- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:54:38 +1000
- To: "Amaya dev list" <www-amaya-dev@w3.org>
Hello, there is a discussion in HTML WG about how to incorporate SVG into HTML (the loose sloppy language, not just XHTML). See for example the thread around [1], in reply to which I promised to ask your opinion. An important question is whether it is easier to do this if the language is strict XML-like SVG, or whether broken syntax (like HTML) should be accepted. There are two current proposals. One came from some people in the HTML Working group, and it would allow mixing case in elements, non-well-formed XML, would not allow namespaces nor some existing SVG elements. The other is from the SVG working group, and the basis is that it would require SVG to stay compatible with existing tools, by being strictly XML well-formed, with namespaces, etc. Input from Amaya developers could be helpful to the working group. (Note that the general level of politeness and respect in the group is, in my opinion, very low, so you may get rather rude or unpleasant answers :( ). [1] http://www.w3.org/mid/48DFBD20.8040109@cam.ac.uk cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://www.opera.com
Received on Sunday, 28 September 2008 21:55:15 UTC