- From: Mary Cosaboom <cherry@neta.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 22:05:18 -0700
- To: amaya <www-amaya@w3.org>
The file with S&A is not valid. The file with S&A is valid. The browsers render S&A as S&A. What is correct? Is the W3C check program incorrect? Are all the browsers incorrect? Jim FitzSimons Mailto:cherry@neta.com John Kemmis wrote: > > The instance that the & occurs is within the alt=" " attribute. The > value of the attribute, which is text, is not parsed by the browser and as > such, & would be rendered as '&' not as an '&'. > > John Kemmis > > -----Original Message----- > From: www-amaya-request@w3.org [mailto:www-amaya-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Jim FitzSimons > Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 1998 6:22 PM > To: amaya > Subject: Amaya > > This is a valid HTML file. > http://www.neta.com/~cherry/saindex1.html > This is an invalid HTML file after Amaya saved it. > http://www.neta.com/~cherry/saindex.html > Why is Amaya removeing the & from S&A? > Jim FitzSimons > Mailto:cherry@neta.com
Received on Thursday, 3 December 1998 00:05:32 UTC