- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:32:48 -0500
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, Léonie Watson <lwatson@nomensa.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Hi Janina. > However, I question the strategy. Consider the consequences. If we now > pause to wait for: new language to be written, vetted, and approved, it > will be that many more days, and I suspect the real story is weeks and > possibly months, before the longdesc reconsideration can move forward in > the HTML-WG. Then maybe consider placing a time limit. Give the full idea (items 1-3*) ONE week to be completed. If it is not, we go with what we have. Best Regards, Laura *1. The accessibility task force agrees and comes to consensus that it is the best way to help successfully reinstate longdesc into HTML; and *2. If someone volunteers to draft solid use cases; and *3. If someone volunteers to draft additions for the spec text and those additions obtain task force consensus. -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2012 18:33:24 UTC