- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:56:28 +0200
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:49:41 +0200, Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net> wrote: > simon wrote: > >> The images are already associated with the caption, thanks to >> <figure> and <figcaption>. > > so, if i query an individual IMG element contained within the FIGURE > element, will it tell me the value for the caption and the alt > associated with that particular IMG? obviously, the user should be > the one who sets verbosity through the UA/AT (or a combination > thereof): > > FIGURE verbosity: > * "speak figcaption, then alt" > * "speak alt, then figcaption" > * "speak alt only" > > what i from a user perspective want is the ability to: > > 1. query each IMG contained in a single FIGURE for the FIGCAPTION for > that figure; > > 2. query each IMG contained in a single FIGURE for the alt text > associated with each IMG; > > 3. be able to query for the FIGCAPTION whenever focus is contained in > the FIGCAPTION's parent FIGURE > > the bottom line is getting a model that is similar to the FIELDSET, > LEGEND, and LABEL model, with FIGURE being the FIELDSET, FIGCAPTION > the LEGEND, and the alt text the LABEL, gregory. Yeah, figure has the same association model as fieldset/legend. Cheers, -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 20:57:36 UTC