- From: Keith Rubow <krubow@micro-aide.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 18:30:29 +0000
- To: www-amaya@w3.org
Actually the problem is much worse than this. If you make any change to the document at all and then save the file, you will see that Amaya has actually _deleted_ the <u> and </u> tags from inside the textarea. Amaya should never make such a modification to a document. Keith Rubow ve3ll@cogeco.ca wrote: > Small bug in textarea element rendering where strings that > include tags do not display the tags themselves ..... > > Short demo file follows --------------- > ----------------------------------- > <?xml version="1.1" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> > <html xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> > <head><title>Textarea:VE3LL@RAC.CA</title> > <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"/> > </head><body><h1>Textarea:VE3LL@RAC.CA</h1> > <p>These are two examples of tags nested inside blocks. Most browsers > interpret inside pre element but not inside textarea. Amaya for some > reason does not even show the nested tag inside a textarea. The > uninterpreted tag should be displayed as is !! Compare with other > browsers to see desired result.</p> > <pre>This is <u>underlined</u> word!</pre> > <p> </p> > <textarea id="x" cols="40" rows="3"> > This is <u>underlined</u> word! > </textarea> > </body></html> >
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2008 19:40:50 UTC