- From: John Russell <ve3ll@rac.ca>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:48:41 -0400
- To: www-amaya@w3.org
­ is supposed to be invisible to spellcheckers that is side­kick should be equivalent to sidekick. This 'invisibility' is necessary to allow 'picky' authors (read grads of literature courses) to correctly hyphenate their work without having to modify their dictionaries ad nosium. Amaya will bypass sidekick as 'in the dictionary' but side­kick raises alarms and suggestions, one of which is sidkick. One could gradually extend their personal dictionary but a better solution is to have the algorithm remove ­ and its bytecode equivalent prior to testing against the dictionary. Only someone as anal as myself would spot this i am sure but it does lead to a nice bit of programming to repair! no priority on it but it would be something for a friday afternoon when there is no mood to dig into something critical !! or just before Bastille Day, when the swim suits are packed, the map marked for the best route out of town, and the last pot of coffee brewing in the office..... --- a small toy algorithm to cover this and perhaps other variations on theme such as 's or solid hyphens ..... ta John Russell, VE3LL@RAC.CA http://www.cgocable.net/~jrussel Be sure to check your HTML markup tags by using validator.w3.org
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 18:48:17 UTC