- From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:14:54 +0300
- To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: <www-annotation@w3.org>, <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>
I believe you are talking about the meta element[1] when used with the http-equiv attribute. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/global.html#meta-data Kindest regards, Manos > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Ley [mailto:jim@jibbering.com] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 11:58 AM > To: www-annotation@w3.org; HTML WG > Subject: Re: Using XPointer with HTML > > > > The actual question we were discussing was: can an XHTML 1.1 be > delivered as > > text/html? The answer is apparently yes. > > > > Indeed, to make it WAI compliant the document above should > be delivered > with > > a content-language header, or there should be a <meta> to > that effect > added. > > Can you clarify this META? > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/dirlang.html Says for HTML 4.0: | An element inherits language code information according to the following | order of precedence (highest to lowest): |The lang attribute set for the element itself. |The closest parent element that has the lang attribute set (i.e., the lang |attribute is inherited). |The HTTP "Content-Language" header (which may be configured in a |server). For example: Content-Language: en-cockney |User agent default values and user preferences. No mention of META, has something changed for XHTML? Jim.
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 05:15:04 UTC