- From: Paul Derbyshire <pderbysh@usa.net>
- Date: 11 Jun 99 02:50:48 MDT
- To: www-amaya@w3.org
Matej Cepl <Cepl@fpm.cz> wrote: -------- But, it doesn't make a sense to comment them in this way. No one in the world told you, that Amaya IS what you called "release-quality software" -- Amaya is intended as a testbed for development of W3C standard and as such it should be generally enough to show, that some construct in *ML is possible. I guess, that all bugs you've mentioned are a long times known but nobody has a time to make corrections (BTW, when these folks from Redmont have made corrections you've asked them to do; and, remember, you've paid a lot of money to them!). To make it short -- as with all in this world, you get what you've paid for! -------- Shall I take that as meaning the development team refuses to fix or even look at these bugs? Even the SHOWSTOPPERS? I find that quite objectionable. Your editor should at least be beta-quality software... and I see no reason not to make every effort to polish it to a high state of quality. Right now it is a diamond in the rough; it could use a lot of polishing as well as bug fixing... ____________________________________________________________________ Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
Received on Friday, 11 June 1999 04:50:50 UTC