- From: Irene Vatton <Irene.Vatton@inria.fr>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:31:35 +0100
- To: ve3ll@cogeco.ca
- Cc: www-amaya@w3.org
Le mardi 03 février 2009 à 08:56 -0500, ve3ll@cogeco.ca a écrit : > Although Amaya 6 and 7 are predominant in the general > population of users in North America, site developers > are using conformant css and html to create new pages.... > > And Amaya is targeted to those authoring, not viewing pages. > If Amaya was more WYSIWYG, there would be a greater > number of people willing to add it to their toolbox.... > > My wish is that Amaya would render documents in > a manner that most would see them .... The goal of Amaya is to create web contents. Amaya doesn't respect CSS properties that disturb the editing. For example, Amaya displays empty elements (<p> or <div>) with a non null height as the user may want to click on them and insert information within. With Amaya, what you see is what you need to edit. > > > > fail ... All major browsers and many of the minor > > > varieties can pass Acid 2 > > > > Not quite: IE (6 and 7), unfortunately or not, are among the major > > browsers and is likely to hand around for a long time (due to > > enterprise upgrade policies, which are generally very slow). This is > > pretty broken in Acid tests [1]... :-| Fortunately, IE 8 is finally > > passing Acid 2 -- years after its direct competitors, so I'm generally > > happy with the move. :-) > > > > > > > i am wondering if you are testing > > > progress against Acid 2 or some other reference ???-- > > > > Yes, using Acid tests would be nice, maybe Acid 3 also, given that > > Amaya renders a useful set of SVG already. ;-) > > > > > > Regards, > > Helder Magalhes > > > > > > [1] http://acidtests.googletoad.com/ > > -- -- Irene Vatton <Irene.Vatton@inria.fr> INRIA
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 14:32:09 UTC