- From: Beyer, Marcus <beyer@mi.ukl.uni-freiburg.de>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 06:45:10 -0500 (EST)
- To: "'David'" <dwmoar@findmoore.net>
- Cc: "'www-amaya@w3.org'" <www-amaya@w3.org>
Thank you for your response. > You are using a percentage of the screen resolution not pixal height Not exactly. I am using a percentage of the window size. > both the height and width tag should be in pixal height such as > <img src="mypic.gif" height=20 width=75> > if you used a percentage here such as height="20%" weidth="75%" this > would give yo a much different image, and would really be screwed up Only, if you specify both height _and_ width. > depending on the viewers screen resolution. The percentage is based > upon screen resolution, not the number of pixals in the picture. I > hope that this helps you out Unfortunately not. It _is_ my intention to scale my pictures dynamicly according to the screenresolution! Ok, I know this is not very usual, but where is the problem? If you view my page with e.g. Netscape 4.7 or MS-InternetExplorer and change the size (more precise: the height) of the window you will know what I mean. > > Why is amaya displaying my pages so terrible, > > when I try to scale bitmaps? > > With Netscape and IExplorer it looks quite good. > > Do I violate the specification?? > > I did read the spec but could not find a mistake. > > > > My html is like this: > > > > <a href="linux_de.html" target="Inhalt"> > > <p><img SRC="sym-linux2.gif" BORDER="0" height="7%"></p> > > <p>Linux</p> > > </a> > > > > Example page: http://www.stormlight.de/auswahl_de.html > > > > Please reply to me directly, > > I am not a member of this list. > > > > regards, > > M. Beyer > > > > _____________________________________________________ > > Dipl.-Inform. Marcus Beyer [mb@stormlight.de] > > Abt. Medizinische Informatik - Universitätsklinikum > > Stefan-Meier-Straße 26 D-79104 Freiburg > > Tel. +49/761/203-6698 Fax +49/761/203-6711 > > _____________ http://www.Stormlight.de ______________ >
Received on Monday, 5 February 2001 05:05:47 UTC