- From: Matthew Wilson <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 19:49:27 +0100
- To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>, Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Cc: Claus Augusti <caugusti@formatvorlage.de>, www-annotation@w3.org
At 07:58 30/05/01 -0400, Art Barstow wrote: >On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:21:32AM +0300, Manos Batsis wrote: > > > > Apologies for the possibly naive question, but I am still too busy to > > study the annotea systems in depth so... > > In the hypothetical situation of using browser sniffing and providing > > the relative code (in IE's case, yours) will there be any problems on > > different browsers annotating the same documents? > >This should not be a problem. I haven't tried Claus' Annotea >client but I am able to use Annozilla - the Mozilla Annotea client: > > http://annozilla.mozdev.org/ > >and the Annotea bookmarklets (documented at): > > >http://www.w3.org/2000/02/collaboration/annotation/JavaScript/Annotea-JavaScript.html > >with Netscape Communicator to browse annotations created with the >Amaya implementation of Annotea: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/ > >The oppposite - annotations created via Annozialla and the bookmarklets >can be browsed with Amaya - also works. The only difference (apart from bugs!) is the level of XPointer implementation. I don't know what level of XPointer support Amaya has, but it certainly supports string-range(), which Annozilla does not (yet). There is one current bug I know of, Annozilla will fail to understand, say, /html/p[10]. This will be fixed in the next release. Matthew
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2001 14:49:35 UTC