- From: Urs Holzer <urs@andonyar.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:04:23 +0100
- To: Matthew Wilson <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-annotation@w3.org
Matthew Wilson wrote: > I tend to treat the W3C Server and Amaya as a reference > implementation. True, they are reference implementations, however even reference implementations can have quirks. But you are right, it is important that our software can interoperate with Amaya and the W3C annotea server. I know that there is at least one other server implementation. Perhaps we should take a look at that one too? We also could contact the developers/admins of the W3C annotea server. We also have to get the Amaya developers to fix those crashes. > > In Annozilla, the exact behaviour should be configurable on a per > > server basis in order to work with the w3c's annotea server. > > That sounds like too much of an effort to put on the user, to expect > them to know the exact behaviour of the server they're using. You are right about that. Perhaps we can sort out these problems somehow. (But never mind, I will adapt my own server code so that it works with Annozilla anyway.) I will be able help (as far as I can) in two weeks. Right now I don't have enough time. By the way, is there someone else reading this Mailinglist? I would really like to hear more opinions.
Received on Saturday, 12 January 2008 19:04:33 UTC