- From: Cain, Sally <sally.cain@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:14:41 +0100
- To: "David Bolter" <david.bolter@gmail.com>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Hi all, Everyone has been discussing the technical issues here which of course are really important. However I think it is also important that we consider the practical issues too. Just to play devil's advocate... where would this sit in the market? Who would use it? Is the amount of work that is required worth it for the amount of people who would use it? The answer to all of my questions may be that it would be used loads and yes it is well worth it. However from the perspective of blind and partially sighted people if you are using a screen reader, you will probably continue to use your screen reader rather than change to using the speech within the page. So I think it is important to think about the other people who might want to use it. Possibly one example would be those with dyslexia or other learning difficulties. If they are struggling with a page then speech would help them with the content. However I do support the two main concerns that David has around quality and clashing with screen readers. Thanks Sally -----Original Message----- From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Bolter Sent: 19 August 2010 16:22 To: wai-xtech@w3.org Subject: TTS from web content? Hi all, What do you think about having browsers provide built-in text-to-speech capability to web content? While I imagine a declarative approach might be quite interesting I think we can go farther faster with a JavaScript API approach. The main two concerns I have are: 1. We don't want to encourage unpolished aural interfaces. 2. We don't want to conflict with traditional screen readers. The biggest potential I see is: 1. Innovation in Aural interfaces. The same kind of innovation we see happening in visual DHTML interfaces. 2. TTS solutions in places, and on devices where traditional screen readers are problematic. For example, perhaps on some mobile devices that are currently not accessible. 3. The TTS can be done in the browser, on the native platform (e.g. Voice Over on OSX), or 'in the cloud'. We just need to get the API right. Are we ready? Please speak up. cheers, David To report this e-mail as Spam, please forward it to: spam@mailcontrol.com -- DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk This message has been scanned for viruses by Websense Hosted Security - http://www.websense.com/content/HostedEmailSecurity.aspx
Received on Monday, 23 August 2010 09:15:31 UTC