- From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 16:40:25 +0100
- To: "'www-amaya@w3.org'" <www-amaya@w3.org>
> From: Benedetti White, Arthur D. - CIMS-2 [SMTP:adbenedettiwhite@bpa.gov] > > It Sounds like those people don't really know what Validation is then. > These people mean upwards of 99% (finger in the air, but I'm reasonably confident) of web content creators. In my experience it is very rare for even blue-chip companies' web sites to pass a proper validation (my own won't, but I have little influence on the marketing people). Let's take some companies at random: http://www.intel.com/ - Failed http://www.ford.com/ - Failed http://www.altavista.com/ - Failed (this was the only one I've checked before) http://www.ups.com - one error - looks like they did validate it once! http://www.amazon.com - Failed http://www.whitehouse.gov - Failed http://www.apple.com - Failed http://www.w3.org - Passed, as expected. http://www.websitegarage.com - Failed - and this claims to be a validator http://www.sco.com - Failed All the failures are more serious than a missing DOCTYPE or missing ALTs, except for UPS. NB a common argument I here is that there is no advantage in conforming to the DTD if your page works with IE4/5 and NS 4.x.
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 1999 11:43:14 UTC