- From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:46:34 -0500
- To: "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Link: http://www.w3.org/2013/12/17-aapi-minutes.html
Plain text version follows:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
17 Dec 2013
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2013Dec/0015.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2013/12/17-aapi-irc
Attendees
Present
+1.650.773.aaaa, Joseph_Scheuhammer, David_Bolter,
Bryan_Garaventa, Cynthia_Shelly, Michael_Cooper
Regrets
Chair
Joseph_Scheuhammer
Scribe
clown
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Remaining 1.0 UAIG issues/actions
2. [6]issue-486
3. [7]Issue-551.
4. [8]629
5. [9]CR publication of UAIG.
* [10]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 17 December 2013
RRSAgent: make log public
?
<asurkov> hey, clown
<scribe> scribenick: clown
Remaining 1.0 UAIG issues/actions
[11]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/10
[11] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/10
<asurkov> hey, davidb, ok
issue-486
issue-486?
<trackbot> issue-486 -- UAIG has some MUST requirements that
could only be tested in HTML 5, but 1) the ARIA spec is being
tested only against HTML 4 and we prefer to do the same with
UAIG, and 2) HTML 5 isn't complete; so we need to deal with
this in the UAIG CR exit criteria n -- open
<trackbot> [12]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/486
[12] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/486
DB: let's just close it.
JS: No, there is a difference between the name calculation in
the spec and the UAIG.
... I think it's editorial.
... But I think Michael wants to keep it open to make sure.
... two differences.
... one is an example of use of aria-labellbedby + aria-label
... the other is a note about alt text and HTML5.
issue-551?
<trackbot> issue-551 -- When UAIG enters CR, we need to ask
Director if we have to have 2 mappings to all platforms, or
just demonstrate implementability of mapping via a sample and
say all the mappings are therefore defined implementable --
open
<trackbot> [13]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/551
[13] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/551
Issue-551.
JS: the plan is to change the UIA menu event mappings to a
SHOULD.
... My mistake, not 551.
CS: we marked the UIA column "at risk".
[14]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/551
[14] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/551
JS: Michael, can we close this issue?
MC: we have entered CR, and the director accepted the argument.
We can close it.
CS: 486 is also yours.
MC: I think that was a simllar issue.
... I think it is moot.
... there is wording in the exit criteria.
JS: close it?
topci: 629
629
issue-629?
<trackbot> issue-629 -- Unable to test ie11 as inconsistent
with menu event mapping table due to lack of support of msaa
column -- open
<trackbot> [15]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/629
[15] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/629
CS: there are outstanding bugs, but the blockage has been
cleared.
... We can test these items, and we have. There are bugs.
... Just tracking down if the bugs are real.
JS: We have cleared the list.
MC: we can tackle the 1.1 product next, but we don't need to do
that right now.
CR publication of UAIG.
[16]https://twitter.com/w3c
[16] https://twitter.com/w3c
MC: It was announced today that the UAIG is now CR.
BG: has the f2f agenda come out yet?
MC: There is a draft, and discussions with Janina, but it isn't
posted yet.
<davidb> [17]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/
[17] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [18]scribe.perl version
1.138 ([19]CVS log)
$Date: 2013-12-17 20:38:55 $
__________________________________________________________
[18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
[23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
--
;;;;joseph.
'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
- J. D. Klaun -
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2013 20:47:02 UTC