- From: Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:12:20 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Laurent Carcone <carcone@w3.org>
- cc: Amaya Mailing List <www-amaya@w3.org>
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Laurent Carcone wrote: > Hugh Sasse wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Laurent Carcone wrote: [...] > > The part of the spec that I quoted suggests to me that there should be. > > Who maintains the library? I seem to recall that the linemode browser > > which was part of the library is no longer maintained. > > > Indeed, the libwww is no longer maintained > > > > > > So , there is no way in the current version to dynamically change this > > > maximum. > > > > > > > What about future versions of Amaya? == Are you giving this the status > > of WONTFIX? > > > > I guess we won't change the maximum of redirects defined in Amaya > initialization. Does this leave room for the user to change the setting later? > Can you give us a uri so that we can test the number of redirections needed in > this case ? I've only been using Amaya again because I was trying to debug a problem, so have not run into this enough to supply a URL accessible to you. The URL I had problems with is a) internal to the university, and probably inaccessible from outside, and b) fails after a login. Clearly I can't give you my login. Isn't it possible to setup a group of pages with >6 redirects on a local server to replicate this? > > > > > > I guess it's the first report on this problem, the mail you pointed out > > > concerns a redirection problem for the PUT method and I think it has been > > > fixed. > > > > > > > Would redirect code be so different for put and post that it would not be > > shared? What causes you to think it has been fixed -- can you look it up, > > or is this from memory? > > > > The problem was in Amaya code (when Amaya treats the result of the request), > not in the libwww, and it has been fixed. OK, thanks. > > Thanks, > Laurent Carcone > Hugh
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 17:13:04 UTC