- From: Matthew Wilson <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 18:26:51 +0100
- To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>, <www-annotation@w3.org>
At 13:04 06/06/02 +0000, Jim Ley wrote: >Matthew wrote: >At 17:01 05/06/02 +0000, Jim Ley wrote: > >>Are any Annotation Types other than comment currently implemented? It > >>seems to me everything is a Comment. > > > >Really? When I was starting on Annozilla, it looked to me as though > >everything were an Annotation, but some were also other types, eg >Comments. > >All the annotations have rdf:type of a:Annotation however they also have >a property a:annotationType of >http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType#Comment > >Since looking in more detail, I've also found an >http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType#Example >although the actual annotations don't appear to be any different from the >normal comments, and certainly aren't Examples and a single one of >Question - they seem to share a addr:name/addr:firstName being identical >aswell, so it could be from a different UA? Annozilla can do different annotation types. >On that might it be nice if we could trace which client made an >attribution - at the moment I only send identifying in the http header, >it might be nice if we included it withing the attribution itself. I agree this would be useful, if only for identifying compatibility problems. Matthew
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 13:26:57 UTC