- From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:46:34 -0500
- To: "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Link: http://www.w3.org/2013/12/17-aapi-minutes.html Plain text version follows: [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 17 Dec 2013 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2013Dec/0015.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/12/17-aapi-irc Attendees Present +1.650.773.aaaa, Joseph_Scheuhammer, David_Bolter, Bryan_Garaventa, Cynthia_Shelly, Michael_Cooper Regrets Chair Joseph_Scheuhammer Scribe clown Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Remaining 1.0 UAIG issues/actions 2. [6]issue-486 3. [7]Issue-551. 4. [8]629 5. [9]CR publication of UAIG. * [10]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 17 December 2013 RRSAgent: make log public ? <asurkov> hey, clown <scribe> scribenick: clown Remaining 1.0 UAIG issues/actions [11]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/10 [11] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/10 <asurkov> hey, davidb, ok issue-486 issue-486? <trackbot> issue-486 -- UAIG has some MUST requirements that could only be tested in HTML 5, but 1) the ARIA spec is being tested only against HTML 4 and we prefer to do the same with UAIG, and 2) HTML 5 isn't complete; so we need to deal with this in the UAIG CR exit criteria n -- open <trackbot> [12]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/486 [12] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/486 DB: let's just close it. JS: No, there is a difference between the name calculation in the spec and the UAIG. ... I think it's editorial. ... But I think Michael wants to keep it open to make sure. ... two differences. ... one is an example of use of aria-labellbedby + aria-label ... the other is a note about alt text and HTML5. issue-551? <trackbot> issue-551 -- When UAIG enters CR, we need to ask Director if we have to have 2 mappings to all platforms, or just demonstrate implementability of mapping via a sample and say all the mappings are therefore defined implementable -- open <trackbot> [13]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/551 [13] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/551 Issue-551. JS: the plan is to change the UIA menu event mappings to a SHOULD. ... My mistake, not 551. CS: we marked the UIA column "at risk". [14]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/551 [14] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/551 JS: Michael, can we close this issue? MC: we have entered CR, and the director accepted the argument. We can close it. CS: 486 is also yours. MC: I think that was a simllar issue. ... I think it is moot. ... there is wording in the exit criteria. JS: close it? topci: 629 629 issue-629? <trackbot> issue-629 -- Unable to test ie11 as inconsistent with menu event mapping table due to lack of support of msaa column -- open <trackbot> [15]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/629 [15] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/629 CS: there are outstanding bugs, but the blockage has been cleared. ... We can test these items, and we have. There are bugs. ... Just tracking down if the bugs are real. JS: We have cleared the list. MC: we can tackle the 1.1 product next, but we don't need to do that right now. CR publication of UAIG. [16]https://twitter.com/w3c [16] https://twitter.com/w3c MC: It was announced today that the UAIG is now CR. BG: has the f2f agenda come out yet? MC: There is a draft, and discussions with Janina, but it isn't posted yet. <davidb> [17]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/ [17] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/ Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [18]scribe.perl version 1.138 ([19]CVS log) $Date: 2013-12-17 20:38:55 $ __________________________________________________________ [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ [23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm -- ;;;;joseph. 'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.' 'K: Right. It's merely computer science.' - J. D. Klaun -
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2013 20:47:02 UTC