is typeset LTR (i.e. with the exclamation mark on the right side) and left-aligned, ignoring the containing block’s RTL direction. This makes the empty line following it LTR as well, which means that a caret on that line should appear at its left edge. The empty first line, however, is right-aligned: having no preceding line, it assumes the RTL direction of its containing block.

              Appendix A: Text Processing Order of Operations

              Tests

              Tests probably not needed for this section, as it is exercised through the rest of the specification.


              This appendix is normative.

              The following list defines the order of text operations. (Implementations are not bound to this order as long as the resulting layout is the same.)

              1. § 4.2 White Space Trimming: the white-space-trim property
              2. white space processing part I (pre-wrapping)
              3. § 2.2 Expanding Between Words: the word-space-transform property and text transformation
                Tests
              4. text combination [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4]
              5. text orientation [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4]
              6. text wrapping while applying per line:
              7. justification (which may affect glyph selection and/or text wrapping, looping back into that step)
              8. text alignment
              9. text group alignment
              Tests

              Appendix B: Conversion to Plaintext

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              This appendix is normative for the purpose of plaintext copy-paste operations.

              When a CSS-rendered document is converted to a plaintext format, it is expected that:

              Appendix C: Default UA Stylesheet

              Tests

              Tests not needed for this section.


              This appendix is informative, and is to help UA developers to implement a default stylesheet for HTML, but UA developers are free to ignore or modify as appropriate.

              /* make option elements align together */
              option { text-align: match-parent; }
              
              /* do not allow white space to collapse in textarea */
              textarea { white-space-collapse: preserve !important; }
              
              /* preserve character grid in preformatted text */
              pre, code, kbd, samp, tt { text-spacing: none; }
              

              Appendix D: Scripts and Spacing

              Tests

              Tests not needed for this section: these are definitions, they get tested through their application, not by themselves.


              This appendix is normative.

              Typographic behavior varies somewhat by language, but varies drastically by writing system. This appendix categorizes some common scripts in Unicode 6.0 according to their justification and spacing behavior. Category descriptions are descriptive, not prescriptive; the determining factor is the prioritization of justification opportunities.

              block scripts
              CJK and by extension all Wide characters (see East Asian Width [UAX11]). The following Unicode scripts are included: Bopomofo, Han, Hangul, Hiragana, Katakana, and Yi. Characters of the East Asian Width property Wide and Fullwidth are also included, but Ambiguous characters are included only if the writing system is Chinese, Korean, or Japanese.
              clustered scripts
              Clustered scripts have discrete units and break only at word boundaries, but do not use visible word separators. They prioritize stretching spaces, but comfortably admit inter-character spacing for justification. The clustered scripts include, but are not limited to, the following Unicode scripts: Khmer, Lao, Myanmar, New Tai Lue, Tai Le, Tai Tham, Tai Viet, Thai
              cursive scripts
              Cursive scripts do not admit gaps between their letters for either justification or letter-spacing. The following Unicode scripts are included: Arabic, Mandaic, Mongolian, N’Ko, Phags Pa, Syriac

              Note: Indic scripts with baseline connectors (such as Devanagari and Gujarati) are not considered cursive scripts, and do admit such gaps between typographic character units. See Indic Layout Requirements. [ILREQ]

              User agents should update this list as they update their Unicode support to handle as-yet-unencoded cursive scripts in future versions of Unicode, and are encouraged to ask the CSSWG to update this spec accordingly.

              Appendix E: Characters and Properties

              Tests

              This section lacks tests.


              This appendix is normative.

              Unicode defines four code point-level properties that are referenced in CSS typesetting:

              East Asian width property
              Defined in Unicode Standard Annex #11 [UAX11] and given as the East_Asian_Width property in the Unicode Character Database [UAX44].
              general category
              Defined in Unicode Standard Annex #44 [UAX44] and given as the General_Category property in the Unicode Character Database [UAX44].
              script property
              Defined in Unicode Standard Annex #24 [UAX24] and given as the Script property in the Unicode Character Database [UAX44]. (UAs must include any ScriptExtensions.txt assignments in this mapping.)
              Vertical Orientation
              Defined in Unicode Standard Annex #50 [UAX50] as the Vertical_Orientation property in the Unicode Character Database [UAX44].

              Unicode defines properties for individual code points, but sometimes it is necessary to determine the properties of a typographic character unit. For the purposes of CSS Text, the properties of a typographic character unit are given by the base character of its first grapheme clusterexcept in two cases:

              Appendix F: Identifying the Content Writing System

              Tests

              This section has partial test coverage. Each of the various properties that take the content language into account is tested, except tested on text-justification:auto, but probably not testable anyway.

              Missing tests:


              This appendix is normative.

              While most languages have a preferred writing system, some have multiple, and most can also be transcribed into one or more foreign writing systems. As a common example, most languages have at least one Latin transcription, and can thus be written in the Latin writing system. Transcribed texts typically adopt the typographic conventions of the writing system: for example Japanese “romaji” and Chinese Pinyin use Latin letters and word spaces, and follow Latin line-breaking and justification practices accordingly. As another example, historical ideographic Korean (ko-Hani) does not use word spaces, and should therefore be typeset similar to Chinese rather than modern Korean.

              In HTML or any other document language using BCP47 tags for identifying languages to declare the content language, authors can disambiguate or indicate the use of an atypical writing system with script subtags. [BCP47] For example, to indicate use of the Latin writing system for languages which don’t natively use it, the -Latn script subtag can be added, e.g. ja-Latn for Japanese romaji. Other subtags exist for other writing systems, see ISO’s Code for the Representation of Names of Scripts and the ISO15924 script tag registry. [ISO15924]

              Some common/historical examples of using BCP47 tags with script subtags:
              zh-Latn
              Chinese, written in Latin transcription.
              ko-Hani
              Korean, written in Hanja (Chinese ideographic characters).
              tr-Arab
              Turkish, written in Arabic script.
              mn-Cyrl
              Mongolian, written in Cyrillic.
              mn-Mong
              Mongolian, written in traditional Mongolian script.

              However, BCP47 script subtags are not typically used (and are in fact discouraged) for languages strongly associated with a single writing system: instead that writing system is expected to be implied when no other is specified. [BCP47] IANA maintains a database of various languages’ most common writing system via the Suppress-Script field in its language subtag registry for this purpose.

              Note: More advice on language tagging can be found in the Internationalization Working Group’s “Language tags in HTML and XML” and “Choosing a Language Tag”.

              When no writing system is explicitly indicated, UAs should assume the most common writing system of the declared content language for language-sensitive typographic behaviors such as line-breaking or justification. However, UAs must not assume that writing system if the author has explicitly declared a different one. If the UA has no language-specific knowledge of a particular language and writing system combination, it must use the typographic conventions of the declared writing system (assuming the conventions of a different language if necessary), not the conventions of the declared language in an assumed writing system, which would be inappropriate to the declared writing system.

              Tests

              The full correspondence between languages and their most common writing systems is out of scope for this document. However, user agents must assume at least the following:

              Appendix G: Small Kana Mappings

              Tests

              This section has good test coverage, through the text-transform property.


              This appendix is normative.

              Small Kana Map to Full-size Kana
              Small Full-size
              ぁ U+3041 あ U+3042
              ぃ U+3043 い U+3044
              ぅ U+3045 う U+3046
              ぇ U+3047 え U+3048
              ぉ U+3049 お U+304A
              ゕ U+3095 か U+304B
              ゖ U+3096 け U+3051
              𛄲 U+1B132 こ U+3053
              っ U+3063 つ U+3064
              ゃ U+3083 や U+3084
              ゅ U+3085 ゆ U+3086
              ょ U+3087 よ U+3088
              ゎ U+308E わ U+308F
              𛅐 U+1B150 ゐ U+3090
              𛅑 U+1B151 ゑ U+3091
              𛅒 U+1B152 を U+3092
              ァ U+30A1 ア U+30A2
              ィ U+30A3 イ U+30A4
              ゥ U+30A5 ウ U+30A6
              ェ U+30A7 エ U+30A8
              ォ U+30A9 オ U+30AA
              ヵ U+30F5 カ U+30AB
              ㇰ U+31F0 ク U+30AF
              ヶ U+30F6 ケ U+30B1
              𛅕 U+1B155 コ U+30B3
              ㇱ U+31F1 シ U+30B7
              ㇲ U+31F2 ス U+30B9
              ッ U+30C3 ツ U+30C4
              ㇳ U+31F3 ト U+30C8
              ㇴ U+31F4 ヌ U+30CC
              ㇵ U+31F5 ハ U+30CF
              ㇶ U+31F6 ヒ U+30D2
              ㇷ U+31F7 フ U+30D5
              ㇸ U+31F8 ヘ U+30D8
              ㇹ U+31F9 ホ U+30DB
              ㇺ U+31FA ム U+30E0
              ャ U+30E3 ヤ U+30E4
              ュ U+30E5 ユ U+30E6
              ョ U+30E7 ヨ U+30E8
              ㇻ U+31FB ラ U+30E9
              ㇼ U+31FC リ U+30EA
              ㇽ U+31FD ル U+30EB
              ㇾ U+31FE レ U+30EC
              ㇿ U+31FF ロ U+30ED
              ヮ U+30EE ワ U+30EF
              𛅤 U+1B164 ヰ U+30F0
              𛅥 U+1B165 ヱ U+30F1
              𛅦 U+1B166 ヲ U+30F2
              𛅧 U+1B167 ン U+30F3
              ァ U+FF67 ア U+FF71
              ィ U+FF68 イ U+FF72
              ゥ U+FF69 ウ U+FF73
              ェ U+FF6A エ U+FF74
              ォ U+FF6B オ U+FF75
              ッ U+FF6F ツ U+FF82
              ャ U+FF6C ヤ U+FF94
              ュ U+FF6D ユ U+FF95
              ョ U+FF6E ヨ U+FF96
              Tests

              Appendix H: Word and Phrase Detection

              Tests

              This section has partial test coverage.

              Missing tests:

              Likely untestable:


              This appendix is normative.

              A few operations in this specification depend on automated word boundary detection or phrase boundary detection.

              Both operations are similar: the user agent performs linguistic analysis of the text to identify language-specific meaningful sequences of characters. They differ only targetting different units of text: either words or phrases.

              While easily understood in a broad sense, both concepts of word and phrase are difficult to precisely define, especially in a way that works accross multiple languages. Nonetheless, in this context:

              The start and end position of each detected word or phrase is called a word boundary or phrase boundary. By themselves, word and phrase boundaries are not observable, but properties like word-space-transform or word-break can cause visible effects at those positions.

              The specific algorithm to detect word or phrases and to place their boundaries is UA-dependent, and may take into account a variety of factors or approaches, such as dictionary-based lexical analysis, identification of punctuation or other delimiting characters, morphological analysis, machine learning methods…

              The following constraints must nevertheless be respected:

              Security Considerations

              Tests

              Tests not needed for this section.


              This specification introduces no new security considerations.

              Privacy Considerations

              Tests

              Tests not needed for this section.


              This specification leaks the user’s installed hyphenation and line-breaking dictionaries.

              Acknowledgements

              Tests

              Tests not needed for this section.


              This specification would not have been possible without the help from: Addison Phillips, Aharon Lanin, Alan Stearns, Ambrose Li, Arnold Schrijver, Arye Gittelman, Ayman Aldahleh, Ben Errez, Bert Bos, Chris Lilley, Chris Pratley, Chris Thrasher, Chris Wilson, Dave Hyatt, David Baron, Emilio Cobos Álvarez, Eric LeVine, Etan Wexler, Frank Tang, Håkon Wium Lie, IM Mincheol, Ian Hickson, James Clark, Javier Fernandez, John Daggett, Jonathan Kew, Ken Lunde, Laurie Anna Edlund, Marcin Sawicki, Martin Dürst, Martin Heijdra, Masafumi Yabe, Masayasu Ishikawa, Michael Jochimsen, Michel Suignard, Mike Bemford, Myles Maxfield, Nat McCully, Paul Nelson, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux, Rahul Sonnad, Randy Edmunds, Richard Ishida, Shinyu Murakami, Stephen Deach, Steve Zilles, Takao Suzuki, Tantek Çelik, Xidorn Quan, Yaniv Feinberg.

              Changes

              This draft is kept in sync with [CSS-TEXT-3], see CSS Text 3 §  Changes.
              Changes specific to Level 4 are listed below.

              Significant changes since the 29 March 2023 Working Draft include:

              Significant changes since the 1 March 2022 Working Draft include:

              Significant changes since the 31 December 2022 Working Draft include:

              Significant changes since the 5 May 2022 Working Draft include:

              Significant changes since the 2019 Working Draft include:

              Additions Since Level 3

              New features in Level 4:

              Conformance

              Document conventions

              Conformance requirements are expressed with a combination of descriptive assertions and RFC 2119 terminology. The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in the normative parts of this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. However, for readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase letters in this specification.

              All of the text of this specification is normative except sections explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. [RFC2119]

              Examples in this specification are introduced with the words “for example” or are set apart from the normative text with class="example", like this:

              This is an example of an informative example.

              Informative notes begin with the word “Note” and are set apart from the normative text with class="note", like this:

              Note, this is an informative note.

              Advisements are normative sections styled to evoke special attention and are set apart from other normative text with <strong class="advisement">, like this: UAs MUST provide an accessible alternative.

              Tests

              Tests relating to the content of this specification may be documented in “Tests” blocks like this one. Any such block is non-normative.


              Conformance classes

              Conformance to this specification is defined for three conformance classes:

              style sheet
              A CSS style sheet.
              renderer
              A UA that interprets the semantics of a style sheet and renders documents that use them.
              authoring tool
              A UA that writes a style sheet.

              A style sheet is conformant to this specification if all of its statements that use syntax defined in this module are valid according to the generic CSS grammar and the individual grammars of each feature defined in this module.

              A renderer is conformant to this specification if, in addition to interpreting the style sheet as defined by the appropriate specifications, it supports all the features defined by this specification by parsing them correctly and rendering the document accordingly. However, the inability of a UA to correctly render a document due to limitations of the device does not make the UA non-conformant. (For example, a UA is not required to render color on a monochrome monitor.)

              An authoring tool is conformant to this specification if it writes style sheets that are syntactically correct according to the generic CSS grammar and the individual grammars of each feature in this module, and meet all other conformance requirements of style sheets as described in this module.

              Partial implementations

              So that authors can exploit the forward-compatible parsing rules to assign fallback values, CSS renderers must treat as invalid (and ignore as appropriate) any at-rules, properties, property values, keywords, and other syntactic constructs for which they have no usable level of support. In particular, user agents must not selectively ignore unsupported component values and honor supported values in a single multi-value property declaration: if any value is considered invalid (as unsupported values must be), CSS requires that the entire declaration be ignored.

              Implementations of Unstable and Proprietary Features

              To avoid clashes with future stable CSS features, the CSSWG recommends following best practices for the implementation of unstable features and proprietary extensions to CSS.

              Non-experimental implementations

              Once a specification reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage, non-experimental implementations are possible, and implementors should release an unprefixed implementation of any CR-level feature they can demonstrate to be correctly implemented according to spec.

              To establish and maintain the interoperability of CSS across implementations, the CSS Working Group requests that non-experimental CSS renderers submit an implementation report (and, if necessary, the testcases used for that implementation report) to the W3C before releasing an unprefixed implementation of any CSS features. Testcases submitted to W3C are subject to review and correction by the CSS Working Group.

              Further information on submitting testcases and implementation reports can be found from on the CSS Working Group’s website at http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/. Questions should be directed to the public-css-testsuite@w3.org mailing list.

              Index

              Terms defined by this specification

              Terms defined by reference

              References

              Normative References

              [CSS-BACKGROUNDS-3]
              Bert Bos; Elika Etemad; Brad Kemper. CSS Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds/
              [CSS-BOX-4]
              Elika Etemad. CSS Box Model Module Level 4. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-box-4/
              [CSS-BREAK-4]
              Rossen Atanassov; Elika Etemad. CSS Fragmentation Module Level 4. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-break-4/
              [CSS-CASCADE-5]
              Elika Etemad; Miriam Suzanne; Tab Atkins Jr.. CSS Cascading and Inheritance Level 5. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-5/
              [CSS-DISPLAY-4]
              CSS Display Module Level 4. Editor's Draft. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-4/
              [CSS-FONTS-3]
              John Daggett; Myles Maxfield; Chris Lilley. CSS Fonts Module Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-3/
              [CSS-FONTS-4]
              John Daggett; Myles Maxfield; Chris Lilley. CSS Fonts Module Level 4. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/
              [CSS-INLINE-3]
              Dave Cramer; Elika Etemad. CSS Inline Layout Module Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-inline-3/
              [CSS-OVERFLOW-3]
              Elika Etemad; Florian Rivoal. CSS Overflow Module Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-3/
              [CSS-PSEUDO-4]
              Daniel Glazman; Elika Etemad; Alan Stearns. CSS Pseudo-Elements Module Level 4. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-pseudo-4/
              [CSS-RUBY-1]
              Elika Etemad; et al. CSS Ruby Annotation Layout Module Level 1. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ruby-1/
              [CSS-SIZING-3]
              Tab Atkins Jr.; Elika Etemad. CSS Box Sizing Module Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/
              [CSS-TEXT-3]
              Elika Etemad; Koji Ishii; Florian Rivoal. CSS Text Module Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-3/
              [CSS-VALUES-3]
              Tab Atkins Jr.; Elika Etemad. CSS Values and Units Module Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/
              [CSS-VALUES-4]
              Tab Atkins Jr.; Elika Etemad. CSS Values and Units Module Level 4. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/
              [CSS-WRITING-MODES-3]
              Elika Etemad; Koji Ishii. CSS Writing Modes Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-3/
              [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4]
              Elika Etemad; Koji Ishii. CSS Writing Modes Level 4. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-4/
              [CSS2]
              Bert Bos; et al. Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Revision 1 (CSS 2.1) Specification. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/
              [CSS3-BREAK]
              Rossen Atanassov; Elika Etemad. CSS Fragmentation Module Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-break/
              [CSS3-FLEXBOX]
              Tab Atkins Jr.; et al. CSS Flexible Box Layout Module Level 1. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/
              [CSSOM-1]
              Daniel Glazman; Emilio Cobos Álvarez. CSS Object Model (CSSOM). URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/
              [HTML]
              Anne van Kesteren; et al. HTML Standard. Living Standard. URL: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/
              [INFRA]
              Anne van Kesteren; Domenic Denicola. Infra Standard. Living Standard. URL: https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/
              [RFC2119]
              S. Bradner. Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels. March 1997. Best Current Practice. URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119
              [UAX11]
              Ken Lunde 小林劍󠄁. East Asian Width. 16 August 2022. Unicode Standard Annex #11. URL: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr11/tr11-40.html
              [UAX14]
              Christopher Chapman. Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm. 16 August 2022. Unicode Standard Annex #14. URL: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr14/tr14-49.html
              [UAX24]
              Ken Whistler. Unicode Script Property. 25 August 2022. Unicode Standard Annex #24. URL: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr24/tr24-34.html
              [UAX29]
              Christopher Chapman. Unicode Text Segmentation. 26 August 2022. Unicode Standard Annex #29. URL: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-41.html
              [UAX44]
              Ken Whistler. Unicode Character Database. 2 September 2022. Unicode Standard Annex #44. URL: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr44/tr44-30.html
              [UAX50]
              Ken Lunde 小林劍󠄁; Koji Ishii 石井宏治. Unicode Vertical Text Layout. 16 August 2022. Unicode Standard Annex #50. URL: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr50/tr50-28.html
              [UAX9]
              Mark Davis; Ken Whistler. Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm. 16 August 2022. Unicode Standard Annex #9. URL: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/tr9-46.html
              [UNICODE]
              The Unicode Standard. URL: https://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/

              Informative References

              [BCP47]
              A. Phillips, Ed.; M. Davis, Ed.. Tags for Identifying Languages. September 2009. Best Current Practice. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5646
              [CLREQ]
              Bobby Tung; et al. Requirements for Chinese Text Layout - 中文排版需求. URL: https://w3c.github.io/clreq/
              [CSS-DISPLAY-3]
              Elika Etemad; Tab Atkins Jr.. CSS Display Module Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display/
              [CSS-TEXT-DECOR-3]
              Elika Etemad; Koji Ishii. CSS Text Decoration Module Level 3. URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/
              [DOM]
              Anne van Kesteren. DOM Standard. Living Standard. URL: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/
              [ILREQ]
              Swaran Lata. Indic Layout Requirements. URL: https://w3c.github.io/ilreq/
              [ISO15924]
              Code for the representation of names of scripts. International Organization for Standardization. 1998. ISO 15924:1998. Draft International Standard
              [JIS4051]
              Formatting rules for Japanese documents (『日本語文書の組版方法』). Japanese Standards Association. 2004. JIS X 4051:2004. In Japanese
              [JLREQ]
              Hiroyuki Chiba; et al. Requirements for Japanese Text Layout 日本語組版処理の要件(日本語版). URL: https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/
              [JUSTIFY]
              Elika Etemad; Richard Ishida. Approches to Full Justification. URL: https://www.w3.org/International/articles/typography/justification
              [L2-22-080R]
              Norbert Lindenberg; Elika Etemad; Vaishnavi Murthy Yerkadithaya. Line breaking at orthographic syllable boundaries. Proposal. URL: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2022/22080r-line-break-ortho-bnd.pdf
              [RFC6919]
              R. Barnes; S. Kent; E. Rescorla. Further Key Words for Use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels. 1 April 2013. Experimental. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6919
              [TYPOGRAPHY]
              Richard Ishida. Language enablement index. URL: https://w3c.github.io/typography/
              [XML10]
              Tim Bray; et al. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition). 26 November 2008. REC. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/
              [ZHMARK]
              General Rules for Punctuation (《标点符号用法》). 2011. GB/T 15834―2011. In Chinese.

              Property Index

              Name Value Initial Applies to Inh. %ages Anim­ation type Canonical order Com­puted value
              hanging-punctuation none | [ first || [ force-end | allow-end ] || last ] none text yes n/a discrete per grammar specified keyword(s)
              hyphenate-character auto | <string> auto text yes n/a discrete per grammar specified keyword
              hyphenate-limit-chars [ auto | <integer> ]{1,3} auto text yes n/a by computed value type per grammar three values, each either the auto keyword or an integer
              hyphenate-limit-last none | always | column | page | spread none block containers yes n/a discrete per grammar specified keyword
              hyphenate-limit-lines no-limit | <integer> no-limit block containers yes n/a by computed value type per grammar specified keyword or integer
              hyphenate-limit-zone <length-percentage> 0 block containers yes refers to length of the line box by computed value type per grammar computed <length-percentage> value
              hyphens none | manual | auto manual text yes n/a discrete n/a specified keyword
              letter-spacing normal | <length-percentage> normal inline boxes and text yes relative to computed font-size, i.e. 1em by computed value type n/a an absolute length and/or a percentage
              line-break auto | loose | normal | strict | anywhere auto text yes n/a discrete n/a specified keyword
              line-padding <length> 0 inline boxes yes N/A by computed value type per grammar absolute length
              overflow-wrap normal | break-word | anywhere normal text yes n/a discrete n/a specified keyword
              tab-size <number> | <length> 8 text yes n/a by computed value type n/a the specified number or absolute length
              text-align start | end | left | right | center | <string> | justify | match-parent | justify-all start block containers yes see individual properties discrete n/a see individual properties
              text-align-all start | end | left | right | center | justify | match-parent start block containers yes n/a discrete n/a keyword as specified, except for match-parent which computes as defined above
              text-align-last auto | start | end | left | right | center | justify | match-parent auto block containers yes n/a discrete n/a specified keyword
              text-autospace normal | <autospace> | auto normal text yes N/A discrete per grammar specified keyword(s)
              text-group-align none | start | end | left | right | center none block containers no N/A discrete per grammar specified keyword
              text-indent [ <length-percentage> ] && hanging? && each-line? 0 block containers yes refers to block container’s own inline-axis inner size by computed value type per grammar computed <length-percentage> value, plus any specified keywords
              text-justify [ auto | none | inter-word | inter-character | ruby ] || no-compress auto text yes n/a discrete n/a specified keyword (except for the distribute legacy value)
              text-spacing normal | none | auto | <autospace> || <spacing-trim> see individual properties text yes N/A discrete per grammar specified keyword(s)
              text-spacing-trim <spacing-trim> | auto space-first text yes N/A discrete per grammar specified keyword(s)
              text-transform none | [capitalize | uppercase | lowercase ] || full-width || full-size-kana none text yes n/a discrete n/a specified keyword
              text-wrap <text-wrap-mode> || <text-wrap-style> wrap see individual properties see individual properties see individual properties see individual properties per grammar see individual properties
              text-wrap-mode wrap | nowrap wrap text yes n/a discrete per grammar specified keyword
              text-wrap-style auto| balance | stable | pretty auto block containers hat establish an inline formatting context yes n/a discrete per grammar specified keyword
              white-space normal | pre | nowrap | pre-wrap | pre-line | <'white-space-collapse'> || <'text-wrap-mode'> || <'white-space-trim'> normal text yes n/a discrete n/a specified keyword
              white-space-collapse collapse | discard | preserve | preserve-breaks | preserve-spaces | break-spaces collapse text yes n/a discrete per grammar specified keyword
              white-space-trim none | discard-before || discard-after || discard-inner none inline boxes and block containers no n/a discrete per grammar specified keyword(s)
              word-break normal | break-all | keep-all | manual | auto-phrase | break-word normal text yes n/a discrete n/a specified keyword
              word-space-transform none | [ space | ideographic-space ] && auto-phrase? none text yes N/A discrete per grammar as specified
              word-spacing normal | <length-percentage> normal text yes relative to computed font-size, i.e. 1em by computed value type n/a an absolute length and/or a percentage
              word-wrap normal | break-word | anywhere normal text yes n/a discrete n/a specified keyword
              wrap-after auto | avoid | avoid-line | avoid-flex | line | flex auto inline-level boxes and flex items no n/a discrete per grammar specified keyword
              wrap-before auto | avoid | avoid-line | avoid-flex | line | flex auto inline-level boxes and flex items no n/a discrete per grammar specified keyword
              wrap-inside auto | avoid auto inline boxes no n/a discrete per grammar specified keyword

              Issues Index

              This section is still under discussion and may change in future drafts.
              Does this preserve line break opportunities or no? Do we need a distinct "hide" value? If it preserves line break opportunities, maybe it should be replaced with a word-space-transform value?
              What should happen here for white-space-collapse: preserve-spaces?
              Should we define this for Level 4?
              The name of this property is a placeholder, pending the CSSWG finding a better name.
              See thread. Issue is about requiring a minimum length for lines. Common measures seem to be

              Suggestion for value space is match-indent | <length> | <percentage> (with Xch given as an example to make that use case clear). Alternately <integer> could actually count the characters.

              It’s unclear how this would interact with text balancing (above); one earlier proposal had them be the same property (with 100% meaning full balancing).

              People have requested word-based limits, but since this is really dependent on the length of the word, character-based is better.

              alternatively, this value could be based on keep-all rather than normal. Yet another variant is to merge this behavior with keep-all.
              Is hyphenate-limit-zone a good name? Comments/suggestions?
              Do we need to add a none value to overflow-wrap to opt out of relaxing the keep-all' and auto-phrase'' restrictions as allowed by overflow-wrap: normal?
              Is this intended to say that it’s the centers of the alignment characters that should be aligned? It’s not clear that’s what it says, but that (or a different behavior) needs to be specified, to describe what happens when different occurrences of the alignment character are in different fonts. (Further, is that the intended behavior? Probably the most significant use case to consider is bold vs. non-bold text, which only varies slightly in width.) [feedback] [minutes face-to-face 2016-02-02 10:00 AM]
              This needs to specify what text is searched for the alignment character. Is it only in-flow text whose containing block is the cell? Or is text within any in-flow descendants in the block formatting context established by the cell considered? If so, is it considered only as long as its text-align property is consistent with the cell’s? (Consistent in the alignment character, or fully consistent?)
              This behavior of aligning as though the alignment character had been inserted at the end of the contents of the cell, combined with center-of-character alignment, will produce gaps on the end-side of lines that are alone on a line with <string> text-alignment, when none of the lines of the column has the alignment character, or, more importantly, when some of the lines do have the alignment character, but the column is not laid out at its max-content width. This is probably undesirable.
              When the alignment character is inserted at the end of the contents, which font is used? (In particular, if the alignment character might be within a descendant block, is it the font of the block or the font of the table cell? Or if the insertion is at a forced break within an inline, does it use the font of the inline or the font of the block or cell?)
              This should have a formal definition of how character alignment affects the min-content and max-content intrinsic widths (of table columns and all content that can be inside table columns). Max-content intrinsic widths need to be split into three numbers (assuming that it’s the centers of the alignment character that are aligned): one for widths without alignment characters, one for widths on the inline-start side of the center of the alignment character, one for widths on the inline-end side of the center of the alignment character. This operates based on all segments of text between forced breaks for max-content widths. For min-content widths, segments of text between forced breaks that contain optional breaks within them should clearly contribute only to the without-alignment-character width. However, it’s less clear whether all min-content widths should work this way, or whether segments between forced breaks that do not have optional breaks (and perhaps only those that actually contain the alignment character) should contribute to start-side-of-alignment-character and end-side-of-alignment-character min-content widths instead; this choice is a tradeoff between the meaning of min-content sizing of a table meaning the narrowest reasonable size versus honoring alignment characters in more cases. Another option might be to use whether line-breaking of optional breaks is allowed as a control for which behavior to use.
              Formally defining the intrinsic width contributions of column-spanning cells with <string> values of text-align is a complicated (although straightforward) extension of the decisions made for intrinsic width contributions of non-column-spanning cells; this should also be formally defined. Contributions end up being made to the split intrinsic widths of the startmost or endmost column (whichever is used for alignment), and to the without-alignment-character intrinsic widths of the other spanned columns.
              This keyword used to be part of text-spacing; it might need renaming to be more specific now that it’s here, as it implies that e.g. U+0020 cannot be compressed. [Issue #7079]
              A variant of this property is inherited, and applies on each block container individually, only affecting the line boxes that are direct children of that block. This is less useful, but probably easier to implement.
              Somehow also moving the floats that originate in the same block container by the same amount would make things line up more nicely, which would be especially valuable in CJK layout. Exactly how that works, and how it interacts with intruding floats from ancestor elements is left as an exercise for the reader.
              Do we need auto? It would be weird for the author to choose platform-dependent behavior at the start of the first line, and it should otherwise use trim-auto.
              Classes and Unicode code points need to be reviewed.
              MDN

              hyphenate-character

              Firefox98+SafariNoneChrome106+
              Opera?Edge106+
              Edge (Legacy)?IENone
              Firefox for Android?iOS Safari?Chrome for Android?Android WebView?Samsung Internet?Opera Mobile?
              MDN

              text-wrap

              In no current engines.

              FirefoxNoneSafariNoneChromeNone
              Opera?EdgeNone
              Edge (Legacy)?IENone
              Firefox for Android?iOS Safari?Chrome for Android?Android WebView?Samsung Internet?Opera Mobile?
              MDN

              white-space-collapse

              In no current engines.

              FirefoxNoneSafariNoneChromeNone
              Opera?EdgeNone
              Edge (Legacy)?IENone
              Firefox for Android?iOS Safari?Chrome for Android?Android WebView?Samsung Internet?Opera Mobile?
              CanIUse

              Support:Android Browser116+Baidu Browser13.18+Blackberry Browser (limited)7+Chrome42+Chrome for Android116+Edge79+Firefox91+Firefox for Android116+IENoneIE MobileNoneKaiOS BrowserNoneOpera29+Opera MiniNoneOpera Mobile73+QQ Browser13.1+Safari13.1+Safari on iOS13.4+Samsung Internet4+UC Browser for Android15.5+

              Source: caniuse.com as of 2023-08-31

              CanIUse

              Support:Android Browser116+Baidu Browser13.18+Blackberry Browser (limited)7+Chrome44+Chrome for Android116+Edge12+Firefox15+Firefox for Android116+IE5.5+IE Mobile10+KaiOS Browser2.5+Opera31+Opera MiniNoneOpera Mobile73+QQ Browser13.1+Safari9+Safari on iOS9.0+Samsung Internet4+UC Browser for Android15.5+

              Source: caniuse.com as of 2023-08-31

              CanIUse

              Support:Android Browser116+Baidu Browser13.18+Blackberry BrowserNoneChrome88+Chrome for Android116+Edge105+Firefox43+Firefox for Android116+IENoneIE MobileNoneKaiOS Browser2.5+Opera91+Opera MiniNoneOpera Mobile73+QQ Browser13.1+SafariTP+Safari on iOSNoneSamsung Internet6.2+UC Browser for Android15.5+

              Source: caniuse.com as of 2023-08-31

              CanIUse

              Support:Android Browser4.4+Baidu Browser13.18+Blackberry Browser10+Chrome23+Chrome for Android116+Edge18+Firefox49+Firefox for Android116+IE (limited)5.5+IE Mobile (limited)10+KaiOS Browser3.0+Opera12.1+Opera Mini (limited)AllOpera Mobile73+QQ Browser13.1+Safari6.1+Safari on iOS7.0+Samsung Internet4+UC Browser for Android15.5+

              Source: caniuse.com as of 2023-08-31

              CanIUse

              Support:Android Browser116+Baidu Browser13.18+Blackberry BrowserNoneChrome47+Chrome for Android116+Edge79+Firefox49+Firefox for Android116+IE (limited)5.5+IE Mobile (limited)10+KaiOS Browser3.0+Opera34+Opera MiniNoneOpera Mobile73+QQ Browser13.1+Safari16.0+Safari on iOS16.0+Samsung Internet5.0+UC Browser for Android15.5+

              Source: caniuse.com as of 2023-08-31

              CanIUse

              Support:Android BrowserNoneBaidu BrowserNoneBlackberry BrowserNoneChromeNoneChrome for AndroidNoneEdgeNoneFirefox55+Firefox for Android116+IE (limited)8+IE Mobile (limited)10+KaiOS Browser3.0+OperaNoneOpera MiniNoneOpera MobileNoneQQ BrowserNoneSafariNoneSafari on iOSNoneSamsung InternetNoneUC Browser for AndroidNone

              Source: caniuse.com as of 2023-08-31

              CanIUse

              Support:Android Browser4.4+Baidu Browser13.18+Blackberry Browser (limited)7+Chrome30+Chrome for Android116+Edge12+Firefox2+Firefox for Android116+IE9+IE Mobile10+KaiOS Browser2.5+Opera17+Opera MiniNoneOpera Mobile73+QQ Browser13.1+Safari6.1+Safari on iOS4.0+Samsung Internet4+UC Browser for Android15.5+

              Source: caniuse.com as of 2023-08-31

              CanIUse

              Support:Android Browser (limited)2.1+Baidu Browser (limited)13.18+Blackberry Browser (limited)7+Chrome (limited)4+Chrome for Android (limited)116+Edge (limited)12+Firefox (limited)2+Firefox for Android (limited)116+IE (limited)5.5+IE Mobile (limited)10+KaiOS Browser (limited)2.5+Opera (limited)9+Opera Mini (limited)AllOpera Mobile (limited)10+QQ Browser (limited)13.1+Safari16.0+Safari on iOS16.0+Samsung Internet (limited)4+UC Browser for Android (limited)15.5+

              Source: caniuse.com as of 2023-08-31

              CanIUse

              Support:Android BrowserNoneBaidu BrowserNoneBlackberry BrowserNoneChromeNoneChrome for AndroidNoneEdgeNoneFirefoxNoneFirefox for AndroidNoneIENoneIE MobileNoneKaiOS BrowserNoneOperaNoneOpera MiniNoneOpera MobileNoneQQ BrowserNoneSafari10+Safari on iOS10.0+Samsung InternetNoneUC Browser for AndroidNone

              Source: caniuse.com as of 2023-08-31