Re: Comments on the draft W3C Annotatea specification from Stephen Crawley on 2009-01-23 (www-annotation@w3.org from January to June 2009)

From: Stephen Crawley <uqscrawl@uq.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:42:14 +1000
To: www-annotation@w3.org
Message-Id: <1232682134.3000.37.camel@g710-3318.itee.uq.edu.au>

And my sharp eyed colleague has just spotted another on:

27) There is a mistake in the example in section 3.1

<r:RDF xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
       xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#"
       xmlns:d="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
       xmlns:tr="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/thread#"
       xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xx/http#"
       xmlns:rt:"http://www.w3.org/2001/12/replyType">

The last xmlns declaration is missing a '#' after 'replyType'.  Actually,
this particular xmlns declaration defines a prefix that is not used in the
example and could therefore be deleted entirely.

Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 03:43:00 UTC