- From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:11:23 -0400
- To: Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>
- Cc: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On 2016-03-15 9:43 AM, Rich Schwerdtfeger wrote: > Last week I had asked for an agenda item regarding applying ARIA > states and properties wit elements having role=“none”. This was from > the SVG a11y task force. I thought that was captured by the first agenda item: > agenda+ ACTION-1681 (Joseph, Amelia) Editorial change(s) clarifying > inclusions and/or exclusion rules. > - Amelia's thoughts: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Mar/0093.html > - Joseph's reply: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Mar/0127.html That is, one of the criteria for including an element in the accessibility tree is because it has ARIA states and properties in spite of role="none". If your request is different, I can add another agendum. What should it be? -- ;;;;joseph. 'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Draußen. Wieder.' - C. Carter -
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:11:57 UTC