- From: Jeff Hunt <jeffhunt90@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:13:25 +1300
- To: Amaya list <www-amaya@w3.org>
To me the success of Amaya is: 1. that it it is a passable WYSIWYG editor great for pasting content straight onto the page. 2. it is also an acceptable code editor with a lot of help for for adding simple code that is tiresome to type. 3. Most importantly it validates inter-actively (on the fly), so that if I forget to close a div I know at once before I have to muddle back through code looking for a mistake. I have not found any other editor that comes close to this scope and convenience. The Maths and Vector Graphics may have been a mistake - it is the convenience of the editing of simple code that I like. The faulty display I find unimportant. It is good enough to get an idea of how things look. And it is simple to run a range of other browsers at the same time to simply see if the code looks good on the standard browsers. On 12/23/11, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis, Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:42:52 +0000: >> 2011/12/22 Dominique Meeùs <dominique@d-meeus.be>: > >>> —1.a. It is a reasonable editor. I have been using it and I still >>> sometimes >>> do (in combination with Bluefish for the code). (For multipage projects, >>> I >>> write in TEI and generate the pages automatically with all hyperlinks.) >> >> It would be interesting to know what you and other users find it does >> _well_. Even if the Amaya project itself dies, it would be worth >> recording its successes in the hopes that other projects might >> incorporate them. > > And your opinion, as well. ;-D > > My take: In some ways, Amaya is just of word processor that uses > HTML/XHTML as its native format. In that regard, its table of contents > features are great. Its conversion features, such as its ability to > convert e.g. paragraphs to a lists, is a good, simple idea. Its ability > to select parent or child content etc with simple keystrokes. There are > many, many details. All other WYSIWYG editors seem to have been made > for 'designing' short things. > > Leif H Silli
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 23:13:53 UTC