- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 01:52:40 -0500 (EST)
- To: Mark Smith <mcs@pearlcrescent.com>
- Cc: www-annotation@w3.org
This optimisation assumes that the server has the bodies itself. This isn't (in a number of the cases I have played with) a valid assumption. So while I have no problem with allowing a query that includes "please give me all the annotation metadata and bodies that you have for FOO", I think requiring it would seriously restrict the usefulness of the protocol. A simple example is to think of descriptions of images, where a user might make an annotation to provide an explicit linkage that can be automatically retrieved. This is a common accessibility use case (making an alternative representation available for a person who cannot clearly see or interpret the picture) where one might often expect to find the body of the annotation is an existing resource on the web, referred to rather than held by the annotea server. Cheers Chaals On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Mark Smith wrote: > >[Please accept my apologies if this has already been discussed; I did >not find it in the list archives.] > >I have been looking at the Annotea protocol, and it seems that one HTTP >GET request must be issued to retrieve each annotation body. If a >client wants to retrieve the list of annotations for a page as well as >all of the associated bodies, it can't do so very efficiently. Or did I >miss something in the spec? > >Are people open to extending the protocol to allow this kind of query? >If so, I'd be happy to experiment a bit and propose something concrete. > >Reference: http://www.w3.org/2002/12/AnnoteaProtocol-20021219 > >-- >Mark Smith >LDAP Book Information: http://www.ldapbook.com/ >What's Next: http://www.pearlcrescent.com/ > > Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22 Post: 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia or W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 01:52:48 UTC