- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:56:22 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-annotation@w3.org>
> Agenda for Monday: Could we add an update on the status of EARL w.r.t. Annotea? (Or, sort it out on the list). Things I'm wondering:- * The distinction between EARL "reporting" and Annotea "annotating" doesn't seem clear. EARL already has a mechanism for saying "this is the thing that we're talking about", so I don't get why it would be in an annotation. What would the annotation be about? Do we need a subset of EARL to put in the annotation? * How easy is it to modify the existing annotea tools to simply generate EARL, as it is, straight up? * Annotations have methods for saying "the content type of this body is x". This is something that we still need to sort out amongst ourselves: how to identify a piece of content as being EARL, and whether or not we even need to. * Annotea treats :Body content as parseType="literal", which is incorrect in our case, because we're putting RDF in there. Having said that, I'm not sure how it would fit into the annotation model if it was left as RDF. * Can't annotations be stored as XLinks? cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-annotation/2001JanJun/0095 -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2001 18:54:51 UTC